In response to the OP, a pesky little thing called genetic limitations. Examples:
A horse and a donkey can be bred..... once. The outcome is a sterile crossbreed. The females are almost always sterile and the male is ALWAYS sterile. There will never be a reproducing population of horse/donkey mixes. This is the end of their genetic limitation.
Dogs and foxes cannot interbreed.
Many creatures that would seem to be very close anotomcally, cannot mingle. There are genetic limitations.
Of course, to the evolutionist, a cow can eventually become a whale over "long periods of time" and somehow that's "scientific", but what we see in the real world is that there are limitations on how far an animal can actually go.
You are of course looking at this backwards (no suprises there then).
The genetic limitation you speak of is an incompatability caused by genetic changes in isolated populations.
When you have some evidence for a 'genetic limitation' caused by an 'intelligent designer' then maybe you should educate us.
Until then, i suggest you should learn some biology before you comment on it.
You start with ecoli you end up with ecoli. No new species has been found, created or discovered. Even after 50,000 generations. You can have descent, you can have modification. There is no descent with modification.
This can so easily be disproved, you could do it yourself.
Get a DNA testing kit, take a sample from you and either a parent or one of your offspring.
Send it off to the lab.
The will be able to show that the child has descended form the parent, yet is not identical. To be fair, you could make an approximation of this just by using your eyes - you look like your parents, but not exactly the same.
Therefore, you have - wait for it - descent with modification.
In one generation of a sexully reproducing organism.
Otherwise, we would all be clones....
Evos become good at ignoring the evidence. Because the evidence clearly shows their theory is bogus. You can have modification, you can have descent. But you can not put the two of them together and come up with anything.
Show us the evidence to back up your erroneous claim then.
The new heaven and the new earth will have lots of precious metals and stones.
And I am supposed to belive this why exactly?
Is this your best attempt to defend your theory and what you believe? Cutting edge research includes science daily. Do you have a problem with Science Daily? There is no conflict between Science and the Bible. Science can not falsify the Bible in any way. May people come to a saving knowledge of the truth by failing in their attempt to prove the Bible wrong. They come to the realization that the Bible is true.
The bible tells us that we can move mountains with faith.
Science tells us we cannot.
Faith tells you there is a god - common sense should tell you that you don't need one.