DOJ finds no evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome: Attorney General Bill Barr

[Subduction Zone]

How soon they forget. Trump was against mail in voting, even though it is safer due to Covid . He told his followers to vote at polling stations and most did. Biden is for the safety of his voters and was pro mail in ballot. Why are Republicans surprised when the mail in votes reflect this?

 

[chad kincham]

Gee, too bad they’re in recess now, huh?

Ever hear of a special session, from out there in your bubble?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Ever hear of a special session, from out there in your bubble?

I would suggest that you ease up on the projection.

 

[Hans Blaster]

You can claim that all day long. Experts claim otherwise.

What you’re ignorantly and naively failing to understand is it’s designed to cheat and get away with it.

The fact that it says you can break a tie manually, refutes you completely.

The winner can be picked manually, according to the users preference.

The fact that you also have the choice to break a tie by going back to any previous round that the one you want to win might have been ahead, and select that, refutes you completely, also.

You can’t spin it, it’s too obvious for you to obfuscate.

But no state reported results in this fashion. If they had their would either be: 1. Just two candidates listed with the winner having at least 50%, or 2. A table of second, third, etc. choice votes associated with each vote total.

That the equipment may be capable of other sorts of voting (other than single-vote, first past the post) does not imply that those modes were used.

 

[SimplyMe]

You can claim that all day long. Experts claim otherwise.

What you’re ignorantly and naively failing to understand is it’s designed to cheat and get away with it.

The fact that it says you can break a tie manually, refutes you completely.

The winner can be picked manually, according to the users preference.

The fact that you also have the choice to break a tie by going back to any previous round that the one you want to win might have been ahead, and select that, refutes you completely, also.

You can’t spin it, it’s too obvious for you to obfuscate.

That is nice. The fact remains, you still don't understand -- neither do the "experts" you are listening to. That the machines are "capable" of the things you claim doesn't change the fact that those "capabilities" have not been found to be used. Again, the state in contention that used the Dominion machines verified, through a hand recount, that the machines counted the vote honestly and accurately.

 

[chad kincham]

How soon they forget. Trump was against mail in voting, even though it is safer due to Covid . He told his followers to vote at polling stations and most did. Biden is for the safety of his voters and was pro mail in ballot. Why are Republicans surprised when the mail in votes reflect this?

Biden and the other corrupt Democrats are of course for the method of voting that is universally known to be the most vulnerable to rampant election fraud, and their intentions were obvious when they got a court order to skip the essential method for validating a mail-in ballot, that Democrats in the past have stated unequivocally is absolutely necessary.

But then Biden had that Freudian slip from his dementia, where he admitted they assembled the biggest voter fraud organization ever.

Obama talking about signature matching/verification.

Biden admitting voter fraud organization at 17 minutes into the video:

 

[chad kincham]

That is nice. The fact remains, you still don't understand -- neither do the "experts" you are listening to. That the machines are "capable" of the things you claim doesn't change the fact that those "capabilities" have not been found to be used. Again, the state in contention that used the Dominion machines verified, through a hand recount, that the machines counted the vote honestly and accurately.

Try to focus and pay attention: the software is designed to steal elections and leave behind no evidence.

That’s one reason Texas and other states looked at Dominion Voting Systems and declined to use them due to the many and obvious vulnerabilities.

But I’m not going to continue debating with an obvious partisan ideologue who is deliberately being obtuse.

 

[TLK Valentine]

This is after hearing over 6 hours of “non existent evidence” presented to the state legislature by Giuliani.

Funny story... people testifying to a legislative body usually do so under oath... but when a Democrat in Michigan suggested swearing Giuliani in, the Republican majority ruled him "out of order."

Needless to say, Giuliani was not sworn in. But 6 hours, you say? I suppose if one values quantity over quality...

They’ve now given evidence of election fraud to state legislatures in GA, MI, AZ and PA.

And diddly-squat to the courts... where it would make a difference.

PA legislatures now want to decertify the election there.

Now that it's too late to actually do it, Donald's supporters talk tough.

GA governor has now called for an actual recount where they verify signatures on mail in ballots, , instead of a pretend recount that didn’t use signature matching and thus recounted the same mixture of real and fraudulent ballots.

What fraudulent ballots?

 

[SimplyMe]

Try to focus and pay attention: the software is designed to steal elections and leave behind no evidence.

That’s one reason Texas and other states looked at Dominion Voting Systems and declined to use them due to the many and obvious vulnerabilities.

But I’m not going to continue debating with an obvious partisan ideologue who is deliberately being obtuse.

So what I hear is that you can't make any factual argument to counter what I said -- so instead you will personally attack me and restate the previous claims that don't apply in this case.

 

[Pommer]

Ever hear of a special session, from out there in your bubble?

I’m sure that the Democratic Governor there will get right on that.

 

[chad kincham]

Funny story... people testifying to a legislative body usually do so under oath... but when a Democrat in Michigan suggested swearing Giuliani in, the Republican majority ruled him "out of order."

Needless to say, Giuliani was not sworn in. But 6 hours, you say? I suppose if one values quantity over quality...



And diddly-squat to the courts... where it would make a difference.



Now that it's too late to actually do it, Donald's supporters talk tough.



What fraudulent ballots?

You’ve got to be kidding me!

Mail in ballots are known to be the easiest way to commit voter fraud that exists - and strict signature verification and comparison has to be used to verify ballots are from the actual voter and haven’t been “harvested”.

Yet they disabled the signature verification, on purpose, and even got a court order by a corrupt judge to violate the state constitution and omit that very important step.

Thus the recount that still didn’t use signature matching just recounted the same mix of phony and real ballots for a second time.

 

[chad kincham]

And diddly-squat to the courts... where it would make a difference.

They so obviously want to go to the SCOTUS.

Anyone who’s ever followed any important cases over many years knows they end up there.

 

[Pommer]

Try to focus and pay attention: the software is designed to steal elections and leave behind no evidence.

So, the software switches votes and then removes all evidence that this was done?

If someone goes and looks at it, it just “looks like” a “normal election”?

Or
Joe Biden legitimately got more votes than Donald J Trump, American?

 

[Hans Blaster]

Mail in ballots are known to be the easiest way to commit voter fraud that exists - and strict signature verification and comparison has to be used to verify ballots are from the actual voter and haven’t been “harvested”.

But ultimately we're not talking about voter fraud (when an individual votes fraudulently) we're talking about election fraud, the large scale fraud required to steal an election. Large scale election fraud isn't any more likely with individual voter fraud by mail-in ballots than with other forms. It still requires a great deal of coordination by a lot of cheaters each risking jail for a few fraudulent votes at most.

 

[HARK!]

MOD HAT ON

DUE TO MULTIPLE RULE VIOLATIONS

MOD HAT OFF​