No, you are simply over sensitive. We are all ignorant in certain topics. You are clearly ignorant in science. But fear not! Education can cure ignorance.
And ape of course. If you go back far enough your ancestors were not humans. And you seemed to have a problem with this when you implied that vertebrates and mammals were the same group. Just as your grandfather's descendants are larger than your fathers descendants, vertebrates is a bigger group than mammals. The purpose of the line of descent was to show that there was no "change in kind".
Wrong, you are simply misunderstanding evolution as Darwin conceived. Once again there is no change of kinid in evolution. The offspring of vertebrates will always be vertebrates. Some of our terms right now are incorrect. Clades are monophyletic. Terms that are not monophyletic will result in confusion among non-scientists.
Wait, were you trying to define "kind" there? You did not do so. You gave some weak examples. I like my definition better. It works.
Sorry, you do not understand the concept of evidence. Since this is a scientific discussion it only makes sense to use scientific evidence. If you don't have a testable (which means falsifiable) hypothesis you don't have evidence. What reasonable test would falsify your acceptance of creationism?
[qoute]]
Well, your correct...evolution isn't good enough...and that isn't good enough for many us to change from believing that God create things to this half way thing of good enough.
When you are going to be this dishonest how do you expect people not to insult you? And remember, life is "good enough". It is clearly not "good".
You just contradicted yourself and you are also demonstrably wrong.
Don't say foolish things that are not true. No one is paying that bit of idiocy the least bit of attention. The book is simply based on a false premise. No real biologist has any concern about those claims.
No, it was refuted long ago. Please, you are just making yourself look worse. And more ignorant by the way.
It depends upon which version of "God" that you believe in. If you believe that your God flooded the Earth that God has been refuted. I will get to the rest of your errors later.[/QUOTE]
Your correct, we are all ignorant in many subjects. Science isn't one of them for me. Spanish is, French is, not science
And yours is about God, your extremely ignorant about Him.
I just don't put my faith in science as you do.
Again, I never said that mammals weren't vertebrae's man you really have a hard time reading.
But you have yet to show me hard evidence of ape to man...where is the Hard evidence.
Buy the way, my family went from tall to short to back to tall again.
I know what clades is...a group of biological taxa (as species) that includes all descendants of one common ancestor. I agree, we have one common Ancestor Adam and Eve and one common Creator, God.And that within a the same species you can interbreed, but there are some that cannot. It's believe the reason for this, and they're not quite certain of it, is there is some type of blocking in the genome of the species.
I know that you can't go from one kind to another kind. Nothing new there.
As for the line of decent, I call it the line of deceit, is that there are no...absolutely no transitional fossils to prove it.
Your correct again, Humans are monophyletic, we come from one couple. Adam and Eve.
About life being good enough, tell that to those who are starving, tell that to those who lose everything, No life isn't good enough, and the main reason,is because We aren't good enough. There is only one good and that's God.
Your really good at saying someone is wrong without backing it up....back it up if i'm demonstrably wrong.
There isn't many versions of God,there are false gods,then there is God,Jehovah of the Bible and He hasn't been refuted.
Prove it.
