I can't speak for the rest of the population, but I've cried foul when police have been wrong. I did so for Eric Garner. I believe the officer(s) involved should've been indicted. That being said, I also respect the grand jury's decision.
I don't respect the decision as I consider it both incorrect and largely harmful.
The mayor said enough for the anti-police crowd (remember, the ones calling for violence) to feel empowered by their anger.
So what exactly was wrong with what he said?
I don't need to do anything to taint my "opposition" (whoever that might be). Their own words are proof.
Obviously you do, since you just took another swipe at the Mayor who didn't call for any violence.
Nor has anyone I know here EVER taken a "police can do no wrong" position.
The police are indeed taking that position both legally and politically.
Literally turning their backs on and blaming the mayor for the actions of a murderer because he disagreeing with their practices, heard out the protesters and admitting to racial differences in policing...
But I sure have seen MANY people take the "police officers are pigs and deserve to die" stance here. Reference Protocol's post(s). I see you grant him one or two sentences of lecture, while giving me paragraph upon paragraph of why I'm wrong.
The disparity is rather obvious, Variant.
Would you rather a quick acrid dismissal of you and all you stand for or a more involved discussion of someone who disagrees and is irritated with you but is willing to talk further?
But to be fair you are getting more posts because you are spending more time defending yourself. I do feel rather dismissive about your intention to blame people who disagree with you and have not called for violence for violence, you've done so several times now.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
