pat34lee
Messianic
- Sep 13, 2011
- 11,293
- 2,636
- 61
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Single
I've heard since that discussion that the no-altering doesn't actually apply to animals that are actual "pets," not just donisticated (non-wild) animals. To keep related males/females in a home would require altering; these would be "pets" and not working animals. I can't remember who it was that told me this, ChavaK maybe?, can't really remember.....Perhaps that person could speak again so we can get this straight? Thanks.
As to the other, I pulled that stunt once and only once. It seems to me like just a way around what God commanded. It comes down to do we want to obey or just "appear" to be obeying. In whose eyes are we fearing, God's or man's? Before whom do we want to be righteous, God or man? (I spent a long time struggling with this, since it was deemed "alright" by the rabbis. I don't think anymore that God deems it alright, though I could be wrong (wouldn't be the first time.))
The link from before says any alteration of pets is forbidden, from neutering to declawing (inhumane anyway, it is like cutting off the ends of your fingers to trim your nails) to bobbing ears and tails.
These rabbinic decrees are a way for them to get around following the law as written, which is deception, although I wonder how they think that YHWH doesn't see it. The same thing goes on in Israel as far as I know, with the land sabbatical. The rabbis allow the land owners to 'sell' the land in the seventh year, so it can be worked by the new owner, who then sells it back. It denies the land its rest by fraud, and they will pay for it eventually.
Upvote
0