Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
For the first time since AT&T was dismantled into Baby Bells four decades ago, the US government is weighing the breakup of one of the world’s largest and most consequential monopolies: Google.
The US Department of Justice in a court filing Tuesday night said it may recommend dismantling Google’s core businesses, separating Google’s search business from Android, Chrome and the Google Play app store.
“That would prevent Google from using products such as Chrome, Play, and Android to advantage Google search and Google search-related products and features — including emerging search access points and features, such as artificial intelligence — over rivals or new entrants,” the government said in its court filing.
I think there are pros and cons to this.
The Pros are pretty obvious, Google leverages other things you do in Chrome, The Play Store, and Android devices to tailor and drive search results, as well as "make our stuff the default" contracts with other big names, for profit-motives in ways that could make it more difficult for other competitors to get a foot in the door. That obviously does present some legal questions.
The Cons (as Google laid out in their response) do have some validity. If Google is forced break apart and open up certain features and functionality to competitors (that allow for the type of seamless integration that consumers have become accustomed to), that does create some data security concerns. Data Transfer can be like a bucket with a small hole in the bottom, the more times you pick it up to move it, the more chances you have for things to leak out the bottom. And for whatever it's worth, I don't know that I'd trust the security mechanisms of a "new market entrant" to be on-par with that of Google in-terms of preventing hacks and breaches.
For example: One the things they want to do is break apart the Play Store from the rest of Google so that "new market entrants" can have more opportunities to compete in that space. If some (albeit well-intentioned) 10-man dev shop decided they were going to make their own easily accessible app store (that has all kinds of elevated access to your device by necessity), are you going to trust them to have the same data protection and malicious software screening process that Google has?
From my own perspective, I would say that given the circumstances, perhaps break up the "default to using our stuff" quasi-exclusivity contracts they have with other companies, but allow Google to retain Android, Chrome, and the Play Store under their umbrella and ecosystem.
His compromised approach did not earn any favor from Ananus the high priest. In 62 CE, he was brought to face the Sanhedrin. They delivered him to be stoned to death. He died as a martyr.18 But someone will say, “You have faith and I have works.” Show me your faith apart from your works, and I will show you my faith by my works.
www.oursundayvisitor.com
www.oursundayvisitor.com
Yep, Dems showing their true colors...Ellis-Marseglia and another Democrats on the panel should resign.Everyone knows how they harvested election ballots in the 1960 election to get JFK into office, and we know what happened when he didnt return the favor. So Biden better watch his back as many of the harvested election ballots of 2020 didnt reappear in the 2024 election, but it doesnt mean they didnt try. Through the vote was closely watched so much less 'harvesting' and millions of votes were missing in this election, but still they were ignoring election laws and trying to bring votes through other methods.
They got caught at least in this case and had to 'cease and desist' as they say and admit their acts...
"Democratic election official in Pennsylvania offered an impassioned apology Wednesday for claiming “precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country” to justify counting about 600 faulty ballots in defiance of state Supreme Court rulings.
“I made a mistake, and because I am an elected official, I am held to a far higher standard than everybody else. So, to the citizens I serve, I apologize, and I will continue to work hard for you and endeavor to not make such a mistake again.”...
Throughout her apology, the packed room – which included many supporters of President-elect Donald Trump – heckled Ellis-Marseglia, and some held up signs that said “tyrant.” Others called for her resignation and prosecution and accused her of trying to count illegal votes to help Democrats hold onto a US Senate seat.
Ellis-Marseglia and another Democrat on the three-member panel voted to count misdated mail ballots and unsigned provisional ballots, over the objections of the lone GOP commissioner, the county’s attorney, and in defiance of the state’s top court, which ruled before the election that ballots with these deficiencies are invalid.
This is unfolding amid a closely watched recount in the state’s US Senate race between Democratic Sen. Bob Casey and Republican Dave McCormick, who leads by about 17,000 votes. CNN has not made a projection in that race.
“I think we all know that precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country, and people violate laws any time they want,” Ellis-Marseglia said at a meeting last week. “So, for me, if I violate this law, it’s because I want a court to pay attention to it. There’s nothing more important than counting votes."....