@Archivist I was unable to access the specific links you shared. I was able to find some information however most of it was not helpful. Here's what I've gotten thus far:
http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1062&context=yjlf This article deals mainly with domestic violence and how it leads to battered women staying in relationships as servants to the abuser. Hence involuntary servitude. It doesn't even mention abortion except to reference another article. While it does speak of rape (79 references to rape) it does so in the context of violence towards women. It specifically mentions marital rape as an act of involuntary servitude. I'm not seeing the relevance of pregnancy to the issue of involuntary servitude. I do see how in the context of battered women, those situation can fall under the definition of involuntary servitude. Involuntary servitude is likened to slavery. It's a huge stretch to suggest that pregnancy is a form of slavery.
My bad. Sorry. Copied the wrong citation. Drawback with HeinOnline is that the full citations do not appear with the scanned PDFs, so you have to go back to the article list. Apparently I was not paying any attention because the title of thsi article wasn't even close. Try this one: Andrew Koppelman, "Forced Labor: A Thirteenth Amendment Defense of Abortion," 84 Northwestern Univ. Law Review 480-535. As I said before, this might not be available on the internet, but it will be available at any good academic law library or on Hein Online.
In my opinion, the idea that abortion should be allowed in cases of rape because a woman shouldn't be forced into involuntary servitude is just a huge stretch. Saying that pregnancy is like slavery amounts to a cheap rhetorical trick. A lawyer's slight of hand.
A "huge stretch," perhaps, for someone who will never be a victim of rape.
Pregnancy from rape accounts for less than 1% of all abortions.
According to the National Library of Medicine among adult women an estimated 32,101 pregnancies result from rape each year. That is a significant number, particularly if you are one of those 32,101 women.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8765248
If abortion were granted in the cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother, would you then agree to outlaw all other cases for abortion?
No, I would not.
If not, why then is the rape card necessary?
First, in my reply way back on page four of this thread I was replying to a post that said that abvortion should not be allowed even in cases of rape. Second, rape poses a special circumstance that does not exist in other abortion cases, that of involuntary servitude.
If I could get a bill signed that would ban all abortions except for rape, incest, and life of the mother, I'd sign it. 98% of all abortion would be eliminated immediately. Would you support such a bill?
No.
I doubt that rape is really the issue here. It's just a decoy. If you are one of those who wants women to have the right to kill the unborn at any time for any reason, then what difference does it make if it was via rape or consensual sex? Bringing rape into the discussion is just an appeal to emotion.
Becasue, as I already said, rape poses a special circumstance that does not exist in other cases. Maybe you don't have an objection to trampling on people's 13th Amendment rights, but I do.
So for the sake of discussion, we'll grant your argument the rape exception. Now we're left with the other 98% give or take. Let's outlaw those then. Victims of rape and incest can have abortions. That's it. For everyone else it's a crime. Rape problem solved and millions of babies lives saved. All in one post.
So you would make it illegal for women whose life was threatened by the pregnancy to have an abortion? Let's just make the pregnancy a death sentence for them.