• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Creationists: Explain your understanding of microevolution and macroevolution

Status
Not open for further replies.

Astrid

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2021
11,052
3,695
40
Hong Kong
✟188,686.00
Country
Hong Kong
Gender
Female
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
In Relationship
I'm missing your point there.

If God revealed himself to you
did that somehow include telling you
that ToE is wrong? If not, why mention it
in response to the fact that every relevant
fact on earth shows your chosen interpretation
cannot be correct?

If he told you that you are right, well,
that means God affirmed you are right,
incapable of being wrong.

Simple.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
That argument is literally centuries old, and answered for centuries. Google it for an answer.
Yes, the answer is the arrogance of Evangelical Protestants. The question is, how did Christianity survive all those centuries without you?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: pitabread
Upvote 0

driewerf

a day at the Zoo
Mar 7, 2010
3,434
1,961
✟267,108.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,699
52,520
Guam
✟5,132,137.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I admire your very christian attitude to dance on the graves of many dead people.
Oh, please ...

Save it for some scholar who brings up Numbers 31.
 
Upvote 0

FredVB

Regular Member
Mar 11, 2010
4,991
1,011
America
Visit site
✟323,385.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
This is for creationists explaining their respective understanding. If you're a creationist, what do you think microevolution and macroevolution are exactly?

I think that there are gene pools, distinct from one another. Maybe genetic defects happen that contribute to some further variation but not enough that would permit such drift that would exclude all the original gene pool without all the genetic defects that would be involved killing off the gene pool for that possibility, which then could not happen. So it would allow speciation, from adequate variation possible already in the gene pool, and may be a little further variation, but not much further than that.
 
Upvote 0

Astrid

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2021
11,052
3,695
40
Hong Kong
✟188,686.00
Country
Hong Kong
Gender
Female
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
In Relationship
I think that there are gene pools, distinct from one another. Maybe genetic defects happen that contribute to some further variation but not enough that would permit such drift that would exclude all the original gene pool without all the genetic defects that would be involved killing off the gene pool for that possibility, which then could not happen. So it would allow speciation, from adequate variation possible already in the gene pool, and may be a little further variation, but not much further than that.
Huh
 
Upvote 0

Mr Laurier

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2021
1,141
366
59
Georgian Bay/Bruce Peninsula
✟46,584.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
You mean like the [not enough lifeboats] Titanic?
which was not [because they were long since left behind] a science decision. It was accountants all the way. Accountants decided that lifeboats were an expense. NOT ONE SCIENTIST WAS CONSULTED.

[hydrogen-filled] Hindenburg?
Again, not scientists. Engineers trying to appease politicians. National pride. Engineers agreeing with scientist, that it was too risky. But giving in to political pressure.

[ignore the warnings] Challenger?
The captain of HMS Challenger did not ignore any warnings. And the Challenger voyage successfully mapped the sea floor. The scientist on board were able to identify over a hundred new species of fish crab and worm, previously unknown.
What warnings did they ignore?

[waive the safety checks] Deepwater Horizon?
That was investors and CEOs. Again, NOT SCIENTISTS.

[let's get this into production] Florida Footbridge?
Huh? There are thousands of footbridges in Florida. None were built by scientists.
Scientists do not produce footbridges

[it's safe to go back home] L'Aquila?
Huh?
I'm not even able to translate this.

So why are you trying to blame scientists for events that had ziltch to do with them?
 
Upvote 0

Mr Laurier

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2021
1,141
366
59
Georgian Bay/Bruce Peninsula
✟46,584.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
If it had been helium filled there would have been no fire, so probably none. As it stands, 36 people died when your Christian politicians came to the rescue.
Actually, in the 1930s, a large portion of American politicians were openly secular.
 
Upvote 0

Mr Laurier

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2021
1,141
366
59
Georgian Bay/Bruce Peninsula
✟46,584.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics didn't put hydrogen in vessel that was made for helium.
It did though.
The Nazis were so desperate to get their commercial zeppelins flying, they were willing to take a chance on using Hydrogen.
The engineers did try to add more safety measures. But this was not enough.
 
Upvote 0

Mr Laurier

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2021
1,141
366
59
Georgian Bay/Bruce Peninsula
✟46,584.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
So if the U.S. would have sold it to them ... against U.S. policy ... and they would have used it to break Article 198 of the Treaty of Versailles, then what?

Then zeppelin airships would be seen as a safe and effective way to travel. We might still be using them today.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,699
52,520
Guam
✟5,132,137.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The Nazis were so desperate to get their commercial zeppelins flying, they were willing to take a chance on using Hydrogen.
What changed their minds?
 
Upvote 0

Astrid

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2021
11,052
3,695
40
Hong Kong
✟188,686.00
Country
Hong Kong
Gender
Female
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
In Relationship
It did though.
The Nazis were so desperate to get their commercial zeppelins flying, they were willing to take a chance on using Hydrogen.
The engineers did try to add more safety measures. But this was not enough.
I guess it was kind of a freak accident but obviously
they knew it was risky.
People drive every day aware of the risk.
Those who are now maimed for life, if you
now said they could do it all over again, they
would never get in another car.

Worst I got was concussion and broken leg so
I'm still not clear on the risk. :D :(
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.