Actually, it is wholly relevant, and beneficial to my conversation with OP. This is how it became relevant:
In
post #143, you said "God would only be a tyrant if He sent innocent people to hell." - and that is a statement that we all agree is true. So it is important to identify why the people who go to hell are not innocent - meaning, that they are responsible for their sins.
Because a baby (ie: "Joe") has not yet committed any sin, he cannot be responsible for his sin.
There is a type of doctrine out there, which OP presently ascribes to follow, that says babies are born under the curse of Adam and Eve's original sin such that their fallen nature is "imputed" to them, so that there is no way they can be saved (go to heaven) unless they are born again.
OP has even gone so far with that doctrine, to say that babies are born as "children of wrath" and that by extension, they bear resemblance to the image of Satan - Satan being their "spiritual father".
It is a vital point to be clear about, and it can be useful for us to have established that at the earliest opportunity.