EchoPneuma
Well-Known Member
Fine Linen, was it you that I was debating with a few months ago regarding universal salvation?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
A half truth, is a whole lie.FineLinen said:[SIZE=-1]*snip* Irrelevant bloviation omitted.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]The subjunctive mood indicates action that is possible or potential.
3. Subjunctive Mood.
This is the mood of probability. It implies some doubt as to the reality of the action. It expresses an uncertainty of an action which may or may not happen.[/SIZE]
Just wondering here, Why did you title your post "Using the BDB" ? It appears to be talking about the BDAG rather than the BDB.Der Alter said:Using the BDB
EchoPneuma said:Fine Linen, was it you that I was debating with a few months ago regarding universal salvation?
FineLinen said:
Bingo...however I have at last come to my senses.
Our heavenly Father hates His creation and anticipates keeping it locked in disobedience and misery for the endless ages, for.....
[move]From Him everything comes, through Him everything exists, and in Him less than everything ends. Potential Source, potential Guide, potential Goal of all that is, Amen![/move]
ExecellentEchoPneuma said:I think that pretty much shows the whole context of the bible about universal salvation. Yet, those who believe in ET want to take a few verses out of the NT and because of MISTRANSLATED greek words, cling to a belief in an eternal hell...and ignore all these verses to the contrary.
SS quotes:
and round and round we go.
Looks like there is no point in attempting to talk with you on this subject at all.
So in his great mercy he neither forgives nor accepts due payment according to you?
Ok so where is my error?
SS quotes:
By your reasoning if someone at somepoint has committed blasphemy then from that point on they should feel totally free to commit any and every sin they can think of for the punishement will be the same if it is done once or 1 million times, if it is thier only sin or if it is the first of millions no difference according to you.
Have you not said that if a person blasphemes the HS they will never be forgiven?
Have you not also said that there is no way to make amends or pay for this sin?
Have you not also indicated that the same will suffer an eternity in hell?
Is it possible to suffer a greater penalty?
What is the penalty if one comits the act of blasphemy more than once?, more than 100 times?, a million?
Do other sins combined with this one or many add to the eternity of punishment somehow?
Is what I said a logical fallacy as you state or is it exactly on the mark of what you have been saying?
This is an old post, you were not there for the conversation, everything is subject to intent.FineLinen said:
Tim, a couple of questions for you regarding damnation?
1. Is all damnation equal?
2. Is the elect House of God subject to eternal damnation?
3. Is the greater damnation of the Scribes and Pharisee's the same greater damnation as those described by the Apostle James as "my brothers", specifically teachers?
4. What is damnation?
[move]"Assuredly the Bible is not the story of sin, deepening into eternal ruin, of God's Son worsted in His utmost effort; it is from the opening to the close the story of grace stronger than sin--of life victorious over every form of death--of God triumphing over evil."[/move]
daneel said:You can ask a thousand times and I'll still give the simple direct answer. If you're looking for a deep meaning to the one unforgiveable sin, then you look too far.
Merzbow said:Daneel, you didn't answer my question. How can you resolve the doctrine (which I presume you hold) of sola fide with the supposed existence of the unforgivable sin? It's impossible. Otherwise you have to admit that any man who speaks against the Holy Spirit as a non-Christian, and then is turned to Christ and professes and has faith in him, cannot be saved.
And my point about Paul was not that he did this as Paul, but potentially as Saul. Unless Saul was a very polite, very soft-spoken persecutor of Christians.
Der Alter said:Another poster boy for Universalism. Again, NOT!
Clement of Alexandria VI.-From the Book on the Soul.
All souls are immortal, even those of the wicked, for whom it were better that they were not deathless. For, punished with the endless vengeance of quenchless fire, and not dying, it is impossible for them to have a, period put to their misery.
http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/ANF-02/anf02-79.htm#P10261_2871673
Clement of Alexandria Exhortation to the Heathen
For the author of evil, torment has been prepared; and so the prophet Zecharias threatens him: “He that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee; lo, is not this a brand plucked from the fire?” What an infatuated desire, then, for voluntary death is this, rooted in men’s minds! Why do they flee to this fatal brand, with which they shall be burned, when it is within their power to live nobly according to God, and not according to custom? For God bestows life freely; but evil custom, after our departure from this world, brings on the sinner unavailing remorse with punishment.
http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/ANF-02/anf02-50.htm#P2691_785581
Clement of Alexandria Who is the Rich Man that Shall Be Saved?
For though sparing, and aiming at testing, who will receive meritoriously or not, it is possible for you to neglect some that are loved by God; the penalty for which is the punishment of eternal fire.
http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/ANF-02/anf02-86.htm#P10493_2903393
And, as I think, the Saviour also exerts His might because it is His work to save; which accordingly He also did by drawing to salvation those who became willing, by the preaching [of the Gospel], to believe on Him, wherever they were. If, then, the Lord descended to Hades for no other end but to preach the Gospel, as He did descend; it was either to preach the Gospel to all or to the Hebrews only. If, accordingly, to all, then all who believe shall be saved, although they may be of the Gentiles, on making their profession there; since God's punishments are saving and disciplinary, leading to conversion, and choosing rather the repentance thorn the death of a sinner; and especially since souls, although darkened by passions, when released from their bodies, are able to perceive more clearly, because of their being no longer obstructed by the paltry flesh.
And how is He Saviour and Lord, if not the Saviour and Lord of all? But He is the Saviour of those who have believed, because of their l wishing to know; and the Lord of those who have not believed, till, being enabled to confess him, they obtain the peculiar and appropriate boon which comes by Him....
For all things are arranged with a view to the salvation of the universe by the Lord of the universe, both generally and particularly. It is then the function of the righteousness of salvation to improve everything as far as practicable. For even minor marten are arranged with a view to the salvation of that which is better, and for an abode suitable for people's character. Now everything that is virtuous changes for the better; having as the proper cause of change the free choice of knowledge, which the soul has in its own power. But necessary corrections, through the goodness of the great overseeing Judge, both by the attendant angels, and by various acts of anticipative judgment, and by the perfect judgment, compel egregious sinners to repent.
EchoPneuma said:Just wanted to let you know that I did as I said I would. I took it all to the Lord in much prayer and study, and the Lord changed my mind about universal salvation. I now see that it truly is what the bible teaches.
Remember I was struggling with WANTING to believe it, but I just couldn't see it. Now I can because God has helped me.
Just wanted to share that with you. I remember we had a good conversation and ended on a high note....
Merzbow said:Daneel, you didn't answer my question. How can you resolve the doctrine (which I presume you hold) of sola fide with the supposed existence of the unforgivable sin? It's impossible. Otherwise you have to admit that any man who speaks against the Holy Spirit as a non-Christian, and then is turned to Christ and professes and has faith in him, cannot be saved.
And my point about Paul was not that he did this as Paul, but potentially as Saul. Unless Saul was a very polite, very soft-spoken persecutor of Christians.
katallasso said:Are we getting off the subject with the unpardonable sin? Sure would hate to see this thread kiboshed by those with the cute mod hates on.
Der Alter said:Gregory of Nyssa, poster boy for Universalism, or is he?
Volume V. Gregory of Nyssa: Dogmatic Treatises; Select Writings and Letters
"In the treatise, De Pauperibus Amandis, II. p. 240, he says of the last judgment that God will give to each his due; repose eternal to those who have exercised pity and a holy life; but the eternal punishment of fire for the harsh and unmerciful: and addressing the rich who have made a bad use of their riches, he says, 'Who will extinguish the flames ready to devour you and engulf you? Who will stop the gnawings of a worm that never dies?'"
http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/NPNF2-05/Npnf2-05-07.htm#P180_18498
But when it has passed away, what follows? That God will be "all in all." Gregory accepts the whole of Origen's explanation of this great text. Both insist on the impossibility of God being in `everything,' if evil still remains. But this is equivalent to the restoration to their primitive state of all created spirits. Still it must be remembered that Origen required many future stages of existence before all could arrive at such a consummation: with him there is to be more than one `next world;' and even when the primitive perfection is reached, his peculiar view of the freedom of the will, as an absolute balance between good and evil, would admit the possibility of another fall. `All may be saved; and all may fall.' How the final Sabbath shall come in which all wills shall rest at last is but dimly hinted at in his writings. With Gregory, on the other hand, there are to be but two worlds: the present and the next; and in the next the apokatastasij twn pantwn must be effected. Then, after the Resurrection, the fire akoimhtoj, aiwnioj, as he continually calls it, will have to do its work. `The avenging flame will be the more ardent the more it has to consume' (De Anima et Resurr., p. 227). `But at last the evil will be annihilated, and the bad saved by nearness to the good.' There is to rise a giving of thanks from all nature. Nevertheless21 passages have been adduced from Gregory's writings in which the language of Scripture as to future punishment is used without any modification, or hint of this universal salvation. <insert above partial quote>
Severe and long-continued pains in eternity are thus decreed to sinners, not because God hates them, nor for the sake alone of punishing them; but "because what belongs to God must at any cost be preserved for Him. The degree of pain which must be endured by each one is necessarily proportioned to the measure of the wickedness.
In any and every case evil must be removed out of existence, so that, as we said above, the absolutely non-existent should cease to be at all. Since it is not in its nature that evil should exist outside the will, does it not follow that when it shall be that every will rests in God, evil will be reduced to complete annihilation, owing to no receptacle being left for it?