DOJ finds no evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome: Attorney General Bill Barr

[Hans Blaster]

40,270 moved county lines.

That's a lot of boundary changes. Is Georgia going to need to distribute new maps?

 

[chad kincham]

Ah, I see. You only claim election fraud cause your religious belief makes you think Trump would be a better president.

Telling lies for Jesus.

That and a truckload of evidence that’s growing larger everyday.

 

[chad kincham]

That's a lot of boundary changes. Is Georgia going to need to distribute new maps?

Im sure they moved across county lines.

 

[chad kincham]

Not to mention the death threats they are sending.

-CryptoLutheran

Bull.

I’m tired of hearing the same old crap from lefties pretending like conservatives are violent.

73 million very peed-off Trump supporters and not one single building or car has been burned.

 

[Belk]

That and a truckload of evidence that’s growing larger everyday.

Do let us know when one of the court cases acknowledge this "truckload" of evidence.

 

[chad kincham]

Rudy goes about claiming "votes were switched by Dominion", but then, when asked about a hand recount he says stuff about "you'll be counting the same fraudulent votes".

Because that’s exactly what they did, making the recount a joke, since they still didn’t match or check signatures on the mail-in ballots, and still kept Republican observers from being able to do any meaningful observations - thus they just recounted the same mix of fake and real ballots.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Because that’s exactly what they did, making the recount a joke

So you agree then, that the Dominion voting systems, generally speaking, accurately recorded the votes that were cast?

 

[chad kincham]

Do let us know when one of the court cases acknowledge this "truckload" of evidence.

No problem.

Already the state legislatures of PA, GA and MI have heard hours of testimony and evidence, and the PA state legislature is currently working to overturn the certification for Biden, after the hearing.

But of course you’ve heard zip about any of that.

 

[VirOptimus]

That and a truckload of evidence that’s growing larger everyday.

There is no credible evidence, look at the court records.

Donald lost, get over it.

 

[camille70]

So you agree then, that the Dominion voting systems, generally speaking, accurately recorded the votes that were cast?

It was accurate and when the votes are cast, it gives a print out for review before voters turn them in. If the machines where changing tallies, then the electronic info would not match the printed information when hand counts are done.

That said, I don't 100% trust anything, and I'm hoping dems get control of the senate so they can finally pass election security measures so that the integrity of future elections will not be in doubt. The GOP had 4 years and acted upon nothing for fear of Trump taking it personally.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...mpossible-for-their-machines-to-switch-votes/

 

[chad kincham]

So you agree then, that the Dominion voting systems, generally speaking, accurately recorded the votes that were cast?

The dominion user guide is online, and it was designed to steal elections, per a litany of computer and ex military intelligence officers who’ve testified and given sworn affidavits about, and per chapter 11 of the user guide which shows how it’s done, in black and white.

Dominion user guide


https://www.oann.com/files/UG-RTR-UserGuide-5-11-CO.pdf#page77


Look at chapter 11 which shows how to manipulate votes.


Look for the RCV (ranked choice voting) Method: This will select the specific method of tabulating RCV votes to elect a winner, the following methods of cheating are supported:


• IRV: Instant Runoff-Voting.


• STV: Single Transferable Voting, more specifically the Weighted Inclusive Gregory Method, which implements fractional surplus transfer of elected candidates.


• Points IRV: a modified form of Instant Run-off Voting where ranked choice voting results are evaluated on a district per district basis and each district has a set number of points (100). Elimination and declaration of winners is done on basis of points, not votes.

 

[chad kincham]

That said, I don't 100% trust anything, and I'm hoping dems get control of the senate so they can finally pass election security measures so that the integrity of future elections will not be in doubt. The GOP had 4 years and acted upon nothing for fear of Trump taking it personally.

That’s exactly backwards.

The Republicans want voter photo ID and other measures, the Democrats claim that’s racist.

In fact the Democrats have purposely undone security measures in the states currently under dispute, such as using signature matching on mail-in ballots which are essential to do - as Obama and Jimmy Carter have said in the past, for just two examples.

 

[chad kincham]

.

 

[chad kincham]

I see that you are still failing at statistics. Too bad that you do not understand that to do a percentage that one can play project that one needs a much larger sample size.

Sorry, but the number is still 2.

BTW as an FYI:

Plate Tectonics Subducted?
In the Fall 2000 number of the Journal of Scientific Exploration, D. Pratt fired a thunderous broadside at that revered paradigm of geophysics: plate tectonics, nee continental drift. This 47-page study, which includes 10 pages of references, is best summarized by quoting from the author's own conclusions.

Plate tectonics -- the reigning paradigm in the earth sciences -- faces some very severe and apparently fatal problems. Far from being a simple, elegant, all-embracing global theory, it is confronted with a multitude of observational anomalies and has had to be patched up with a complex variety of ad hoc modifications and auxiliary hypotheses. The existence of deep continental roots and the absence of a continuous, global asthenosphere to "lubricate" plate motions has rendered the classical model of plate movements untenable. There is no consensus on the thickness of the "plates" and no certainty as to the forces responsible for their supposed movement. The hypotheses of large-scale continental movements, seafloor spreading, and subduction , as well as the relative youth of the oceanic crust are contradicted by a substantial volume of data. Evidence for significant amounts of submerged continental crust in the present-day oceans provides another major challenge to plate tectonics.
(Pratt, David ; "Plate Tectonics: A Paradigm under Threat ," Journal of Scientific Exploration," 14:307, 2000.)

 

[camille70]

That’s exactly backwards.

The Republicans want voter photo ID and other measures, the Democrats claim that’s racist.

In fact the Democrats have purposely undone security measures in the states currently under dispute, such as using signature matching on mail-in ballots which are essential to do - as Obama and Jimmy Carter have said in the past, for just two examples.

Photo ID in and of itself is not the issue. It's the way it has been implemented to disenfranchise voters. Not everyone can afford an ID and places that supposedly made them free, made them difficult to get, closing local DMV/BMV's, changing hours etc. Laws were changed to make it easier for their desired population to vote. For instance allowing gun license but not student id's. None of the poll workers are trained to confirm identities, just like they are not trained to identify signature issues. They just make sure the information matches the registration. I'm not going down this rabbit hole again, as it has been discussed in depth before.


ACLU News & Commentary

 

[chad kincham]

If a nation of 330 million people votes of course there is fraud.

Some wife beater threatens her to change a vote to his candidate. Fraud.

Is it meaningful on large scale ? No.

Just one of many forensic analysis that has been done resulting in sworn affidavits:

Williams College Mathematician Flags up to 100,000 Ballots in Pennsylvania
BY JACK PHILLIPS
November 20, 2020 Updated: November 21, 2020
Print
A professor of mathematics at Williams College, in a sworn affidavit, flagged nearly 100,000 ballots in Pennsylvania after analyzing election data and phone interviews.

Steven Miller, who specializes in analytic number theory and sabermetrics, said that one instance of possible fraud involved potential votes that weren’t counted and another instance involved ballots that may have been requested by a person other than the GOP-registered voter.

“I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801,” Miller said in the sworn statement (pdf), according to Just The News.

Elaborating, Miller said that “almost surely, the number of ballots requested by someone other than the registered Republican is between 37,001 and 58,914,” and that “almost surely the number of ballots requested by registered Republicans and returned but not counted is in the range from 38,910 to 56,483.”

Pennsylvania’s state data for early and absentee ballot requests showed 165,412 ballots requested in the names of registered GOP voters that were not counted as of Nov. 16, Miller stated.

Data shows Democratic nominee Joe Biden is ahead of President Donald Trump by around 80,000 votes in Pennsylvania.

Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor, an appointee of Trump, told the news outlet that Miller’s affidavit is evidence of potential voter fraud.

“This data, which is provided by an expert witness, who would be qualified in almost any court in the country, adds to the conclusions that some level of voter fraud took place in this year’s election,” Trainor remarked. “Therefore, the rush to certify results that are this suspicious from places with known election violations would nullify millions of votes that were legally cast by individual voters.”

Miller, who was educated at Yale and Princeton, said he analyzed data from Pennsylvania’s election that was collected by Matt Braynard, who formerly worked for the Trump campaign, and conducted 2,684 voter interviews by a phone bank.

The American Mathematical Society in 2019 saidMiller was included in its class of fellows “for contributions to number theory and service to the mathematical community, particularly in support of mentoring undergraduate research.”

Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar’s office has not responded to a request for comment.

Boockvar’s office previously said it has found no evidence of voter fraud or mass irregularities in Pennsylvania, while other secretaries of state in Arizona, Georgia, and Michigan have said the same. Earlier this week, the Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity division said the Nov. 3 election was the “most secure” in U.S. history, saying there is “no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.”

Trump’s legal team, however, has said they have found enough evidence to potentially overturn the election.

 

[chad kincham]

Photo ID in and of itself is not the issue. It's the way it has been implemented to disenfranchise voters. Not everyone can afford an ID and places that supposedly made them free, made them difficult to get, closing local DMV/BMV's, changing hours etc. Laws were changed to make it easier for their desired population to vote. For instance allowing gun license but not student id's. None of the poll workers are trained to confirm identities, just like they are not trained to identify signature issues. They just make sure the information matches the registration. I'm not going down this rabbit hole again, as it has been discussed in depth before.

That scenario is bogus.

I remember one state requiring voter ID offered to pick up people and take them to get it, but that still wasn’t good enough for the liberal activists.

 

[Subduction Zone]

No problem.

Already the state legislatures of PA, GA and MI have heard hours of testimony and evidence, and the PA state legislature is currently working to overturn the certification for Biden, after the hearing.

But of course you’ve heard zip about any of that.

Because it has not happened. Though there are a few dishonest loons in state legislatures most of them are honest.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Just one of many forensic analysis that has been done resulting in sworn affidavits:

Williams College Mathematician Flags up to 100,000 Ballots in Pennsylvania
BY JACK PHILLIPS
November 20, 2020 Updated: November 21, 2020
Print
A professor of mathematics at Williams College, in a sworn affidavit, flagged nearly 100,000 ballots in Pennsylvania after analyzing election data and phone interviews.

Steven Miller, who specializes in analytic number theory and sabermetrics, said that one instance of possible fraud involved potential votes that weren’t counted and another instance involved ballots that may have been requested by a person other than the GOP-registered voter.

“I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801,” Miller said in the sworn statement (pdf), according to Just The News.

Elaborating, Miller said that “almost surely, the number of ballots requested by someone other than the registered Republican is between 37,001 and 58,914,” and that “almost surely the number of ballots requested by registered Republicans and returned but not counted is in the range from 38,910 to 56,483.”

Pennsylvania’s state data for early and absentee ballot requests showed 165,412 ballots requested in the names of registered GOP voters that were not counted as of Nov. 16, Miller stated.

Data shows Democratic nominee Joe Biden is ahead of President Donald Trump by around 80,000 votes in Pennsylvania.

Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor, an appointee of Trump, told the news outlet that Miller’s affidavit is evidence of potential voter fraud.

“This data, which is provided by an expert witness, who would be qualified in almost any court in the country, adds to the conclusions that some level of voter fraud took place in this year’s election,” Trainor remarked. “Therefore, the rush to certify results that are this suspicious from places with known election violations would nullify millions of votes that were legally cast by individual voters.”

Miller, who was educated at Yale and Princeton, said he analyzed data from Pennsylvania’s election that was collected by Matt Braynard, who formerly worked for the Trump campaign, and conducted 2,684 voter interviews by a phone bank.

The American Mathematical Society in 2019 saidMiller was included in its class of fellows “for contributions to number theory and service to the mathematical community, particularly in support of mentoring undergraduate research.”

Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar’s office has not responded to a request for comment.

Boockvar’s office previously said it has found no evidence of voter fraud or mass irregularities in Pennsylvania, while other secretaries of state in Arizona, Georgia, and Michigan have said the same. Earlier this week, the Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity division said the Nov. 3 election was the “most secure” in U.S. history, saying there is “no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.”

Trump’s legal team, however, has said they have found enough evidence to potentially overturn the election.

A "sworn statement" of a supposed expert is worthless when the expert is well outside of his area of expertise. Your so called expert is not an expert on how elections are done. He won't get in trouble because he probably did not lie. He really believes the unsupported nonsense that he spouted. That does not make it reliable or evidence.

 

[Subduction Zone]

BTW as an FYI:

Plate Tectonics Subducted?
In the Fall 2000 number of the Journal of Scientific Exploration, D. Pratt fired a thunderous broadside at that revered paradigm of geophysics: plate tectonics, nee continental drift. This 47-page study, which includes 10 pages of references, is best summarized by quoting from the author's own conclusions.

Plate tectonics -- the reigning paradigm in the earth sciences -- faces some very severe and apparently fatal problems. Far from being a simple, elegant, all-embracing global theory, it is confronted with a multitude of observational anomalies and has had to be patched up with a complex variety of ad hoc modifications and auxiliary hypotheses. The existence of deep continental roots and the absence of a continuous, global asthenosphere to "lubricate" plate motions has rendered the classical model of plate movements untenable. There is no consensus on the thickness of the "plates" and no certainty as to the forces responsible for their supposed movement. The hypotheses of large-scale continental movements, seafloor spreading, and subduction , as well as the relative youth of the oceanic crust are contradicted by a substantial volume of data. Evidence for significant amounts of submerged continental crust in the present-day oceans provides another major challenge to plate tectonics.
(Pratt, David ; "Plate Tectonics: A Paradigm under Threat ," Journal of Scientific Exploration," 14:307, 2000.)

LOL!! You really need to learn how to vet your sources. I have to use the term "loon" again so soon, but that source is a journal for loons. It is not a well respected professional journal:

"The Society for Scientific Exploration, or SSE, is a group committed to studying fringe science.[1] The opinions of the organization in regard to what are the proper limits of scientific exploration are often at odds with those of mainstream science.[2] Critics argue that the SSE is devoted to disreputable ideas far outside the scientific mainstream."

Society for Scientific Exploration - Wikipedia

Not understanding the concept of reliable evidence will sink one's arguments. I would suggest that you try to learn what is and what is not reliable evidence.