Exactly the plan. There is no liability under the continuing EUA for Pfizer. There isn't any "Conmirnaty" yet, so no one is using it. It will not be shielded unless they can convince enough people that children must be forced to take it.That way the mandates can roll out but they're still not liable at this point. Pretty slick operation.
I'm not convinced you're actually waiting for evidence.
I think it's very telling that senior FDA officials are starting to step down. Supposedly it's about the booster shots but certainly one can speculate there's more going on.
CDC calling the shots on the FDA's approval of boosters? Nothing to see here, folks, just good old science at work.
Exactly. And people still want to believe that the CDC hasn't lost credibility.
But they're doing their best to make up for it by appealing to wokeness:
CDC's 'woke' new language guide proposes replacing 'dehumanizing' words like ELDERLY | Daily Mail Online
I posted about this as well on another thread. Between that, stepping into gun control conversation and the rental mandates, I'm like what is going on??? I stated that they stepped out of their lane ages ago and who knows when they'll be back. And apparently some at the FDA are realizing it as well.
No, it was mainly the fact you felt the need to post rumors as if they were convincing that drove my skepticism.Here, I'll even post a picture of me waiting for your evidence:
Convinced now?
Specifically, the Director and Deputy Director of the FDA's Office of Vaccines Research and Review. Two at the top specifically relating to the vaccine approval process. The director was at the FDA for over 30 years before resigning due to this.
Wow, someone near the end of their career is retiring? Obviously signs of a nefarious conspiracy. Next thing you'll know women will start taking time off mid-career to raise families, and we all know how that proves the moon landings were a hoax.
And the deputy director with 10 years of service. Both cited CDC overreach and lack of FDA independence as their reasoning.
OK, connect the dots for us. What do the resignations say about safety and effectiveness of the vaccines currently in use? Please be specific.
And what specific overreach are you alleging?They say that the decisions aren't being made by the FDA as they have been in the past. They are an indication of CDC overreach in the vaccine approval process of the Covid vaccines.
And what specific overreach are you alleging?
No, I'm just trying to figure out what the big deal is. No one seems to be able to give specifics, but that doesn't seem to stop the innuendo about conspiracies or jumping to conclusions that it must mean there's something being hidden about the vaccine.That you seem to ignore all red flags and pretend there's nothing to see has been patently obvious throughout our discussions.
No, it was mainly the fact you felt the need to post rumors as if they were convincing that drove my skepticism.
You were in favor of Harry doing that, right?
I appreciate it when people read.It appears that there are two separate authorizations, one full approval for 16 and older, and an emergency approval fir 12 and older and third doses. In the new emergency approval, footnote 8 refers to this, saying that the regularly approved and emergency approved vaccines are the same, and can be used interchangeably.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?