Sigh.
Very well. Quotes from my posts where I said I would accept your evidence with the actual specific words where I said I would accept your evidence highlighted in red.
I repeated myself as well, since you apparently didn't understand what I was saying:
You once again didn't seem to understand me, so I repeated myself again:
You then outright refused to take this as a proper answer, and I responded:
You once again accused me of not answering.
I believe I have made it abundantly clear that if you can present legitimate evidence that evolution is wrong, I will accept that evidence and change my views to agree with you that evolution is wrong. I honestly do not know how to make it any clearer.
You asked me if I would abandon evolution if you could show me it was wrong, and I have stated multiple times that I would abandon it if you did so.
I answered your question three times and then I told you three times that I had answered your question, one time even quoting myself where I had answered your question. You've even had another poster on here saying that I and other people had said they will accept your evidence if you can provide it.
so your answer to my question is "yes". ok. here is your counter evidence again:
Tetrapod trackways from the early Middle Devonian period of Poland
now, with this new fossil the fossil order is look like this (image from wiki):
see the bottom left creature? its predate many of its transitional fossils. so instead of 12345 we actually find something like 51234.
so evolution is false now according to your criteria.
Upvote
0