Mickey Mouse Mexican laws don't apply to off duty American servicemen, it says so right in the Bill of Rights.
Yes, that is the only train of thought which might lead one to say Tahmooressi did not commit a crime.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Mickey Mouse Mexican laws don't apply to off duty American servicemen, it says so right in the Bill of Rights.
That's determined by the circumstances
Time will tell![]()
The trial is where it is determined whether or not he broke the laws![]()
What he did appears to have been a mistake not entirely of his own making. On the other hand, what Bergdahl did seems to have been entirely of his own makingWhat he did was illegal, plain and simple.
Do you deny that his actions were illegal?
What he did appears to have been a mistake not entirely of his own making. <snip>
Because I don't know that it was illegal.
Now that you've been educated on the subject, will you call what Tahmooressi did illegal?Don’t bring firearms or ammunition across the border into Mexico.
Don’t carry a knife, even a small pocketknife, on your person in Mexico.
You may become one of dozens of U.S. Citizens who are arrested each month for unintentionally violating Mexico’s strict weapons laws.
If you are caught with firearms or ammunition in Mexico...
- You will go to jail and your vehicle will be seized;
- You will be separated from your family, friends, and your job, and likely suffer substantial financial hardship;
- You will pay court costs and other fees ranging into the tens of thousands of dollars defending yourself;
- You may get up to a 30-year sentence in a Mexican prison if found guilty.
He ended up in Mexico because the signage misled him. He attempted to return to the US rather than enter Mexico and he notified authorities of his intent and the weapons. So no, I cannot say what he did was illegal. But when will you address the Bergdahl situation?Guns are Illegal in Mexico | U.S. Consulate General Tijuana, Mexico
Now that you've been educated on the subject, will you call what Tahmooressi did illegal?
He ended up in Mexico because the signage misled him. He attempted to return to the US rather than enter Mexico and he notified authorities of his intent and the weapons. So no, I cannot say what he did was illegal.
Sorry, but you're making that up. I've never said nor suggested any such thing.The double standards you produce are stunning.
You have no problem calling any Mexican who crosses the border into America as being illegal.
I guess it's safe to say never (speaking of double standards)But when will you address the Bergdahl situation?
Sorry, but you're making that up. I've never said nor suggested any such thing.
If you're driving illegally, you're an illegal driver. If you're in this country illegally, you're an illegal alien. In the case at hand, the illegal alien is dangerous and should be deported to Peru ASAP
Nice strwman. the suggestion was to use the military to enforce the border, not to root out illegal aliens already here.![]()
Those posts don't support your false assertion. Please do not tell lies about me.Not only have you said it, you've probably said it dozens of times. I have posted two of the times you've accused border crossers of being illegal simply for crossing the border.
The double standard is now documented for all to see.
Those posts don't support your false assertion. Please do not tell lies about me.
Except you got it backwards. Bergdahl was very likely committing a crime whereas Tahmooressi was not
Now you're moving the goalposts. Here is you original assertion:You call people who cross the border without legal immigration credentials as being illegal, even though they have never had their day in court, yet here you tell us that you cannot claim illegal against the captive SGT until he has had his day in court.
A blatant double standard if there ever was one.
The double standards you produce are stunning.
You have no problem calling any Mexican who crosses the border into America as being illegal.
If a Mexican drove to a border crossing and told the guards he took a wrong turn and did not want to enter the US, I would fully support allowing him to make a U-turn and return to Mexico. So no double standard exists. Sorry to burst that bubbleYou claimed that Tahmooressi was very likely not committing a crime, yet Mexican authorities claim he did.
Here is your quote:
This is what I am discussing with you, because you are the one who made the claim. I am under no obligation to change this discussion to something else simply because you continue to ask me to discuss something else.
Why do you call people who cross the border into America as ILLEGAL before they've had their day in court? There is your double standard.
If a Mexican drove to a border crossing and told the guards he took a wrong turn and did not want to enter the US, I would fully support allowing him to make a U-turn and return to Mexico. So no double standard exists. Sorry to burst that bubble![]()
If a Mexican drove to a border crossing