And you are of course wrong again. This is not an opinion on my part but a conclusion based upon reading your posts. No matter how many times that you claim that you are not ignorant of science your posts shout much louder that you are.
Opinion
Don't be silly, of course I have. You believe bedtime stories that are refuted by the simple fact that ice floats. And we don't even know that there is one god. You don't seem to realize that there are many different Christian versions of God. Please try to keep up.
Ice floating, refutes nothing, it does admit that the flood did happen.
There are many different versions of Christianity and god, yes....you notice not capitalized....just because someone says they are Christian doesn't' mean they are. If they believe in a god, who wouldn't send them to hell for sin...false god.
If they believe in a god, that loves and has no wrath...false god.
if they believe in a god, that didn't create....false god.
if they believe in a god, who didn't come down in the form of man and died for our sins....false god.
And yes, these gods are man made and have been refuted by the True God of the Bible. Jehovah.
Yeah, there are many different, false gods. But there is only one True God. The God that is love, who is also just, who is also wrathful, who is also a judge, who is also angry, who is also sinless and so much more. Most especially a God who came to down to earth in the form of a man, called a hypostatic union. He was fully God and fully Man, and He showed that.
That same God's son Christ, came so that we may be saved. Even you, so that you can have your sins cleansed by the blood He shed, because He paid our price for salvation by His Death.
Nope. This is an equivocation error on your part. You are using different definitions of faith and pretending that they are all the same. When I speak of faith I am talking of believing without evidence. That is something that you do that I don't.
What evidence do you have that you will wake up tomorrow?...you don't have any...yet you expect to get up...that's called faith.
You see, your under the delusion that you know everything. Not so. If you did, you wouldn't be here talking to me, because you would already know what I was going to say before I said it.
I say that because you say you have no faith. For you to have no faith, would mean that you know what's going to happen before it happens. that you already have the evidence before you that it will happen. Not possible.
I see that you still do not understand simple English. That was a logical conclusion of what you stated. I can quote what you stated and explain how it is a logical conclusion. Stop the dishonest Gishing and I will do so.
Never claimed to be the best at grammar. suck at it really. but the logic of the flood and ice floating...solid.
Wrong. You are projecting again.
Of course it does. You either did not read or did not understand. You don't even know what a population bottleneck is. Again, if you want to go over this in detail start a separate post on this subject. When you keep Gishing I can only give you very light correction. Please don't claim that you understand what a population bottleneck is when you clearly don't.
population bottleneck is a sharp reduction in the size of a
population due to environmental events (such as earthquakes, floods, fires, disease, or droughts) or human activities (such as genocide).
Other words, there was a population bottleneck after the flood, because the population of the earth was destroyed during the flood, only leaving Noah and his family left to populate the earth. Exactly as I explained earlier.
Wrong, there is no history of them. There is fantasy about them. You need to learn the difference between history and fairy tales.
There is written history. Plenty of it. and it being a fairy tale is your really bad opinion.
It would have been a huge problem. If you read about population bottlenecks you would have understood this. Thank you for confirming my earlier conclusion.
Again, your conclusion was incorrect as this statement is also. PB is understood quite easily.
Good. Then please quit strawmanning the theory of evolution. You share a common ancestor with other apes. That is why you are still an ape.
Everyone, including creation scientists agree that species change over time. The fundamental difference is that evolutionists believe that all the diversity of life we see today arose from a single common ancestor and creation scientists believe that all the diversity of life arose from the originally created kinds. This variation includes speciation, but only within the created kinds. Science bears this out as one kind of creature has never been observed to change into another kind despite literally billions of generations that have been scrutinized
Wrong again. Apes are not of the human species. Yes, they are mammals, so are dolphins, why didn't we evolve from them, so are whales and cows anything that has a vertebrae and produces milk for it's young fall under the categorie of mammals. but just because they do, doesn't mean we evolved from them. What it does show though is a Common Creator, God.
So therefore we couldn't have come from them. Why? interbreeding wouldn't have been able to happen. Also, there is no transitional fossils to show the change from ape to man.
You want an honest question. here ya go....Where did the first mammal come from?
Gladly, you know the rules. Start a separate post where you deal only with this topic. No Gishing allowed.
Again wrong. The lack of a near extinction population bottleneck shows this. There were never only two human beings. Populations evolve, not individuals.
individuals change over time. As do populations. They also adapt. They just don't change kind, from one species to another. that we agree.
No Adam and Eve, what evidence do you have that shows otherwise? Opinion on your part.
.
And yet you cannot name one. There are false charges against your neighbor. Guess what Commandment that violates?
That man is good enough.....we're not
You know that this is not true. I see that you are still afraid to debate properly and honestly even though I have offered to give you the evidence that you ask for if you do so.
Then quit saying things have been refuted without showing the evidence that it has.
You are of course wrong about the "God" part but the fact that there are 40,000 different sects show that among Christians there are 40,000 different versions of God.
Wrong and answered earlier.
And yet you have no evidence to support that claim.
Yep...called God's Word.
Again, it depends upon what version of God one believes in. I see that you could not honestly answer the question on flat Earth believers. Has there version of God been refuted?
straw man
I'm not talking about the god the flat earth believers believe in. I'm talking of the one from the Bible God Jehovah
Nope, God does not answer prayers. The few times that this has been tested the claim has been shown to be false. To claim that he answers prayers puts the burden of proof upon you. All you have are anecdotes at best. Worse yet your personal prejudice will give God credit when he does not earn it and you absolve him when he could be blamed for wrongs. You have a very distorted view of the world.
God does answer prayers....sometime is answer is ....NO
Opinion on your part.
And there a much more who believe than who don't. That really doesn't make any difference really. God's still there, you'll see one day.