Ok I did some more reading, and found some good arguments for small Israel as you mention. However, as I found out, some scholars insist the Hebrew grammar of the passage requires elep to mean a literal “thousand.”Read the paper.
It addresses this.
God Bless.
So, you don't actually see that you're singling out @sjastro to make the case that his beliefs are unique to him(?).. when its perfectly clear to me, that everyone's beliefs are unique to any individual .. Ie: they are their beliefs .. and not something 'owned' by others, or something else.
Men lie, God does not. If God says something, then we know it to be true.Err .. what????
Some beliefs are much more common than others, etc, and I just figure with a person like @sjastro, they gotta be unique, and I wouldn't mind learning about them, or hearing them, etc.So, you don't actually see that you're singling out @sjastro to make the case that his beliefs are unique to him(?).. when its perfectly clear to me, that everyone's beliefs are unique to any individual .. Ie: they are their beliefs .. and not something 'owned' by others, or something else.
And I'm not at all meaning to be bragging or anything like that, but I've been a student of other people's beliefs for a very long time now, and know all kinds of other people's different takes in the matter of beliefs, etc.Some beliefs are much more common than others, etc, and I just figure with a person like @sjastro, they gotta be unique, and I wouldn't mind learning about them, or hearing them, etc.
But doing that in private for now, is probably for the best right now, etc, as I know others might go right to immediately attacking him for them, etc, and I'm not going to do that in private, etc.
God Bless.
And I'm not at all meaning to be bragging or anything like that, but I've been a student of other people's beliefs for a very long time now, and know all kinds of other people's different takes in the matter of beliefs, etc.
It can be without meaning to be sometimes, lol.I wouldn't brag about such a thing. It sounds rather nosy.
Its up to him .. his choice.I'm not recommending that he just come out with them publicly on here right now, there's way, way too many ravenous wolves for that, etc, and if he ever does ever choose to speak with me in private about it, I'm most certainly going to be sure that none of you ever get to ever know about it, unless @sjastro think it's ok, or decides otherwise, etc.
Sounds like a pretty unique guy.Its up to him .. his choice.
But be warned tho .. this is a man who stood between his cat and a six foot monster red kangaroo .. and also took on a deadly eastern brown snake .. bare handed!
And why is that? Because I believe in God? Or because I say that people lie, which they do.Depressingly cynical.
I feel much pity for you.
No, it's clear you are just being passive-aggressive and it is really offensive. Your ostensible assumption is, that if he doesn't agree with your beliefs about the literal historicity of the Exodus account that his faith must somehow be marginal or eccentric for a Christian. But you've been around here enough to know that assumption is false.And I'm not at all meaning to be bragging or anything like that, but I've been a student of other people's beliefs for a very long time now, and know all kinds of other people's different takes in the matter of beliefs, etc.
@sjastro's have to be at least somewhat different, to say the least, etc.
I'm not recommending that he just come out with them publicly on here right now, there's way, way too many ravenous wolves for that, etc, and if he ever does ever choose to speak with me in private about it, I'm most certainly going to be sure that none of you ever get to ever know about it, unless @sjastro think it's ok, or decides otherwise, etc.
God Bless.
And I'm not at all meaning to be bragging or anything like that, but I've been a student of other people's beliefs for a very long time now, and know all kinds of other people's different takes in the matter of beliefs, etc.
@sjastro's have to be at least somewhat different, to say the least, etc.
I'm not recommending that he just come out with them publicly on here right now, there's way, way too many ravenous wolves for that, etc, and if he ever does ever choose to speak with me in private about it, I'm most certainly going to be sure that none of you ever get to ever know about it, unless @sjastro think it's ok, or decides otherwise, etc.
God Bless.
Faith in Christ is just that: faith in Christ. It can't be replaced by faith in a shallow and theologically inadequate interpretation of an ancient religious text.So if there is no archaeological evidence for the ressurection of Jesus Christ, you not gona believe it? Is God's word not enough for you? It's called faith for a reason.
Faith in Christ is just that: faith in Christ. It can't be replaced by faith in a shallow and theologically inadequate interpretation of an ancient religious text.
Like the one subscribed to by most of Christendom.
As you point out, there are a number of them, all of which support Christian Doctrine satisfactorily despite their differences. I was educated in Catholic schools, though I am not myself a Catholic, so I tend to favor theirs, but I find no really important differences from the views of other Traditional Christians.There's a wide stream of theological interpretations out there. You haven't found one that seems reasonable?