ThatRobGuy said:

There's that possible reason...

However, there's also another explanation that may co-exist for that.

People who are control freaks and people with some narcissistic tendencies (which I think it's safe to say he's a little of column A and a little of column B) often avoid alcohol as well, out of fear that they may "lose control" or a fear that being in an inebriated state could make them look bad and impact how people view them.

Click to expand...

I wasn’t aware of that at all. That’s actually quite interesting.

I’m sure Trump is well aware many people don’t like him. That’s why he gets so angry when others criticize him. But, I don’t live inside his head so I really don’t know for sure.

CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN said:

Yes, one of my aunts have fatty liver stage 1. Because of food issues.

Click to expand...

Ah, I see.

That doesn’t surprise me because the liver detoxes everything, not just alcohol.

NBB said:

Some people have a custom of kneeling before statues, if that is not worship what it is?

Click to expand...

Different customs. Being Korean, I "bow down" (which is how you phrase bowing when you stronly diapprove of it) to all my brethren in the church, and to anyone who bows to me, when I walk past t altar, or when handed the cup during the Eurcharist, etc. Is a sign of respect, and not of worship. (No, I don't worship old man Park, and speaking candidly, neither of us likes the other a bit, but we still bow to each other when we pass in the hall. So no, bowing does not presupose worship.

NBB said:

Even if they are not worshiping, the bible says to not bow before other than God.

Click to expand...

How far need we carry that. Is an inclination of the head when meeting someone a forbidden bow? Is the inclination of the head and upper body as a sign of respectful aggreement verboten? Are we now to condemn forms courtest from cultures not our own as idolatrous? I think the idea idea is ridiculous.

Whenever you try to make the tent bigger, more people leave the tent.

Oompa Loompa said:

Well, when you are the biggest and strongest kid on the block, it is rather difficult to do.

Click to expand...

Is that how you determine greatness? By being bigger and stronger? Well, allrighty then.

According to the statement of purpose for this forum, philosophy has to do with why people do what they do and how to live a good life. And ethics has to do with rules people live by.

So, why do people do what is wrong? They are wrong; so they do what is wrong. But, also, it is possible that God will manage wrong people > for one example, we have in Romans 1:18-32 >

There were people who were not "thankful". And so, God let go of them so they gave in to evil desires and emotions driving them to do evil things. They worshiped creature things, instead of worshiping God.

Why?

They were not "thankful". They were not enjoying God in HIs love with His perfect contentment. And so, in their wrong character they were deeply not satisfied, and they were desperate to feel something nicer, of God's creation with the nice pleasures we do have in God's creation.

However, because they were not first seeking God, God let them go into their drives and passions for pleasure. And so they were trapped. Many wrong people are trapped in their pleasure seeking.

Their preference was not for God, but for pleasure. There are many ways people pursue their preference for pleasure. Because there are many who are not "content with such things as you have" (in Hebrews 13:5).

And, often enough, ones seek pleasure which is wrong. And so, they are not in the Holy Spirit, but they are driven by "the spirit who now works in the sons of disobedience" (in Ephesians 2:2). This evil spirit of Satan works very hard > those lusts work hard to drive people the wrong way. And by going after what is not of God's Holy Spirit, they are guaranteeing themselves that they can not ever be deeply satisfied, and their pursuing will be endless, and nothing can work to help this, of their own ability.

Only God is able to get us out of this trap of not being content and trying to get relief from physical pleasure and physical arrangements.

Many people stay deeply weak so they can keep being controlled by their desperate desires for pleasure and control for security.

**Their selfish pleasure seeking begins at home, where they did not learn how to love.**

But they used arguing and complaining and lying and fighting in order to get pleasures, instead of learning how to live in Jesus Christ's love. And they have gotten worse and worse in beauty discrimination which has them evaluating people by what they look like and how charming they act and talk. And we are seeing which way their marriages have gone because they were not brought up to know how to love and how to evaluate who they marry.

And children of such marriages can be so desperate to feel something nicer than their own deep emotional trouble. They fool themselves into thinking they need pleasure and human ability to solve their problems. And we see what is happening to these products of their parents. Meanwhile, parents can be so busy with criticizing how their children are making choices, not dealing with how the parents themselves did not provide their children with an example of how to relate in a close relationship >

"without complaining and disputing" > in Philippians 2:13-16.

"content with such things as you have" > in Hebrews 13:5.

"rather let it be the hidden person of the heart, with the incorruptible beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is very precious in the sight of God." (1 Peter 3:4)

"submitting to one another in the fear of God." (Ephesians 5:21)

"swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath; for the wrath of man does not produce the righteousness of God." (in James 1:19-20)

"Let all bitterness, wrath, anger, clamor, and evil speaking be put away from you, with all malice. And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God in Christ forgave you." (Ephesians 4:31-32)

"nor as being lords over those entrusted to you, but being examples to the flock." (1 Peter 5:3)

And pray with hope for any wrong people, at all > love "hopes all things" (in 1 Corinthians 13:7) >

"Therefore I exhort first of all that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks be made for all men, for kings and all who are in authority, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence. For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth." (1 Timothy 2:1-4)

Dan Perez said:

And you mention the Gospel , and will you explain what the. Gospel is. found and what it means ??

dan p

Click to expand...

Matt. 4:4, Luke 4:4, Deut. 8:3

ViaCrucis said:

Hagin largely took his message from EW Kenyon, Kenyon basically took 19th century New Thought and repackaged it in a Christian veneer.

There is a direct link between New Thought and Word of Faith through Kenyon and Hagin. WoF proponents will deny this, but it's actually pretty blatant.

This is why if you've ever noticed that WoF stuff sounds suspiciously similar to New Age stuff, it's not purely coincidence. Both WoF and New Age share a common ancestor. There is no substantial difference between "anointed prayer cloths" and "essential oil manifestation crystals" or whatever.

-CryptoLutheran

Click to expand...

Oh yes, I remember now. Kenyon was the link between Hagin and New Thought. Thanks.

AV1611VET said:

Which adds to my suspicion.

Click to expand...

If it lacked detail it would add to your suspicion.
If it had an average amount of detail it would add to your suspicion.
If it was published by a single author it would add to your suspicion.
If it was published by a many authors it would add to your suspicion.
If it was published in an American journal it would add to your suspicion.
If it was published in a European jouranal it would add to your suspicion.
If it was reported on the news networks it would add to your suspicion.
If this week Thursday was to follow Wednesday it would add to your suspicion.

I find that suspicious.

stevevw said:

Thats because I don't know. Thats the commonsense answer. The evidence is in the difference between what the existing tools in the records are capable of doing and the signatures in the rocks which are completely different and show how its impossible for those tools to achieve those signatures.

Thats all. I don't know how this was achieved. It would require the same analogy that shows the existing tools don't fit. That is looking at the signatures and working out what sort of tools or tech it would take to produce such signatures.

Click to expand...

It is not a common sense answer to state if you don’t know what technologies were used leads to the conclusion the technologies discovered through archaeology were insufficient. In fact it is a combination of the argument from ignorance fallacy and a false dilemma.
Furthermore you are in total denial in claiming these discovered technologies do not produce the characteristic signatures.

stevevw said:

Yes but they seem insuffient at least for some works. For example the image I showed of a clean, sharp and perfectly flat cut around 4 feet x 4 feet. Some are twice as big. I don;t think the small saws in the records nor any hand held saw could produce such a machined finished.

Click to expand...

This is an example of your denial work. How many times in the other thread was it explained to you the Egyptians used abrasion cutting with copper saws producing striation marks on the cut surfaces. From the striation marks one could tell from the coarseness of the abrasive if sand or emery for example were used.

stevevw said:

I know I have been down this path before going over all the experiments trying to replicate the same. Like I said I just don't know as there sugnatures and tools don't seem to match. I mean I know they were used for some things. But it seems stranged that they could bash into shape such fine works and detail.

Click to expand...

Here is another example of your denial. The unfinished obelisk at Aswan clearly shows depression marks due to the use of pounding stones which was also discussed in the other thread.

stevevw said:

Well if we stop and look at all the greatest works such as the mega pyramids and all the works that go with this such as the precision pottery, statues and boxes as well as the some massive obelisks and statues weighting near 1,000 tons.

We can see a short period of superior works more or less in the earliest dynasties that seems to disappear and we followed by less quality works. Its usually the other ay around. So its nothing to sneeze at. Its still an amazing achievement where an ancient people have achieved greater heights than those who came later.

I think I remember someone saying that the great pyramid was the tallest building in the world up until the 19th century when the Eiffel Tower was built.

Click to expand...

Denial mode again, did I not make clear to you the decline in pyramid building along with art in general was due to decentralization of the pharaoh’s power eventually leading to civil wars amongst the nomarchs.

stevevw said:

Its not just the manpoer though. It is the signatures in the rocks that tell us that this does not match 1 or 1,000 men cutting the stone. It is a completely different signature to a small or even large hand saw that grinds and chips away. Rather cut cut like a machine. Or cuts through rock like its soft.

Click to expand...

Repeating myself yet again the signatures do match with the equipment the Egyptians actually used.

stevevw said:

In some ways this manpower is the advanced achievement. If it is just simple tools and manpower then that sort of makes it even more incredible. But I also think there is evidence for something other than manpower and simple tools. Maybe a tech we don't understand.

For example there is speculation that the ancient peoples of the Amazon concoted some mixture to soften rocks. Perhaps an ancient science that toyed with natural elements. We know of the natural remedies the South Americans and even in my country with Aboriginals going back 30,000 years.

Click to expand...

Are you actually starting to concede the ancients may have been a lot smarter you give them credit for?

stevevw said:

It seemed to be much the same in Moses time where even the proto Isrealites were enslaved to build. Pharoahs would bring captives back to work the mines and build.

Click to expand...

I was discussing the decline in pyramid building try sticking to the subject. If Moses did exist it was sometime in Egypt’s later 18th dynasty by which time the construction of pyramids had ceased after the first pharaoh of the dynasty.

stevevw said:

Its good you know this. Are you an Aussie lol. Come to think of it I remember the blow out and people complaining. We had tough unions back then. Especially the builders and dockers which was around the harbor where the Opera house was.

Ok poor example. But there are others where it has taken years to build even with machines. I recall a big Russian status that took ages even with modern trucks and tracks. Another was a big hole they had to fill which was around the size of the Giza pyaramid and it 1,000s of truckloads over 10 years.

Click to expand...

A false equivalence fallacy.

stevevw said:

How many tombs does one Pharoah need lol. Thats a bit greedy.

Click to expand...

Did I not make it perfectly clear that Snefru’s first pyramid was unstable and eventually collapsed, the second Bent pyramid underwent modifications to avoid possible collapse, the third pyramid is the first true pyramid shape more likely to survive the ravages of time.
You would think a pharaoh’s preferences would be interred in a permanent structure.

stevevw said:

This shows how superior the earliest stuff was that they would rather tear it down than honor it. I think from memory the Bent pyramid and earier works were built on sand rather than bedrock and this caused them to collapse at the edges.

Click to expand...

Rubbish they it tore it down because it was an available source of readymade material.

stevevw said:

But the true works are under the ground. Even the earliest such as the Step pyramid has miles of tunnels and a giant box. Which points to the inner part being made before the outer as the box blocks are too bog to fit through the tunnels and pyramid entrance.

Click to expand...

What box blocks are you referring to? The burial chamber was sealed with granite plugs.
Of course the inner part was completed before the Step pyramid. What you don’t seem to realise is the pharaoh Djoser was interred before the Step pyramid was completed as evidenced by the same limestone masonry used for the pyramid to fill the tunnels leading to the burial chamber.

stevevw said:

Not just art but I think religion, the gods. Much of these works all over the world are made for the gods. Or as the cultures themselves say, "made by the gods".

Click to expand...

It also has nothing to do with the Egyptians using superior technology which you cannot explain.

stevevw said:

Thats sort of my point. That it seems the greatest and most amazing works come very early and are heavily linked to religious belief that is motivating this great expression.

You could imagine that all over the world cultures had reached this pinnacle point where they had these great monoliths and other precision and fine works which have not been surpassed. Later peoples have honored these works but never being able to replicate them. So they worship them like they are from the gods.

Ok. I would have thought they could have made more of an effort for their gods. Take some tips from the ancestors. Instead of fighting all the time. That was their downfall.

Click to expand...

Which has nothing to do with the pharaoh becoming a puppet ruler and the nomarchs taking control. Try Googling “First Intermediate Period Egypt” for the real history backed by archaeology.

stevevw said:

How does not showing how they were made deminish that the signatures in the rocks don't match the claimed tools either. It does not follow that because we cannot work out how they did it that they did not do it with something other than the tools on record. Its a matter of logic and deduction.

If the tools on record don't match then they are not the tools. If we cannot find the tools that may have produced the signatures that doesn't mean we have to then say ok it was the tools on record. It just means we don't know yet.

We know what could make such signatures but obviously that would not be available. So there must have been some other way we have not worked out yet.

We know new ideas have come forward like the hydro lift theory for getting blocks to the upper levels of the pyramids. So it may be some other ingenious idea we have yet to discover.

The same logic can be applied to the current tools on record. There are missing tools because the current tools on record cannot account for the signatures. So therefore until the missing tools in the mainstream records are produced this also brings mainstream accounts into question.

Click to expand...

The main point of my post is to show you haven’t employed logic, as personal incredulity, denial mode, argument from ignorance, false dilemmas and making false statements do not make sound logic.
A logical step which also highlights the folly of your arguments is to ask the converse question if the discovered implements were useless then what were they employed for?

Quasiblogo said:

Your help, please, concerning which English translations most closely fit the Koine Greek text of 2 Thessalonians 1:11. Some examples of what I'm reading online; what I bold are the words which I ponder:

Therefore we also pray always for you that our God would count you worthy of this calling, and fulfill all the good pleasure of His goodness and the work of faith with power (NKJV)

and may fulfill every resolve for good and every work of faith by his power (ESV)

I started to question which "direction to go" when reading this verse in the ESV. I was about to make a blog post citing the importance of personal zeal ("resolve") mixed with faith. However, when I looked at the NKJV, that "resolve" is instead rendered as a "pleasure" proceeding from God.

I looked at the Interlinear, but I'm unsure how to parse the meaning/intent.

My conviction, I should say, is that if the NKJV is the best way to translate, then it stands to reason that since we are being conformed to the Image of Messiah Jesus, His pleasure that He takes in goodness stemming from holiness becomes, and should continue to be, ours.

Postscript: a little after posted the above, I was reminded of how the NKJV and the ESV come to clash again over good/goodness/the Lord's pleasure, when it comes to Luke 2:14 (bold texts are mine):

“Glory to God in the highest,
And on earth peace, goodwill toward men!” (NKJV)

“Glory to God in the highest,
and on earth peace among those with whom he is pleased! (ESV)

Click to expand...

The word eudokia combines the Greek prefix eu meaning "good" and dokeo meaning "to seem". The word indicates a good or favorable opinion. In reference to God it is God's favorable disposition toward us out of His grace and love; and God's good purposes toward us and His work of redemption and working to bring things about toward His desired ends in Christ.

That is why in the angelic herald concerning Christ's birth there is peace and eudokia toward all men; because the Messiah is born there is Gospel--Good News--to the world. A proclamation of God's favor toward mankind, not on the basis of mankind's own moral ability but rather out of God's own love toward us, which is made evident in the giving of His Son, in the giving of Christ to us. So the birth of the Messiah is Good News, of peace, of God's own goodwill toward us.

That is why it is God's goodwill, His own gracious disposition toward us--His will and eudokia--that He should have chosen us, loved us, called us, and to bring all things toward His own intended purposes through Jesus (c.f. Ephesians 1:9 and surrounding context).

So eudokia can mean pleasure, in the sense of being favorable toward, or taking delight in; that it is God's own good intention, His own good will, His own good purpose and designs toward us and all creation, etc.

-CryptoLutheran

Chesterton said:

Looking back, I would have benefited from taking it. It's not easy keeping a home.

Click to expand...

Yes, but I bet you still have the bench you made in shop.

RileyG said:

Not to mention, many radical Muslims react very strongly if they are offended. It has happened countless times. I’m referring to a very small minority of Muslims. A vast majority of Muslims are peaceful, even if their ideology is not.

Click to expand...

A vast majority of police officers are honest and respectful.

A vast majority of Southern whites during Jim Crow didn't lynch black people.

It's still a "they" problem when that "vast majority" turns its head from the actions of that "small minority."

essentialsaltes said:

Why are all these leading Democrats suddenly facing mortgage fraud charges? Guess who’s behind it​

[Adam Schiff, Letitia James, and now Lisa Cook.]

What gets me, and should get you, is the flimsiness of these accusations despite how loudly they’ve been bruited about on the MAGA right as though they’re signals of profound moral turpitude on the part of the targets, and how they all originated in the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which is led by Trump acolyte and sycophant William J. Pulte, in private life a big homebuilder.

The important question, in the view of Adam Levitin of Georgetown Law, is who is driving these investigations and levying these accusations, and whether they reflect an “enemies list” Pulte has compiled on Donald Trump’s behalf. I asked the FHFA to respond to Levitin’s questions, but received no response.

...none of the public accusations from the FHFA specify what, if any, financial advantages were received by the targets.

And it’s unlikely that they’re the result of random audits of FHFA loans, as Levitin observed in relation to the Cook case.

“No one ever goes back and examines loan applications on performing loans for occupancy fraud; that would entail expenses for no benefit,” he wrote. “Instead, the only way anyone would have noticed a problem with Cook’s loan application is that Pulte, as head of FHFA, directed Fannie or Freddie to pull her application. That is unheard of.”

[In Schiff's case, we have an FHFA memo that says as much. The order came from one of the IGs Trump installed after firing most of them.]

The Fannie Mae memo says that the FHFA inspector general demanded “the loan file and any related investigative or quality control documentation, as well as all other loans associated with...Adam B. Schiff.”

The allegations against Schiff relate to his ownership of two homes, one in Burbank and the second in the Washington, D.C., area. But his dual ownership obviously was known to his mortgage lenders, and he has said that he took the homeowner’s property tax exemption only on the Burbank property.

[For James] In all but one of several documents, she stated that the niece would live in the house; according to her lawyer, on one form she said she’d be the occupant. But the bank could hardly have been misled, given the other documents. ... One form filed in 2001 regarding a Brooklyn brownstone bought for her family listed the property as having five units, but all the other pertinent forms stated correctly that it was four units. ... And in the 1983 purchase of house in Queens, New York, James’ father identified her as his spouse, not his daughter, on one form among others that identified her correctly.

Back in 2014, David H. Stevens, a former federal housing official then serving as CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Assn., told the Washington Post that the paper file for a standard mortgage had ballooned to 200-500 pages. “The likelihood of a minor defect is almost 100 percent,” he said. That reduces the significance of the errors Pulte claims to have found nearly to the vanishing point, especially given the paucity of evidence that Schiff, James or Cook got a financial benefit from any of them.

... the law is not concerned with insignificant trifles. In the Trump case, however, [the judge] declared that Trump and his fellow defendants saved tens of millions of dollars. “The frauds found here,” he wrote, “leap off the page and shock the conscience.”

Click to expand...

Kind of like both Comey and McCabe being audited, it's just a coincidence.

Tropical Wilds said:

It’s not that we are worried about negative connotations and political correctness… It’s that when something becomes a thing used by racists to be racists, we don’t want to be lumped in with the racists.

We harken back to the time where doing things that racists did was entirely undesirable.

Click to expand...

Bradskii said:

If I was in a group of men marching through the city waving Australian flags then unless there's an obvious reason for it (we're heading to the SCG to watch Australia beat England in the cricket), then people would assume this was some kind of march against immigration. Again, it's context.

I've got a keffiyeh in my wardrobe. I bought it years ago in a market in Morocco. I wore it recently on a march supporting Palestine and it was obvious why it was being worn. But wearing it on a daily basis locally where there are a lot of synagogues might be seen as being anti-Semitic. Context is all.

Click to expand...

@Tropical Wilds' statement removes it from context-dependence.

I thought this would be helpful for those who do not believe evolution is all it is cracked up to be - there are alot of missing parts.

Login to view embedded media

Daniel Carlton said:

Is this not a problem for certain churches who claim to be following apostolic teaching?

Click to expand...

I've found that the accusation of idolatry is usually dircted at those whose traditions include icons or statuary. Personally, I've never met anyone who I reckoned worshipped either a picture or a statue. "oh, them Catrholics worship that crucifix." No, not unless they're suffering from a mental afflicton. "those Orthodox are praying to that icon." No, the icon is just a pictture, and no one expects it to answer back, leave the pic to get a drink of water, or hum "Jerusalem".

It's easy to play the "Those people worship them images " game when it makes you feel superior somehow, but I've never known the charge to be true.

zoidar said:

I thought what I held was close to Arminianism, maybe provisionism then? Anyhow I in no way believe you have to work for salvation. You say I believe we have to make ourselves worthy to be saved. I believe nothing like that. I believe we need to acknowledge and confess we are totally unworthy of salvation to be saved. God convicts, we confess our unworthiness, our need of His mercy, then God gives us His Spirit, saves us. Isn't that the teaching of classical Arminianism?

Maybe it's true God works in our heart long before we are saved, but we have still not received His Spirit, been born again until we repent, confess being a sinner unworty of salvation.

Click to expand...

Those that you listed are fruits of the Spirit. We cannot confess without being born again. Paul is clear in Romans that people who are dead in their sins cannot seek Christ. The Bible is one big picture of God pursuing us. He writes his law on our hearts. He removes our heart of stone and gives us a heart of flesh. Ezekiel 11:19 The heart of stone is not capable of repenting or confessing. Repenting is a response to being given a new heart. Repenting means agreeing with God that we are sinners and turn from our sins.

Dale said:

You say that the Marriage Feast of the Lamb is what matters. It seems to me that the Marriage Feast is only one of several ways that we are told of the saved entering Paradise, but we’ll take a look at it. Consider this passage.


Mt. 22:1Jesus spoke to them again in parables, saying:
Mt. 22:2“The kingdom of heaven is like a king who prepared a
wedding banquet for his son.
Mt. 22:3He sent his servants to those who had been invited to the
banquet to tell them to come, but they refused to come.
Mt. 22:4“Then he sent some more servants and said, `Tell those who
have been invited that I have prepared my dinner: My oxen
and fattened cattle have been slaughtered, and everything is
ready. Come to the wedding banquet.’
Mt. 22:5“But they paid no attention and went off — one to his field,
another to his business.
Mt. 22:6The rest seized his servants, ill-treated them and killed them.
Mt. 22:7The king was enraged. He sent his army and destroyed those
murderers and burned their city.
Mt. 22:8“Then he said to his servants, `The wedding banquet is ready,
but those I invited did not deserve to come.
Mt. 22:9Go to the street corners and invite to the banquet anyone you
find.’
Mt. 22:10So the servants went out into the streets and gathered all the
people they could find, both good and bad, and the wedding
hall was filled with guests.
Mt. 22:11“But when the king came in to see the guests, he noticed a
man there who was not wearing wedding clothes.
Mt. 22:12`Friend,’ he asked, `how did you get in here without wedding
clothes?’ The man was speechless.
Mt. 22:13“Then the king told the attendants, `Tie him hand and foot,
and throw him outside, into the darkness, where there will be
weeping and gnashing of teeth.’
Mt. 22:14“For many are invited, but few are chosen.”
Matthew 22:1-14 NIV

The King represents God the Father, and the Prince, His son, can only be Jesus Christ. The servants of the King are the Apostles, Disciples and later evangelists who bring God’s word to the world. The slaugtering of the oxen and cattle in verse 22:4 are are slightly veiled reference to the Crucifixion of Christ. The Crucifixion has already happened when the Apostles are sent out with God’s word. Verses 6 and 7 tell of God’s messengers being rejected, persecuted, and even killed. God will bring destruction on those who persecute His messengers. In verses 10-12, we are told of the man who is improperly dressed and is thrown “into the darkness.” Here Jesus warns us about hypocrisy. Those who join God’s Kingdom must do so whole-heartedly.

This parable tells us that some who are brought into the King’s great banquet were not thought to be good people before they listen to God’s servants.

There is no promise here that those who respond to God’s invitation will be free from persecution before they get to the wedding banquet. There is the promise of heaven in this passage but there is no promise that God will snatch Christians off the earth before the Second Coming.

Click to expand...

The Parable of the Banquet always seemed pretty straight forward. Remember Jesus said to the Pharisees and teacher of the Law, "The prostitutes and tax collectors are entering the kingdom ahead of you"? That's what the Parable is about. The invitation is sent out, but the ones to whom received the invitation--e.g. the Pharisees, scribes, the chief priests--refused. So then the invitation is sent to the street corners, to the Gentiles, to the prostitutes, the sinners, the tax collectors, etc.

The kingdom of God, Jesus says, is like this Wedding Feast. This isn't about the end of the world, it's about the kingdom of God which has come through the Person and Work of Jesus.

-CryptoLutheran

MehGuy said:

I just want to be clear. Is earthly love the only kind of love that can be felt by many Christians?

I have heard this term 'earthly love' in Christian circles before. Never gave the term much thought.

Are there any books or other resources that delve into the topic? I have always felt alone pondering this, besides finding a few others with similar thoughts online.

Click to expand...

I wish I could answer your questions. I'm not sure what others may mean by "Earthly Love", I was just saying what I meant by it, in my previous post. Like you, I have also been unclear what people may mean by "love", "agape love", "brotherly love", etc. I feel different about my wife and my dog (usually ) but I "love" them both. I have fallen in "love" with strangers (to be honest pretty women) just looking at them. I love my parents, even though they are no longer living and I love almost every animal I meet. In my post I meant the type of love that is just a positive feeling towards people and a sincere desire to want the best for them. It also includes a feeling of appreciation for everything around me and a felling of connectiveness.
I know this all sounds touchy/feely, but I think these are emotions we all feel at times.

Nithavela said:

From patriotic to racist – can the England flag ever be reclaimed?

A group raising money to get every lamp post in their village adorned with the ‘beautiful’ St George’s flag has been met with backlash. Helen Coffey asks whether the far right’s commandeering of our national symbol means it’s forever tainted

www.independent.co.uk

Click to expand...

Thank you for the link. I appreciate it.

Peace

RileyG said:

What? I’m sure I’ve seen countless images of Jesus with the English flag and no one ever complained.

(I’m aware the English flag is NOT Union Jack)

I need to be enlightened.

Click to expand...

RandyPNW said:

I think it was Hank Hanegraaff's book, "Christianity in Crisis," that pointed out how Kenneth Hagin, a father of the Faith movement, built his beliefs on a time when hypnosis and mind science was prevalent. This Faith and Prosperity message doesn't seem to be biblically-based, even though it draws upon biblical statements.

Click to expand...

Hagin largely took his message from EW Kenyon, Kenyon basically took 19th century New Thought and repackaged it in a Christian veneer.

There is a direct link between New Thought and Word of Faith through Kenyon and Hagin. WoF proponents will deny this, but it's actually pretty blatant.

This is why if you've ever noticed that WoF stuff sounds suspiciously similar to New Age stuff, it's not purely coincidence. Both WoF and New Age share a common ancestor. There is no substantial difference between "anointed prayer cloths" and "essential oil manifestation crystals" or whatever.

-CryptoLutheran