- Jan 25, 2009
- 19,765
- 1,428
- Faith
- Oriental Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
One of the major lessons of Yom Kippur is that once the blood of the Messiah covers our sins and errors they actually are transformed into an asset rather than a liability!
Our worst mistakes...once we are led to genuine repentance and change...often give us a story that strikes a chord with others at a level that probably would not be so powerful if we had not fallen into that particular problem.
I believe it was author Kenneth Hanson who wrote that in a sense Adam and Eve actually fell UPWARD!
That is such a beautiful thought to consider, especially when pondering on the reality of how the Lord (in the end of all things) actually takes His saints into a higher level than they were before---with us not simply returning to what man had in the Garden...but going above/beyond it. Will have to remember that phrase you noted when it comes to seeing how Adam/Eve, although sadly falling, ended up falling upward in the Lord.
Someone once noted that God is love according to I John 3-4--and as Yeshua says in John 15, "no greater love has any man except that he lay down his life for his friends." In the Garden, had Adam/Eve never sinned....we would have been perfect forever. And yet, if blood was never shed in sacrifice (like Genesis 3 notes with the animal skins covering them rather than fig leaves)---and Christ never came to sacrifice His own life--would we have ever known what true love is? For others in support of the concept of predestination, their thinking is that the Lord always had it in mind for Christ to come/redeem the world via sacrifice and shed blood since it was the only way that all of creation could truly know just how far He'd be willing to go in order to die for His creation............and it would be the only way for all of creation to know the GREAT price that must be paid in order for atonement to occur, just as Yom Kippur teaches with atonement.
Personally, as it's referenced in Jude 1:13-15 and other branches of Christendom accept it, I really have no issue seeing it as inspired (more discussed in #5 when seeing other camps of Christianity). I'm VERY Glad that the Book of Enoch was preserved within the Ethopian Church....and again, it's always odd seeing people trip on it, despite the fact that its already referenced within the Book of Jude---and the early Jewish church had no problem with many of the thoughts held within it when it came to the concept of a Divine Council, the Watchers and many other things. I'm always amazed at how many seem to not be amazed at the beauty of the Ethiopian Orthodox Old Testament...as there's truly so much depth to it that many don't seem able to realize.The Book of Enoch...if it is inspired....
The Ethiopian canon is basically the same as the LXX canon plus Jubilees and Enoch and different Maccabees tales (which many scholars see as a later attempt to replace lost scrolls), much like what has been found at the Dead Sea Caves. Commenting on the influence of certain councils regarding the sacredness of the Book of Enoch and the canon, it seems that the the Book of Enoch was extant centuries before the birth of Christ and yet is considered by many to be more Christian in its theology than Jewish. Jude 1:6, Gen 6, 1st Peter 3:19-20, and 2nd Peter 2:4 immediately come to mind, though there are more passages that either directly quote or refer to the Book of Enoch. And its not surprising, seeing that it was considered scripture by many early Christians...as the earliest literature of "Church Fathers" is filled with references to this mysterious book. The early second century "Epistle of Barnabus" makes much use of the Book of Enoch. Second and Third Century "Church Fathers" like Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Origin and Clement of Alexandria all make use of the Book of Enoch. Tertullian (160-230 C.E) even called the Book of Enoch "Holy Scripture".....so its very odd, IMHO, that the Ethiopic Church even added the Book of Enoch to its official canon whereas other branches of Orthodoxy reject it (to my knowledge). For it was widely known and read the first three centuries after Christ. One can go here to read it
But that's just me.
Awesome thread and many thanks for taking the time to make it
Last edited:
Upvote
0