• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Water Baptism - Is It Really Necessary?

Status
Not open for further replies.

sawdust

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2004
3,576
600
68
Darwin
✟205,772.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes, I get it.
BAPTISM OF THE SPIRIT, without Baptism of water, is nothing more than ...
"The Kingdom of God is at hand....." (Mark 1: 15
(without the FOLLOW-THROUGH required by the Gospel)
But
Baptism in the Holy Spirit and Baptism in water is the ACCORD required for us. 1 John 5: 6, 7, 8.

Baptism of the Holy Spirit WITHOUT Baptism of water is same as having the WHEAT FLOUR & YEAST in the pan....
but NO WATER !
How are you EVER going to make EATABLE BREAD ?

Are you saying the Holy Spirit (who is God) is not able to achieve His will apart from the inclusion of earthly elements?

How does this fit with "one baptism" if you see that two are necessary?

This is very confusing. :scratch:

peace
 
Upvote 0
Sep 10, 2004
6,609
414
Kansas City area
✟31,271.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
well the post you give show all that what we say is TRUE. PETER DID speak wrongly HE acted wrongly. other wise WHY DID GOD GIVE HIM A DREAM TO CORRECT HIM, and why did PAUL repuke him to his face. far as i can see SEEING HOW it is CLEARLY in scripture that he did i dont understand why you keep saying he didnt. again we did not say he taught a FALSE doctrine, you can only do this if you know it is. we dont say he got it COMPLETLY wrong BUT that he let the pharisees or higher ups get the best of him. God gently lead him back. the apostles where not perfect. we have the Spirit just like them and we are not perfect. you make them seem to be unfallible.

What do you mean by infallable? Their doctirne, or their virtue. Do you equate the two, it seems so. You have said that "Peter did speak wrongly" concerning baptism. If you want to go all semantic and split hairs, that is your choice, not mine.

Concerning myself, I'll go with the faulty Peter and Paul, as well as Christ and John the baptist; the Son of God and the greatest prophet. (Though Christ submitted to John, and John had it wrong )


Why would the forerunner 's very name, what he did, be discounted? Was he not there to prepare the way?
Is it remotely possible that Christ added to or perfected the baptism of John? I find it ludicrous that the entire 1st century church, including the apostles and the greatest prophet, who were all martyred, were on some kind of giant learning curve.
 
Upvote 0

sawdust

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2004
3,576
600
68
Darwin
✟205,772.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Concerning myself, I'll go with the faulty Peter and Paul, as well as Christ and John the baptist; the Son of God and the greatest prophet. (Though Christ submitted to John, and John had it wrong )


Hmmm. Well, not sure if you haven't been listening or what but we have been saying all along that John's baptism (in water) was the prescribed method of entering the Kingdom of God for that time all along. At no time (to the best of my recollection) has anyone suggested John got it wrong or Christ should not have been baptised in water.

But once Jesus died, rose and ascended He was then able to send the Holy Spirit to do the work (ie Christ's completed work on the Cross) that enabled all men to enter. Now that is the baptism we receive.

The problem is, if you consider water baptism necessary, then you must also become as a Jew and come under the whole Law keeping all the commands and statutes. For until Christ died and rose, the old covenant (ie keeping the Law), was the methodology God used to maintain peace between Himself and men. This is not to suggest at the exclusion of faith for salvation has always been by grace through faith. But until the Name of Christ was given the OT saint placed his faith in the covenant of God which included the keeping of the Law.

But now Christ has fulfilled the Law and we have His name in which to believe. The Messiah is no longer an "un-named face of promise" but a living, breathing man in whom we can completely identify because of God's grace.

When that Name is made known among men? Then the identification process can begin (if He is accepted as being who He is). And this is what happens at the moment one believes, they receive the Holy Spirit, ie baptised into Christ's life which, includes death and resurrection.

The Cross was Christ's baptism for all men, not the Jews alone. His baptism in water was for Israel, but the Cross stands for all, Jew or Gentile. The Cross was Christ's baptism that now saves all men. An act of mercy, a gift of grace.

peace
 
Upvote 0

Carlos Vigil

Veteran
Mar 14, 2004
1,518
69
Spokane, Wa.
✟2,026.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
Of course. Just like those baptizing apostles, Peter and Paul.

Let me review this once.....

(1). The previous poster implied that The RCC limped along practicing "erroneous" Baptism in Spirit and water for 1500 years until the deformation "set us straight."

(2). Now you imply that Peter and Paul limped along practicing "obsolete Baptism" in Spirit and water ....
during their entire lives...even before the deformation ?

(3). and YOU (the three stooges) have it right, and you are "straightening" Peter & Paul ?

That would have to mean Jesus Christ ERRED
when He chose Peter.
when He chose Paul
when He chose many other Saints down through the centuries....

Why don't you guys go sell something more usefull, such as, "Rubber-band -powered- Vacuum Cleaners"
or
"re-cycled toilet paper"

I think you would do very good at these,


Because, inspite of all your learning, you don't seem to know anything at all about TRUTH.

in my opinion.


:D
 
Upvote 0

Carlos Vigil

Veteran
Mar 14, 2004
1,518
69
Spokane, Wa.
✟2,026.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
Are you saying the Holy Spirit (who is God) is not able to achieve His will apart from the inclusion of earthly elements?
You, yourself , are "AN EARTHLY ELEMENT."
Tell me, how can the Holy Spirit achieve ANYTHING IN YOU.... unless first you EXIST ?
I realize God can work in a vacuum
But FIRST He creates flesh, then He can come into flesh. (with our permission)

How does this fit with "one baptism" if you see that two are necessary?

This is very confusing. :scratch:

peace

It is YOU who are saying there are (2) Baptisms.

I say there is ONE BAPTISM (Eph. 4: 5)
I don't think you can show one scripture that says there are (2) Baptisms.

The Holy Spirit is "BESTOWED" at Initial Baptism, do you understand what "bestow" ...."stow" means ?

We CALL-UPON and "take out of "STOWAGE" as needed.

Have you ever observed how a STALK OF WHEAT grows from one grain of wheat?
or a Tiger Lilly, ....or any flower that blooms ?

If you saw it as it first sprouted, ....then saw it again weeks later as it began to BLOOM...
Would you say it was (2) different flowers ?
or would you say it is (1) flower with CONTINUAL GROWTH ?

Same with BAPTISM.

When Jesus says "BAPTISM" He refers to His own Baptism and no other.
and he doesn't leave it to everybody and anybody's "INTERPRETATION".

We are appointed to ACCEPT BAPTISM , by someone authorized by God to BAPTIZE.

Otherwise, you could go to Saddam Hussein or Hillary Clinton for baptism... and "hope" it was valid.

:) tee hee !
 
Upvote 0

Schroeder

Veteran
Jun 10, 2005
3,234
69
OHIO. home of THE Ohio State Buckeyes
✟26,248.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
What do you mean by infallable? Their doctirne, or their virtue. Do you equate the two, it seems so. You have said that "Peter did speak wrongly" concerning baptism. If you want to go all semantic and split hairs, that is your choice, not mine.
i didnt say anything about Peter speaking wrongly about baptism. i believe he spoke of Christ baptism( the Spirit) if he did not, then yes he did speak of it wrongly. scripture shows He COULD HAVE seeing how he was leaning toward the old jewish covenant, which God And Paul showed he was wrong in doing. what is wrong with showing someone in error it is NOT like he held on to it, THIS would be him teaching a false doctrine. infallible is being always correct only Christ is infallible. It think it is MOSTLY your wrong interpretations that is the problem.

Concerning myself, I'll go with the faulty Peter and Paul, as well as Christ and John the baptist; the Son of God and the greatest prophet. (Though Christ submitted to John, and John had it wrong )
they were not faulty YOU ARE. John the baptist tells you what baptism CHrist would give you. HE NEVER said his would be like his WITH the SPirit as you keep thinking. If it was Christ had no reason to die. because JTB water baptism did the same thing, it forgave sin. But he said one AFTER me will baptize with the SPirit( now should we use the litterale translation here that it is ONLY with water, as you and the other keep suggesting) Jesus Told those who asked what the WORK was to please GOd and he said what?(you look it up and tell me, and how do you add to it, DID Christ lie to them or give a incomplete answer, which one?)

Why would the forerunner 's very name, what he did, be discounted? Was he not there to prepare the way?
Is it remotely possible that Christ added to or perfected the baptism of John? I find it ludicrous that the entire 1st century church, including the apostles and the greatest prophet, who were all martyred, were on some kind of giant learning curve.
who said we discount it, we understand what it was used for. to reveal him to isreal, it tells us this right in scripture, WHY do you discount so much scripture that tells us in PLAIN english what its purpose was for. John 1:31." i did not know him, BUT the REASON i came baptising with water WAS THAT HE MIGHT BE REVEAL TO ISRAEL." rather self explanitory dont you think. the next verse JTB tells them that GOd told him that he who this would be doen to (Christ) is the one that will BAPTIZE WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT. Is it remotely possible that you are ADDING to scripture what is not spoken of and or not dealing with a lot of passages. where does it speak of Christ ADDING TO OR PERFECTING johns water baptism. there is a REASON you NEVER give scripture for your claims it is not there. i find it ridicules that the Apostles couldnt figure out a lot of things early on BUT hindsite is 20 20. i find it hard to believe the early church had SOOO many errors in it AS the scriptures SAY. why do you think the errors JUST up and stopped, they didnt. why did the church burn people at the stake why did they ignore the holocost why did they fight wars BECAUSE they were NOT the true Church. there is NO true church body(in charge OVER chrisitans.) BUT ALL true believers with the Spirit. not a Organised church as the rcc or orthodox church or any other.
 
Upvote 0

Schroeder

Veteran
Jun 10, 2005
3,234
69
OHIO. home of THE Ohio State Buckeyes
✟26,248.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Let me review this once.....

(1). The previous poster implied that The RCC limped along practicing "erroneous" Baptism in Spirit and water for 1500 years until the deformation "set us straight."
the rformation didnt get it all correct either BUT they made it better.( the Quakers, George Fox got it better next, then Christ return will make it perfect, joke) but yes the rcc limped along and still does, all your problems with your priest should tell you water baptism and your rites dont do all that good. they have made a lot of errors. doesnt mean there all good but hardly worth showing other churches the right way.

(2). Now you imply that Peter and Paul limped along practicing "obsolete Baptism" in Spirit and water ....
during their entire lives...even before the deformation ?
they didnt teach it nor did they practice it Paul as much says so in 1 cor 1. but i am sure you distort this into meaning something else.

(3). and YOU (the three stooges) have it right, and you are "straightening" Peter & Paul ?
nope we are TRYING to show that you ARE WRONG not the apostles. BIG difference, you just like to twist it into us saying they are wrong so you dont have to look at what YOU believe. i mean if we say they are wrong that just proves we are wrong, BUT WE ARE NOT SAYING THEY ARE WRONG, we say you are wrong. lets get it write and honest.
That would have to mean Jesus Christ ERRED
when He chose Peter.
when He chose Paul
when He chose many other Saints down through the centuries....
nope you erred in your interpratations. that is corectable
Why don't you guys go sell something more usefull, such as, "Rubber-band -powered- Vacuum Cleaners"
or
"re-cycled toilet paper"

I think you would do very good at these,
this is SOO kind of you, why the need, you should just quit above and back space all this and be done.
Because, inspite of all your learning, you don't seem to know anything at all about TRUTH.

in my opinion.
well that is your opinion, BUT scripture backs up ours.
 
Upvote 0

Schroeder

Veteran
Jun 10, 2005
3,234
69
OHIO. home of THE Ohio State Buckeyes
✟26,248.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
It is YOU who are saying there are (2) Baptisms.
there was two, it doesnt say two in one baptism it says ONE baptism the one spoke of in 1 cor 12:13, how is this NOT the ONE baptism. there is no scripture that CONFIRMS your idea of receiving the Spirit through water baptism, unless you cherry pick, which you do.

I say there is ONE BAPTISM (Eph. 4: 5)
I don't think you can show one scripture that says there are (2) Baptisms.
john 1:33-34 luke 3:16
The Holy Spirit is "BESTOWED" at Initial Baptism, do you understand what "bestow" ...."stow" means ?

We CALL-UPON and "take out of "STOWAGE" as needed.
NO SCRIPTURE what a surprise. and this is silly, almost stupid if your serious.
Have you ever observed how a STALK OF WHEAT grows from one grain of wheat?
or a Tiger Lilly, ....or any flower that blooms ?

If you saw it as it first sprouted, ....then saw it again weeks later as it began to BLOOM...
Would you say it was (2) different flowers ?
or would you say it is (1) flower with CONTINUAL GROWTH ?

Same with BAPTISM.
DO you use these types of anologies because there is no scriptual support, YES you do. It is one flower no matter what or how it grows. for one the SPirit is what helps in your growth. titus 3:5 rebirth and RENEWAL BY THE SPIRIT. 1 cor 2:10-12 gal 5:25 "Since we live by the SPirit, LET us keep in step with the SPirit" there are SOO many more passage that speak of this. but i dont know if you no them because they dont have the word water or baptism in them.

When Jesus says "BAPTISM" He refers to His own Baptism and no other.
and he doesn't leave it to everybody and anybody's "INTERPRETATION".
well His is of the SPirit JTB makes this clear. SO why the problem or how have you got it wrong. SO when he speaks of it in Mark 16:16 it is his as i say. of the SPirit. you show your own error.
We are appointed to ACCEPT BAPTISM , by someone authorized by God to BAPTIZE.

Otherwise, you could go to Saddam Hussein or Hillary Clinton for baptism... and "hope" it was valid.

:) tee hee !
no scripture says this. please take the time to prove what you say with scripture. GOd authorized Christ to baptize with the SPirit which John the baptist says who was authorized to speak for him concerning Christ coming.
 
Upvote 0
Sep 10, 2004
6,609
414
Kansas City area
✟31,271.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0
Sep 10, 2004
6,609
414
Kansas City area
✟31,271.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Hmmm. Well, not sure if you haven't been listening or what but we have been saying all along that John's baptism (in water) was the prescribed method of entering the Kingdom of God for that time all along. At no time (to the best of my recollection) has anyone suggested John got it wrong or Christ should not have been baptised in water.

I have not missed it. I have heard it since I was 14.

The problem is, if you consider water baptism necessary, then you must also become as a Jew and come under the whole Law keeping all the commands and statutes. For until Christ died and rose, the old covenant (ie keeping the Law), was the methodology God used to maintain peace between Himself and men.

But I am not a blood descendant of Abraham. And neither were those in the congregation of Corinth who were baptized by Paul.

So, Paul and I disagree with you.
 
Upvote 0

Carlos Vigil

Veteran
Mar 14, 2004
1,518
69
Spokane, Wa.
✟2,026.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
[
Swdust, It is YOU who are saying there are (2) Baptisms.

there was two, it doesnt say two in one baptism it says ONE baptism the one spoke of in 1 cor 12:13, how is this NOT the ONE baptism. there is no scripture that CONFIRMS your idea of receiving the Spirit through water baptism, unless you cherry pick, which you do.

john 1:33-34 luke 3:16
NO SCRIPTURE what a surprise. and this is silly, almost stupid if your serious.
DO you use these types of anologies because there is no scriptual support, YES you do. It is one flower no matter what or how it grows. for one the SPirit is what helps in your growth. titus 3:5 rebirth and RENEWAL BY THE SPIRIT. 1 cor 2:10-12 gal 5:25 "Since we live by the SPirit, LET us keep in step with the SPirit" there are SOO many more passage that speak of this. but i dont know if you no them because they dont have the word water or baptism in them.

well His is of the SPirit JTB makes this clear. SO why the problem or how have you got it wrong. SO when he speaks of it in Mark 16:16 it is his as i say. of the SPirit. you show your own error.
no scripture says this. please take the time to prove what you say with scripture. GOd authorized Christ to baptize with the SPirit which John the baptist says who was authorized to speak for him concerning Christ coming.

Jesus Christ it is who came through water and blood--- not in water only,

but in water and in blood. .....It is THE SPIRIT who testifies to this, and THE SPIRIT is Truth.


Thus there are three that testify, the Spirit and the water and the blood----

and these three are of ONE ACCORD.



Do we not accept human testimony ?

The testimony of God is much greater:

it is the testimony God has given on his own Son's behalf.

Whoever believes in the Son of God possesses that testimony within his heart.

Whoever does not believe God has made God a liar by refusing to believe in the testimony he has given on his own Son's behalf.



The testimony is this:

God has given us eternal life, and this life is in his Son,

WHOEVER POSSESSES THE SON POSSESSES LIFE:

Whoever does not possess the Son of God does not possess life.
1 John 5: 6-12




It pays to double check that ONE POSSESSES THE SON.....

by double-checking verses 6 and 7...
Making sure we possess Him in Spirit and in water and in blood .
(the testimony God has given)

otherwise,

such a one does not possess life.




Who in their right mind would want to eliminate.....


The Holy Spirit
or
the water,
or
the blood ?


I think only a stupid person would.
or a proud person.
 
Upvote 0

Rich48

Legend
Aug 3, 2004
38,277
4,035
77
✟76,175.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Romans Chapter 6

1. What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin that grace might increase?
2. May it never be! How shall we who died to sin still live in it?
3. Or do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus have been baptized into His death?
4. Therefore we have been buried with Him through baptism into death, in order that as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life.
5. For if we have become united with Him in the likeness of His death, certainly we shall be also in the likeness of His resurrection,
6. knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him, that our body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves to sin;
7. for he who has died is freed from sin.

One is not "buried" in the Spirit; but one is buriied when immersed in water. We are buried with Him through immersion in water.

Rich
 
Upvote 0

Carlos Vigil

Veteran
Mar 14, 2004
1,518
69
Spokane, Wa.
✟2,026.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
But, you still do not know the meaning of the word, "baptism." Until you do? You will fail to see any other possiblity other than what you have been told to believe.

1 Corinthians 10:2 niv

"They were all baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea."

With your way of seeing it? That would be impossible. Moses is not water. One can not be physically immersed into Moses. When are you going to start facing this? That you have something to learn that you do not know as you should?





Of course we get it. Its you who do not get the meaning of baptism.




The Word does NOT say that. You just wrote your own version of the Bible. It never says, "accepts baptism." The Lord said, "believes and is baptized."

When we believe we are baptized in the Spirit. Those who believe will be baptized by the LORD.

Mark 1:7-8 (New International Version)

"And this was his message: "After me will come one more powerful than I, the thongs of whose sandals I am not worthy to stoop down and untie. I baptize you with water, but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit."



That's what it is. Catholic baptism.

Ephesians 4:5

"One Lord, one faith, one baptism."

Your Catholic baptism gives you two baptisms. You are still living in the Jewish age, not the Church age. Yet, you claim to live in the Church age?

For the rest of us?

We know that we can not have two baptisms in the Church age. So, we correct our thinking when we see that the tradition passed down by men is wrong.

The water baptisms we read about in the very beginning of the Church age were done in error. I can understand why. For they were yet thinking like they did before the Church age began. They had to learn the totally new way that they had been baptized into once the Church age began.

If more Catholics would only correct themselves when they see what the Word says? I think the Catholic church would win a lot more converts.

1 Corinthians 10:2 niv

"They were all baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea."



Ephesians 4:5

"One Lord, one faith, one baptism."



Grace and truth, GeneZ



It is very clear to me that you know NOTHING about Catholic Baptism.
so it is in-vain that you offer "correctins".
If I were to follow your advice, we would both end up in a ditch.

:D
 
Upvote 0

Schroeder

Veteran
Jun 10, 2005
3,234
69
OHIO. home of THE Ohio State Buckeyes
✟26,248.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Well then, we have a language problem. You said that he spoke wrongly and acted wrongly, concerning baptism and with his behavior towards the gentiles. You are making an equivocation.
You also said that the pharisees "got the best of him". I will not argue about what you and others have plainly said....it's all here.

http://www.christianforums.com/showpost.php?p=27538359&postcount=795
i did not say or write the word water baptism did I, I said he did act wrongly and spoke wrong IF he acted wrongly, scripture says he did. He was letting the pharisees get to him and he neglected to associate wih the gentiles because they were not jews in which i think you have to be water baptized and circumsised to become one. But to become a Christian you do not have to do such things only believe and accept Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Schroeder

Veteran
Jun 10, 2005
3,234
69
OHIO. home of THE Ohio State Buckeyes
✟26,248.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Romans Chapter 6

1. What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin that grace might increase?
2. May it never be! How shall we who died to sin still live in it?
3. Or do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus have been baptized into His death?
4. Therefore we have been buried with Him through baptism into death, in order that as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life.
5. For if we have become united with Him in the likeness of His death, certainly we shall be also in the likeness of His resurrection,
6. knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him, that our body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves to sin;
7. for he who has died is freed from sin.

One is not "buried" in the Spirit; but one is buriied when immersed in water. We are buried with Him through immersion in water.

Rich
you are not buried in water either so what is your point, your gotten wet in water. IMMERSED also means to be overwhelmed or fully covered. you STILL dont seem to get that this can happen unphysically. We are buried with Him because when HE is in us we become part of him and if we are part of him we also have been buried with Him. HE IS NOT talking about a act or rite we do to REMEMBER His death BUT the ACTUAL event of the SPiriut baptism or the moment of our Salvation. it says we are raised by the SPirit just as God raised Him by the SPirit rom 8:11. verse 6 should help you see this. he is speaking of our sinfull nature, coll2:11 as you see in that passage it is Christ through the SPirit. and the way it is done is through the SPirit baptism which is why it say we are CLOTHED in Christ. this is what IMMERSION does. not water baptism. we are litteraly (figurativly)wearing the SPirit of Christ. he is our new birth.
 
Upvote 0

Rich48

Legend
Aug 3, 2004
38,277
4,035
77
✟76,175.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
you are not buried in water either so what is your point, your gotten wet in water. IMMERSED also means to be overwhelmed or fully covered. you STILL dont seem to get that this can happen unphysically. We are buried with Him because when HE is in us we become part of him and if we are part of him we also have been buried with Him. HE IS NOT talking about a act or rite we do to REMEMBER His death BUT the ACTUAL event of the SPiriut baptism or the moment of our Salvation. it says we are raised by the SPirit just as God raised Him by the SPirit rom 8:11. verse 6 should help you see this. he is speaking of our sinfull nature, coll2:11 as you see in that passage it is Christ through the SPirit. and the way it is done is through the SPirit baptism which is why it say we are CLOTHED in Christ. this is what IMMERSION does. not water baptism. we are litteraly (figurativly)wearing the SPirit of Christ. he is our new birth.

I beg to differ! When you are "under the water", you are indeed "buried". When one in under water, there is nothing else-no knowledge of anthing that is above the water. It is as if you are dead; which is exactly the point that Paul is making. You are dead to your sins, and then raised to new life! :clap:

Rich
 
Upvote 0

Schroeder

Veteran
Jun 10, 2005
3,234
69
OHIO. home of THE Ohio State Buckeyes
✟26,248.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
[



Jesus Christ it is who came through water and blood--- not in water only,

but in water and in blood. .....It is THE SPIRIT who testifies to this, and THE SPIRIT is Truth.


Thus there are three that testify, the Spirit and the water and the blood----

and these three are of ONE ACCORD.



Do we not accept human testimony ?

The testimony of God is much greater:

it is the testimony God has given on his own Son's behalf.

Whoever believes in the Son of God possesses that testimony within his heart.

Whoever does not believe God has made God a liar by refusing to believe in the testimony he has given on his own Son's behalf.



The testimony is this:

God has given us eternal life, and this life is in his Son,

WHOEVER POSSESSES THE SON POSSESSES LIFE:

Whoever does not possess the Son of God does not possess life. 1 John 5: 6-12
have you looked up OTHER passages that speak of this. appaently not. i believe in John there is written an account of one seeing and saying this same wording about his blood and water, the spear in his side. that he DID DIE. which is why it say we have a greater witness then man. john 19:34-37. IT fullfilled PROPHECY not instituted a rite. we POSSES is life when we RECEIVE the SPIRIT(which is Christ) gal 3:5,14,22,29 says WHAT eph 1:13-14 SAY WHAT. you are still cherry picking scripture. again you prove yourself wrong. i MIGHT add that verse 8 which speaks of what you believe is of water baptism and life are found ONLY in very late manuscripts.




It pays to double check that ONE POSSESSES THE SON.....

by double-checking verses 6 and 7...
Making sure we possess Him in Spirit and in water and in blood .
(the testimony God has given)
TRUE and NOTHING About water baptism that io see unless you wish to squeeze them unhonestly. how and where does it say we POSSES HIm in SPirit water and blood. NOWHERE. finish the passage as in verse 13. these things i have written that have BELIEVED(not believed and done rites and sacraments) that you may know you have eternal life.. sounds a lot like eph 1:13-14 john 3:16 and MANY others.
otherwise,

such a one does not possess life.




Who in their right mind would want to eliminate.....


The Holy Spirit
or
the water,
or
the blood ?


I think only a stupid person would.
or a proud person.
why so rude. why the need to call me STUPID.
 
Upvote 0

Schroeder

Veteran
Jun 10, 2005
3,234
69
OHIO. home of THE Ohio State Buckeyes
✟26,248.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I beg to differ! When you are "under the water", you are indeed "buried". When one in under water, there is nothing else-no knowledge of anthing that is above the water. It is as if you are dead; which is exactly the point that Paul is making. You are dead to your sins, and then raised to new life! :clap:

Rich
read coll 2:11-23 rom 8:11 HE says the SPIRIT which is Christ is what gives us a NEW BIRTH or destroys the controll of the sinfull nature. It is because the Spirit is in us. gal 3:2 and eph 1:13-14 says we receive this SPirit when we BELIEVE on his SOn which is what Jesus said GOd says is HIS WORK that is reguired john 6:28-29. in Batism(Spirit) we are CLOTHED with Christ, BECAUSE he takes over our nature,or should. That is what he is speaking about in rom 6 OUR SINFUL nature, SOO we should look up what is spoken about in other passages of our sinfull nature. TRY IT. And how it is done away with. and notice it says baptized INTO Christ have been Baptized INTO his death. does it make more since to say water baptizes or done a rite INTO or simply IMMERSED INTO HIm and His death. we included JOINED. this happens when we become a PART of Him or He a part of us. WHEN THE SPIRIT OVERWHELMES US AND OUR SINFUL NATURE. this is immersed INTO Christ. So if you look at scripture dealing with When we receive the SPirit of Christ and what is spoken of our sinfull nature you see water baptism a rite is not the point being made or the way our sinfull nature is done away with. FOr we can NOT DO any ACT to accomplish this HINCE GRACE.
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,169
1,377
75
Atlanta
✟109,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
But I am not a blood descendant of Abraham. And neither were those in the congregation of Corinth who were baptized by Paul.

So, Paul and I disagree with you.

It was the Jewish believer's way of thinking of bringing the Gentiles into what was acceptable - the "Jewish" faith. Peter saw it as an initiation into what the Gentiles, up until then, had been denied. They had no concept of "Christianity" in the beginning. Jesus was the JEWISH Messiah, intended for the Jewish people. To water baptize the Gentiles was to bring them into what they had been denied before the baptism of the Holy Spirit. Before then, Gentiles who believed in the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, were viewed by the Jews as half breeds. Second class believers. The Gentiles were refused entrance into the inner court of the Temple under Judaism. Baptism was a means to bringing them up in standing in acceptance to the Jew.

Acts 10:47-48 (New International Version)
"Can anyone keep these people from being baptized with water? They have received the Holy Spirit just as we have." So he ordered that they be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked Peter to stay with them for a few days."
Peter and the Jews were getting over their looking down on Gentiles. Water baptism was a Jewish ritual. This gesture was showing acceptance of Gentiles as equals as Jews.

I believe this is why God allowed the water baptism error to continue for a while. For it expedited greatly the acceptance of Gentiles by the Jewish believers. It brought them together in close contact while performing a sacred Jewish ritual.

Mind you. For a Jew to accept a Gentile in this way? Would by like a KKK member offering a pot luck supper for a black neighborhood. The prejudices created by the previous law ran very deep. By God allowing water baptism to continue for a season it created an environment for the quick acceptance of Gentiles into the fold.

"Can anyone keep these people from being baptized with water? They have received the Holy Spirit just as we have."
What we miss here, is the Jewish thinking of how they viewed the Gentiles prior to the baptism of the Spirit.

"Can we keep this people from becoming like one of us???"

We tend today to view this through a filter of our own cultural lense. Jews saw Gentiles like Muslims see Jews today. Not with murderous intent as the Muslims do. But as being so inferior to what they believe. It was a hard pill to swallow by the Jews. Gentiles speaking in tongues after being baptized in the Spirit was a sign of acceptance to those Jews who also received that gift.

"Can anyone keep these people from being baptized with water?

Under normal circumstances? The Jews would have never offered water baptism to a Gentile. No more than allow for a Gentile to enter into the inner court of the Temple. This was culture shock for the Jewish believers. God wanted them to get over it in a hurry. It would be like you being seated at a dinner table in some Asian country and being told you were about to eat dog.

Grace and peace, GeneZ
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,169
1,377
75
Atlanta
✟109,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
why so rude. why the need to call me STUPID.

Religious pride, perhaps? Its a sign of a proud spirit. One led of his emotions, and not the Spirit.

When someone tells you...

I think only a stupid person would.
or a proud person.

That is not rebuking you with Scripture which can feel insulting when one is on the wrong side of the truth. That is elevating one's own opinion to the level of Scripture.

That is how the Pharisees treated Christ and the disciples. They were certain that their religious ritual was from God. And, that is why so much debate goes on. For its religion versus Sola Scriptura. Religion makes its own rules, then demands all follow them religiously.

In Christ, GeneZ
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.