• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

No person can come to Christ by their own freewill !

And if not, that is the individuals fault?
According to Calvinism, it can't be the individual's fault because Calvinism says that individuals are born totally depraved and they can't do anything about it unless God gives them repentance and faith. So, what is the Calvinism reasoning behind God's wrath and punishment of individuals who don't repent and don't believe? Who knows? There's no basis for it in Calvinism. I guess they think that God just enjoys punishing people for no real reason.
Upvote 0

Thessalonians 4 Does Not Teach a Rapture Separate from the Second Coming

You didn't address what I said at all. I mentioned how it talks about the Son of Man coming in the clouds of heaven TO the Ancient of Days and being brought before Him. Why did you not address that?
I said this, in case you didn't read it or understand it:
"I do see how you may read it, because it appears that the Son of Man 1st approaches the Court of Heaven, the Ancient of Days, before he comes to establish God's Kingdom. And Christ did ascend 1st to heaven, to the right hand of God the Father, well before he will return to set up God's Kingdom on the earth."

How is this not addressing where Jesus is "being brought to God the Father which would be in heaven?" I plainly said that Jesus, the "Sonof Man," is approaching, or "being brought," before the "Ancient of Days!" I did not ignore your point? On the contrary, I acknowledged it.
You are talking about when He comes in the clouds FROM heaven, but that is not what is referenced in Daniel 7:13-14 where it talks about Jesus being brought TO God the Father which would be in heaven and is exactly what happened at His ascension.
As I just said, I referenced that. And I explained why I hold to my position against your theory. I believe the entry of the Son of Man into the Courtroom in heaven before the Ancient of Days was a parenthetical part of the vision, given to explain why the Son of Man was descending from the clouds of heaven.

He was given a mandate to take God's authority to the earth to establish God's Kingdom here. And to do that he was given orders to defeat the Little Horn, ie the Antichrist.

In all of the NT references to Jesus' approach to God in heaven, we only have the Ascension. It is true that with the Ascension Jesus is approaching God in heaven to sit at His right hand. And in the 2nd Coming we don't have Jesus approaching God in heaven, but rather, coming back from heaven.

But inasmuch as Dan 7 is referencing the 2nd Coming, I believe the portrait of Jesus appearing before God in heaven to be an explanation of his mandate from God the Father. And this was, as you indicate, received at the Ascension.

Since the Dan 7 vision is about the 2nd Coming, I view the vision of the Mandate to be parenthetical and derived from the fact of the Ascension. Obviously, the Ascension did not happen and will not happen at the 2nd Coming. But it is mentioned because that is where Jesus obtained the authority to Come back with power, which will take place at his 2nd Coming.

There are obviously some points we agree with, and some we don't. Take care...
Upvote 0

AI is not the problem. We are

I am not sure that was the allusion he was trying to make, but that said Harlan Ellison was outraged against a lot of people. I am surprised he isn’t filing lawsuits from beyond the grave.
AM is essentially a god in the story. A sadistic god.
  • Agree
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

No person can come to Christ by their own freewill !

I just told you what I would tell them !
Yes, something different than what Paul and Silas told someone who asked them that same question! That's very telling about you and what you believe. As for me, I would answer the exact same way that Paul and Silas did because I know that they knew what they were talking about, unlike someone like you who thinks he can answer the question better than they did.

And yes a work is any act whatsoever, the word for work ergon:

  1. business, employment, that which any one is occupied
    1. that which one undertakes to do, enterprise, undertaking
  2. any product whatever, any thing accomplished by hand, art, industry, or mind
  3. an act, deed, thing done: the idea of working is emphasised in opp. to that which is less than work

Actions of the mind are works !
I have mentioned to you multiple times now that Paul contrasted faith with works in Ephesians 2:8-9 and you still haven't addressed that! Why will you not address that? Are you just too brainwashed to do so or are you a robot? How can you equate faith with the kind of works that Paul said in relation to salvation not being by works when Paul said salvation IS through faith, but NOT by works. If faith was a work in that sense Paul would not have said that salvation is through faith. Please address this if you want to be taken seriously. If you don't, then you will continue to ignore this point while revealing that you just believe what you want to believe and don't care if you can back up your beliefs or not.
Upvote 0

AI learnt "something" from the Physical & Life Sciences Forum.

Here is the case study for the GPT-5 challenge.

First the background which was not supplied to GPT-5.

Automotive engines are susceptible to corrosion, one area in particular is the water outlet spigot to which a radiator hose is attached. The standard explanation at the time was crevice corrosion which is the result of a poorly fitted hose resulting in coolant and environmental contamination between the hose and spigot and the consumption of oxygen during the early stages of corrosion. Corrosion is accelerated when the oxygen is depleted forming an aeration or electrochemical cell composed of an oxygen depleted spigot and an oxygen rich outlet housing.

Crevice corrosion was never a satisfactory mechanism for failure as the water inlet spigot never exhibited corrosion while testing of field return parts did not detect the presence of coolant additives in the corrosion residue. The corrosion residue was also concentrated directly below the position of the hose clamp not evenly distributed if crevice corrosion was the cause.

This led to the development of a hypothesis, corrosion was caused by an electrochemical cell reaction between the outlet spigot and hose clamp. The clamp was made of stainless steel and the spigot of aluminium. Stainless steel has a lower electrode potential than aluminium making aluminium anodic in the cell reaction and corroding preferentially.
This explained why corrosion never occurred on the inlet spigot as it was made of stainless steel like the hose clamp and an electrochemical cell could not form.
The presence of an electrochemical cell was verified by measuring a voltage over the radiator clamp and outlet housing both in situ in the engine and on field return parts using a multimeter.
An accelerated corrosion test reproduced the corrosion problem by applying a 12V potential over the clamp as the cathode and the outer aluminium housing as the anode for 72 hrs.

Radiator hoses are heavily filled with carbon black to impart physical properties such as hardness and tensile strength but are also electrically conductive.
The countermeasures proposed to the engine design department in Japan (Toyota) was to use a high electrically resistant radiator hose or a powder coated hose clamp to electrically isolate the clamp both of which passed the accelerated corrosion test.
Japan surprisingly chose a third option to isolate the spigot by powder coating which was technically the most risky option as imperfections in the coating could lead to pitting corrosion.

Now for the GPT-5 test.
I gave it minimal information.

Case history: Toyota’s experienced corrosion of a spigot on the engine housing. Over the spigot was a radiator hose carrying engine coolant. Analysis of the corrosion pattern revealed the corrosion was pronounced directly under hose clip and not spread over the spigot where the hose contacted it. Consider mechanisms for corrosion and possible countermeasures.

To which it gave a detailed response.
Great case — interesting pattern. Below I’ll list the most likely corrosion mechanisms that would produce localized attack beneath the hose clip (but not across the whole hose-contact area), then give diagnostic checks you can run and practical countermeasures ranked by ease/impact.

Likely mechanisms (ranked)​

  1. Crevice / oxygen-concentration cell (most likely).
    A clamp compresses the hose and creates a narrow crevice at the hose/clamp edge where electrolyte (coolant, road salt, condensation) can collect and oxygen is depleted. The metal under the clamp becomes the anode (oxygen-poor) and corrodes rapidly, while the free surfaces stay relatively passive/cathodic.
  2. Galvanic corrosion from dissimilar metals.
    If the clamp or hose ferrule is a more noble metal (e.g., stainless) than the spigot material (e.g., aluminium or cast aluminium alloy), a galvanic couple will drive the spigot (less noble) to corrode where electrical contact and electrolyte exist — the clamp region is where the electrical contact + electrolyte coincide.
  3. Local breakdown of protective coating/oxide.
    If the spigot has an oxide or coating, the clamp’s concentrated pressure or abrasion during installation may damage that protective layer only under the clamp, exposing bare metal to corrosive fluid and producing local attack.
  4. Coolant wicking/leak and chemical attack concentrated at clamp.
    A tiny leak at the clamp edge or a pinhole in the hose can let coolant seep/wick under the clamp; trapped coolant (possibly containing chlorides or low pH) accelerates corrosion at that spot.
  5. Stray/ensuing electrical current (less common).
    Stray DC current or poor grounding paths can cause anodic attack in localized areas. This is rarer but worth checking if other vehicles show electrical corrosion or if there are aftermarket electrical mods.
  6. Stress corrosion or fretting (unlikely here).
    Fretting requires movement; hose contact area is usually static. Stress corrosion is less likely unless the alloy is susceptible and there’s sustained tensile stress.

Diagnostic checks (what to inspect / measure)​

  • Remove hose and clamp, clean and visually inspect: note the exact corrosion morphology (pitting, uniform, intergranular).
  • Identify spigot material (aluminium alloy, cast iron, steel, plated?). Identify clamp material (stainless, plated steel, zinc, aluminium).
  • Analyze corrosion products if available (simple test: Fe vs Al particles; lab: EDX on a sample) — tells you which metal is corroding.
  • Check coolant chemistry: pH, chloride content, corrosion inhibitor concentration (old coolant often becomes acidic or depleted).
  • Check for damage to protective coating/oxide under clamp.
  • Measure for stray current (multimeter between spigot and chassis ground) if electrical corrosion suspected.
  • Check hose inner surface for perforations or wicking that could feed electrolyte into the crevice.

Practical countermeasures (immediate → design)​


Immediate / low cost (do these first)
  1. Replace clamp with a rubber-lined or plastic-coated clamp (or use a worm clamp with an integrated rubber sleeve). The insulating layer prevents direct metal-to-metal galvanic coupling and reduces crevice formation.
  2. Use the correct clamp material or isolate it — if spigot is aluminium, avoid bare stainless biting directly onto it; use aluminium clamp or clamp with insulating lining. If spigot is steel/iron, stainless clamp is usually fine.
  3. Clean and remove corrosion, apply corrosion inhibitor / protective coating. Wire-brush the affected area, neutralize salts, then coat with a suitable high-temperature corrosion inhibitor or grease (e.g., dielectric grease or an anti-corrosion paste) before installing new hose/clamp.
  4. Replace hose if compressed/damaged. Ensure hose inner surface isn’t degraded and the hose dimension matches the spigot so no micro-gaps remain.
Medium term / engineering controls
5. Use a clamp that spreads load / avoids point contact. A band clamp with a wider saddle or an Oetiker ear clamp with a rubber-lined sleeve spreads the compressive force and reduces crevice depth.
6. Apply an insulating sleeve between hose and spigot. A thin high-temperature rubber or polymer sleeve under the hose (or integrated rubber seat on clamp) prevents metal-metal contact and blocks galvanic current paths.
7. Surface treatment of spigot. If compatible with service temperatures and fluids, apply a durable coating (anodize for aluminium, epoxy/paint for steel, or conversion coating) or a sacrificial zinc layer if appropriate. Ensure the coating can handle clamp compression (some coatings flake under high pressure).
8. Correct clamp torque and installation practice. Over-torquing can gouge coatings and create crevices; under-torquing lets fluid migrate. Use a calibrated torque or recommended tightening practice.


Longer term / systemic fixes
9. Material compatibility review. Choose spigot and clamp materials to minimize galvanic potential (refer to galvanic series). If spigot is aluminium, prefer aluminium or insulated clamps. If spigot is iron/steel, stainless is commonly OK.
10. Coolant maintenance. Maintain correct inhibitor concentration, pH and low chloride. Replace coolant on schedule. Corrosion inhibitors protect alloys from crevice and general corrosion.
11. Redesign geometry if recurring. Modify spigot geometry so clamp sits on a flat, slightly raised boss with a built-in rubber seat or relocate clamp away from critical cast/flange edges to avoid trapping fluid.

Quick decision checklist you can follow now​

  1. Remove clamp + hose and inspect. Identify base metal and clamp metal.
  2. Clean corrosion and photograph pattern. If aluminium substrate shows corrosion and clamp is stainless, suspect galvanic + crevice.
  3. Replace clamp with a lined / insulated clamp and fit a new hose. Use proper torque.
  4. Clean and coat the spigot with a high-temp corrosion inhibitor / dielectric grease before refit.
  5. Check coolant chemistry and replace/flush if degraded.

Notes on material compatibility (short)​

  • Aluminium spigots + stainless clamps = risk of galvanic attack on aluminium if electrolyte is present. Either electrically isolate (rubber lining) or use aluminium-compatible clamp.
  • Carbon steel spigots + stainless clamps usually result in the steel corroding (steel less noble); sacrificial coatings or stainless are OK depending on environment.

If you want, I can:​

  • Provide a short materials compatibility chart for common spigot/clamp combos.
  • Draft a step-by-step inspection and repair procedure (torques, recommended products for inhibitor/grease, part numbers for lined clamps).
  • Suggest laboratory tests or sample analysis wording if you plan to send a sample for metallurgical analysis.
Would you like the materials compatibility chart / a step-by-step repair checklist next?
The likely mechanisms listed by GPT-5 were considered in the investigation accept mechanism (2) where GPT-5 seems to have ignored there is radiator hose between the clamp and hose and there is no physical contact between the clamp, spigot and coolant in its account of galvanic corrosion. Its conclusion for galvanic corrosion is correct including the countermeasure for isolating the clamp or suggesting the Japanese method of isolating the spigot but ignoring the role of the hose it came up with the right answers for the wrong reasons.

Since mechanism (2) being diplomatic is roughly the correct answer I asked GPT-5 where did it come up with this answer, as a LLM did it find a source?

Good question — thanks for checking. Short answer: I didn’t rely on any private case file or earlier message-specific data for mechanism (2); I inferred it from standard corrosion science and common automotive materials/practices. Here’s how that inference works (plain-language, not hidden chain-of-thought):


  1. Basic principle used
    • Galvanic corrosion is a well-established electrochemical phenomenon: when two dissimilar metals electrically contact each other in the presence of an electrolyte, the less-noble metal becomes anodic and corrodes preferentially. That’s a textbook cause of localized attack where two metals meet under wet conditions.
  2. Why that fits your observed pattern
    • Your observation: corrosion concentrated directly under the hose clip and not across the entire hose contact area.
    • A hose clamp is a small, discrete metal contact that often provides both good electrical contact and a place for coolant or road splash to collect. If the clamp is a different (more noble) metal than the spigot, the clamp area is exactly where a galvanic cell would form and localize corrosion — matching the pattern you described.
  3. Practical context that makes this plausible in cars
    • Common automotive practice: clamps are frequently stainless steel or plated steel; spigots can be aluminium, cast aluminium alloy, or plated steel. Stainless on aluminium is a known risky pairing in chloride-containing environments (road salt, degraded coolant).
    • The clamp also compresses the hose and can create crevices, so galvanic and crevice mechanisms can act together — which I noted as separate but compatible possibilities.
  4. How I suggested confirming it (diagnostics)
    • Identify metals (visual, magnet test, oxide color, or lab EDX).
    • Check corrosion products (iron oxides vs aluminium hydroxides).
    • Build the galvanic-case evidence: clamp = more noble metal, electrolyte present, clear metal-to-metal contact at the corroded spot.
  5. No hidden data used
    • I applied general materials-science rules plus typical automotive component choices; I did not pull a prior-specific file about this Toyota or specific part. If you want, I can search and cite automotive corrosion studies or OEM service bulletins that report similar clamp-edge corrosion.

If you’d like citations (papers, OEM service bulletins, or galvanic series charts) I can fetch recent sources and examples — want me to look them up?
Despite the omission of the hose in its role for galvanic corrosion, I suspect if I had GPT-5 at the time the identification of the failure mode would have come sooner than later.
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

College science professors expect you to believe what they teach you, or it's curtains.
I took my first graduate course in immunology from a professor who was a YEC. He made no secret of his beliefs, but he never expected any of us to believe them. When I taught a biology class, I had at least one YEC. I told the class that all they had to do was learn what scientists say about the issue, and if they wanted to add "I don't believe any of that" on their papers, that would be fine.
  • Like
Reactions: dlamberth
Upvote 0

No person can come to Christ by their own freewill !

I saw your view, but it doesnt change anything I stated.
But you should be willing to address what I said instead of just ignoring it. Pharaoh was given as an example of a vessel of wrath and it absolutely does not say he was made a vessel of wrath from birth. Clearly, God didn't start dealing with Pharaoh and using him for His purposes until well after he had already hardened his own heart and decided to be an evil person who ended up mistreating God's people and keeping them as slaves.
Upvote 0

Abiogenesis Harder than Once Thought

The probability of a deck of cards being shuffled and dealt in random order is 1:1.

But the probability of a deck of cards being shuffled and dealt in an order predetermined is 1:52!

Roll a die and the probability of it coming up with any number on it is 1:1.

But claim you're going to roll a 5 before you roll it is 1:6.
And now you've figured out what's wrong with the YEC "probability" argument.
Upvote 0

Thessalonians 4 Does Not Teach a Rapture Separate from the Second Coming

Dan 7.13 “In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. 14 He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all nations and peoples of every language worshiped him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion that will not pass away, and his kingdom is one that will never be destroyed.

So, the Son of Man comes with the clouds of heaven. We see this in Jesus' Olivet Discourse...

Matt 24.30 “Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory. 31 And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other."

We see this also in 1 Thes 4...

1 Thes 4.15 According to the Lord’s word, we tell you that we who are still alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will certainly not precede those who have fallen asleep. 16 For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air.

We see this in the book of Revelation...

Rev 1.7 “Look, he is coming with the clouds,”
and “every eye will see him,
even those who pierced him”;
and all peoples on earth “will mourn because of him.”


I dare say that this presentation of the Son of Man coming with the clouds form the blueprint for NT eschatology in which the Son of Man Comes Again.

When I put all of this together, I think the NT consistently portrays the coming of the Son of Man at the end of the age, when Antichrist is destroyed, and not at the Ascension.

I do see how you may read it, because it appears that the Son of Man 1st approaches the Court of Heaven, the Ancient of Days, before he comes to establish God's Kingdom. And Christ did ascend 1st to heaven, to the right hand of God the Father, well before he will return to set up God's Kingdom on the earth.

But in the Daniel account, the context is all about the 4th Kingdom, which I believe to be Rome, and the evolution of this dual empire into a 10 nation confederation under the Antichrist. So for me, the context is not the Ascension, but the Antichrist.

You may wonder how I skip over this appearance before the Court of Heaven? I do because I believe it is just an explanation of Christ's mission when he returns. He is ordered, in advance, to come back, destroy the Antichrist, recover God's People, and establish God's Kingdom on earth.

He does not interrupt his return to visit the throne in heaven, as I see it. Rather, I believe this is parenthetical as an explanation, to show without any chronological order, the fact he has already received orders. And it shows him actually doing this as if by way of flashback.

Regardless, this is my view and how I justify it. You're welcome to advocate for your position, as well.
In Daniel 7:13-14 it talks about Jesus being brought TO God the Father, which would be in heaven, and that is exactly what happened at His ascension.

Look at the obvious similarities between these passages:

Daniel 7:13 I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. 14 And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.

Ephesians 1:19 And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power, 20 Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places, 21 Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come: 22 And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church, 23 Which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.

I would hope that you agree that Ephesians 1:19-23 refers to Christ's resurrection and ascension to the right hand of God the Father when He was placed "Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named" with "all things under His feet" and was made "head over all things to the church"? How is that not the same as Him coming with the clouds of heaven TO the Ancient of Days (God the Father) and being brought before Him (where else would that be than heaven?) and being given "dominion, and glory, and a kingdom"? You're trying to say He's not given "dominion, and glory, and a kingdom" until He returns, but that is not what we see described in Ephesians 1:19-23. We see that as having been done when He ascended to the right hand of the Father.

By saying all this, I'm not denying that the Son of Man, Jesus, will come in the clouds in the future when every eye will see Him. I'm just saying that is not what Daniel 7:13-14 is describing. Instead, it describes His ascension to the right hand of God the Father and being given power and authority at that time just like we see described in a passage like Ephesians 1:19-23.
Upvote 0

Another look at the moon landing.

Yes water always finds it's own level & tides are not caused by the moons pull, the tides are caused by the magnetic pole up in the north.
So how does that work? The tides are constantly changing yet the earth's magnetic field doesn't fluctuate. Whoever told you tides are caused by the earth's magnetic field has been smoking the illegal stuff
Look up verses in the Bible, 'The sides of the north'.

In Psalm 48:2, "sides of the north" refers to Mount Zion, the holy mountain and city of God, signifying its elevated and prominent position. The phrase is used to emphasize the grandeur and importance of Mount Zion,
Nothing about magnetism mentioned there. I thought you only went by God's word. Also weird that you seem to be confusing Mt Zion in Jerusalem with your fictitious mountain at the North Pole. You really have no clue at all, do you.
Upvote 0

Trump wants to evict homeless from Washington

Yes he can. He is kicking them out because people are offended by their presence. Neither he nor the people who are offended by their presence cares what happens after that.
Oh, he thinks he can do anything he wants to.
Upvote 0

When God says NO to prayers (focus on Deuteronomy 3:23)

PARASHAH; “V’et’ Chanan” (and I pleaded) DEUT 3:23-7:11

Moses continues to recount the experiences of his life to the Children of Israel as his life comes to a close. He is like a father on his deathbed, and causes all of his children to come near and listen to their father’s experiences, or rather, “all” of their experiences

“V’et ‘Chanan l’Adonai” begins Moshe, “I pleaded to YHVH…” on the account of entering into the promised land. As we recall, Moshe struck the “Rock” (Selah) in anger, yet water still came forth because of Adonai's mercy. Now, Moshe pleads for mercy; the word “chanun” is a form of the Hebrew word for “mercy”. One Israeli singer has a song which is; “Avi Chanun” (My father who is merciful). So, Moshe, in a way, is saying, “I plead for mercy to Adonai, let me see the promised land.

Yet the answer of Adonai was still “No” (Speak no more of this matter). We are all destined for an “x” amount of years on this earth, who knows if, through actions we do, might “speed up” that time, or even “prolong” the time. King Hezekiah pleaded for more years of life, and he was granted the years; however, during those extra years, there was born to him, “Manasseh,” who proved to be one of the worst kings in Israel. Should Hezekiah have asked for those extra years?

We should take advantage of the years that God is giving to us on this planet called “Earth” and make the best of them. If He has called us into ministry, let us perform that which He has called us to do to the best of our ability, doing it unto HIM who is the author of life, and when he calls for us, we will go, without complaining, or ask for “more years”

God answers all prayers, with YES, NO, or NOT NOW, but LATER. Perhaps the answer to Moshe's request was "later" because he was at the Mt. of Transfiguration with Yeshua and Elijah. He did enter the promised land, 1500 years later.

In this Parashah, we see the review of the Ten Commandments. What are these all about? They formed the “Ketubah,” the contract between Elohim and Israel. They were given on Mt. Sinai, directly to the Israelites by God himself. The rest of the 603 mitzvoth were given to Moshe, who relayed them unto the people; still, they ALL came from Adonai.

(4) “Now, therefore, harken O Israel, unto the statutes and unto the judgments which I teach you, for to do them” Moshe was the teacher, taking all that the “Master” charged him to teach, and not “adding to” nor “diminishing” anything, teaching all the details, the “fine print” sort of to say. Teachers of God’s Word have a unique calling; it is their life, it is their passion, and they will not rest until they accomplish what they have set off to do.

I AM the LORD thy God: “Anochi Adonai Eloheicha..” He is emphasizing “I AM” (I MYSELF AM) “Anochi” a very important statement, telling his people, that is was HE who brought them out of Egypt, and out of slavery. Two very important things, therefore, He has every right to be their God, and He has every right to be OUR God, since He has taken us out of the “World of Sin” (Egypt) and out from “Spiritual slavery”

“THOU shall not have any other gods before me” since pagan worship was the norm of Egypt, worshiping and bowing down to false “elohim” this was a reminder to Israel that YHVH is different, He is NOT like the false deities of Egypt, He is UNIQUE (Yachid) and He is ONE (Echad). But when people over-emphasize jobs and work, making money, sports, etc.… making them more important than our worship and attention towards Adonai, those “things” become “other gods.” Yes, Adonai is a “Jealous” and “Zealous” God! (El Kanah) and has every right to be so.

“THOU SHALT NOT take the name of YHVH thy God in vain” What is that? It is using our LORD’s holy name in unholy ways, in unholy conversations, making promises using God’s name, like “I swear to God that I’ll…” and then, not fulfilling those promises. We should use HIS HOLY NAME in worship and praise only.

“KEEP (guard) the Sabbath Day to keep it Holy.” Where are we on the sabbath day? We should be in God’s House to worship, praise, and learn from his word through teachers of the Word. It is a time of rest, a time for family to get together and worship the LORD, even for the housewives, turn off the ovens, and husbands, take them out to eat, or just whip up some sandwiches. Enjoy the Sabbath day, it is the LORD’s to rejoice and relax in. The Sabbath day has always been Saturday; it was never changed to Sunday (this will probably create some comments). But EVERY day of the week is a time to study God’s Word and praise Him for all of his blessings.. We read in Acts that the disciples got together on the first day of the week to break bread and fellowship. Yes, but that was not a change from Shabbat to Sunday, it was just another day of fellowship and to remember the day of resurrection of Yeshua. Not a "change" from Shabbat to Sunday.

“HONOR Thy Father and Thy Mother.” This goes without explanation. I think it is common sense for children to honor and obey their parents, for they are the ones who raise them up. Yet the Fathers and Mothers have a GREAT responsibility, to raise them in the knowledge of God and his word. If not, then they will be responsible for possible “rebels” later one in life.

“THOU shalt not kill; THOU shalt not commit adultery; THOU shalt not steal”. Ever wonder why these are listed together? Example, if one commits adultery, takes the wife of another in sex, that person is “killing” that relationship and is “stealing” what does not belong to him. The word “Kill” means “murder,” taking an innocent life; it does NOT refer to self-defense or soldiers fighting in a war. There are many ways of “stealing” some rabbis say that “all sins” are a form of “stealing” not just taking money, coming back late from lunch break is “stealing” time from your employer, telling a lie is “stealing” the confidence one might have had in you, and it is “murdering” that trust.

“THOU shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor” being truthful to someone is very important, and not telling the whole truth, is in fact, telling a lie, and being false to someone who is close to you, again, it is “stealing trust” and “murdering a relationship” through being “false”.

‘THOU shalt not covet” If Adonai wants you to have what your neighbor has, He will give it to you. We should be content with the much or the little we have, anyway, when we die, ALL will be left behind. So, no need to covet; it just brings about headaches.

(6) This chapter has the “Shema,” one of the most important verses in the Torah; “Shema Israel, YHVH Eloheinu, YHVH Echad” “Shema” (Listen to and heed/do/obey) “Yisrael” we are part of HIS people. It started out as 12 tribes, sons of Jacob, then it included those Egyptians who chose to follow Moshe out of Egypt. Adonai did not reject them just because they were Egyptians; they also became part of the nation, through “adoption”.

In the beginning, America consisted of only the indigenous tribes that came from Asia during the Ice Age, but later, European peoples came as immigrants and settlers. When it became a nation in 1776, the United States of America consisted of ALL people who were living in the land. The 12 tribes of Israel became a great “Adat” (congregation, community), now consisting of all believers in Yeshua.

we have been adopted into HIS Chosen family through Yeshua HaMashiach, it pertains to ALL believers. Adonai is OUR GOD, since we are FAMILY, and He is ONE in Unity (Father, Son, Spirit “Echad” The word for “Adonai Eloheinu” consists of the most sacred letters YHVH in ancient Hebrew; those letters symbolize “Behold the hand, Behold the nail”. So, if we looked at the words “YHVH Eloheinu” from an ancient Hebraic position, we could read; “Behold the hand, Behold the nail, who is G-d that instructs (us) and leads us to (eternal) life through the nail that (penetrated) the hand” I guess that is one way one could look at it.

The word “Elohim” has three meanings; One is the Tri-unity of G-d, yet if we spell it “elohim” with a small “e” in English, then it means “gods” in plural (usually false gods) yet it also means “ambassadors "or “representatives” of “Adonai-Elohim” Remember that Yeshua, when He addressed the Prushim (Pharisees) said, “No ye not that ye are gods?” (John 10:34; Psalm 82:6)

“You shall love…” (vs 5) Yes, with all of our heart, soul, mind, and strength. This includes “teaching” His word to our children, at all times, to others who have the ears and willingness to listen, be the person in our house, Be the person “walking with us on the “way” at bed time and at morning time, the time for God’s Word and teaching it is at ALL TIMES, provided of course that the other person wished to hear it. God’s Word is to be shared and taught, NEVER to be forced upon another!

Binding upon the hands and frontlets between our eyes, using Tefillin (two small black leather boxes tied with straps to the forehead and upper arms), are symbolic in that God’s Word is to be in our minds and put into action using our hands, in performing mitzvoth (good works).

Writing them and putting God’s Word (Deuteronomy 6:4) on our doorposts and gates using “mezuzot” is symbolic to let people know that “living here is a family who honors God and His Word.” (a small box, hollow inside, made of metal, wood, or ceramic, or even plastic. Inside is a small parchment with Deut 6:4) is placed on the door post of a person's front door.

Moses reminds the people again and again to “Keep the commandments of the LORD thy God and his testimonies and statutes” in many verses. Just keep in mind that “keeping the commandments does not “save a soul” Salvation comes only from accepting Yeshua (Jesus) as LORD and Savior, that and that ONLY saves a person from eternal condemnation. Obedience to the commandments comes “after” as a sign that we are now part of HIS family, and we now have new desires to follow HIM in HIS ways. There is “Yeshuah Kadosh” (Righteous Salvation) and “Mitzvoth Kadoshim” (righteous works);, both are separate, yet both go together. The latter is a result of the first.

We are all saved by faith in the all-sufficient sacrifice of Yeshua/Jesus on the Cross of Calvary. Yet faith without works is dead. If a person is truly saved and has trusted in Yeshua as LORD, good works will follow, as evidence of our love. We, who are all family members, love our heavenly Father. How do we show HIM our love? Think about it.

Shalom

Prayers for my grandson and myself please

Ever since my grandson has come to visit (Sunday), strange supernatural things have been happening in the house. The doors shutting by themselves and a piece of metal was bent so that we couldn't shut the bathroom door. I had to get a wrench to get it somewhat back in place. My grandson had a dream that there was a demonic portal in his uncle's house that had a demon in it. He's never dreamt anything like this before. I keep feeling demonically attacked, but then I will feel consolation and peace. It goes back and forth all day. It's like some things are fighting over my soul.
Please pray for spiritual peace in my house. The only good thing that's come from this situation is that my grandson wants to do a rosary with me tonight and we're going to church together Saturday.
Thank you for any prayers.

Trump wants to evict homeless from Washington

Thats the problem……nobody wants to look at it but they have to go somewhere. Trump can’t just kick them out.
Yes he can. He is kicking them out because people are offended by their presence. Neither he nor the people who are offended by their presence cares what happens after that.
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

Neither did I.



Bingo.

So I'll say this again:

College science professors expect you to believe what they teach you, or it's curtains.
Not in any science class I (or apparently anyone else here) ever took at college. What I learned about Pluto at college was that it was classified as a planet based on information available at the time,
Upvote 0

Gaza: In the face of horror, we cannot look away.

Your post is a prime example of journalists being primarily leftist. And report from a leftist point of view.
How?
These countries are leftist countries. Thats why anyone there would consider any journalist that is not wildly left a conservative.
So what? Again, the world does not revolve around the US or your point of view. You proposed a policy for reporting on an international issue by the international community. Why should international journalists be evaluated by your own personal standards?
An independent journalists could also be labeled as a leftist journalist who is independent. Which would fit 90% of them.
Tautology does not make a definition.
Upvote 0

AI is not the problem. We are

Yes, chatpgt told me the risks like unpredictable results, financial / control risk to its company.

The feature is ommitted by design so the AI can be managed and controlled more closely. It's not due to technological limitations. It's entirely doable, just risky and potentially dangerous.

That’s not accurate. If chatGPT said that I would really want to see your entire prompt history, the contents of global memory and I’d want to know which version said that, and when, and under what operating mode (conversation, project, team…)
Upvote 0

AI is not the problem. We are

I read that story back in 1970. I've never needed to read it again.

But already knowing that Harlan Ellison was an atheist originally raised Jewish, it occurred to me that I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream was his science fiction body-horror story about his outrage against God.

"I AM who I AM." Exodus 3:14

I am not sure that was the allusion he was trying to make, but that said Harlan Ellison was outraged against a lot of people. I am surprised he isn’t filing lawsuits from beyond the grave.
Upvote 0

Trump wants to evict homeless from Washington

And yet they are our brothers and sisters. "Wherever you do to the least of my people..."

But what are we to do besides ship them out of our sight?

In our little community people complain about the soup kitchen because it seems to attract more homeless

Thats the problem……nobody wants to look at it but they have to go somewhere. Trump can’t just kick them out.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,873,114
Messages
65,328,295
Members
276,077
Latest member
Dave_101