How should have Christians historically addressed Islam?
- By Hoping2
- Christian Philosophy & Ethics
- 209 Replies
(staff edit)
I forgive you for such postings.
I forgive you for such postings.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And we will be responsible for our previous choices. God’s war is against adversity.God will judge fairly on the last day.
Sure. But you seemed to object to issues such as redistricting, name calling, and underrepresentation, so I was trying to discuss them and see what your specific objections were.You can, you can do a whole lot of things. Doesn’t mean I or anyone else will follow.
So, no interest in discussion, then? Okay, fine.Dont care. It’s my opinion. You offered your opinion, I offered mine. We’re all good.
What "gotcha"? I asked a question, you chose not to answer. Well, not directly, anyway. What conclusions I might draw from that are my own.True, have you run into many people who do don’t fall for the ‘gotcha’ style off topic questions or am I an anomaly?
We can start with these...Exhortations for avoiding being raped? Chapter and verse for that please.
Too late.Or better yet, since your replies are simply beyond the pale, skip it and go your own way. It's just too crazy to continue this 'conversation'. Just too weird.
You can, you can do a whole lot of things. Doesn’t mean I or anyone else will follow.Redistricting, aka gerrymandering, is the topic. The other things were brought up as tangential to that issue.
Dont care. It’s my opinion. You offered your opinion, I offered mine. We’re all good.I understand that. But you offered your opinion on the matter, so I'm asking about that. It's a discussion board, I'm discussing.
True, have you run into many people who do don’t fall for the ‘gotcha’ style off topic questions or am I an anomaly?-- A2SG, but I suppose I could that that response as an answer, of sorts, to my question....
I understand. I tend to discount anyone who makes blank assertions, particularly when presented as an insinuation. I don't entertain slander, but it's still polite to ask for some proof.There are, what, a half-dozen threads on this distraction? I'm confident this "evidence" from Grassley et al. is at least in some PDF links, but probably explicitly copied into a post and it was as underwhelming as we expect. (Or maybe they have something new & compelling, but I shall not hold my breath.)
I’m not sure how often my church has coffee and donuts but I don’t think it’s even once a month. I go Mass on Saturday. I miss the fellowship we had at the LCMS.I agree.
You mean like this statement?One of the advantages of paranoia is the ability to read minds.
You are completely ignoring the point. But perhaps that is my fault. I can understand how using an analogy so extreme such a men fighting with women can be so unsettling that it completely overshadows the point that is trying to be made. So please allow me to use another, less dramatic example. In a New York subway, a blue haird, man hating feminist steps into the train and finds all the seats are full. She is 47 and carrying several bags of groceries. Yet, not a single man stands up and offers her their seat. Now this particular woman is a very vocal activist for women's equality. Held picket signs to protest the patriarchy and cried to her girlfriends about how oppressed she was as she was sipping her PSL (pumpkin spice latte) at Starbucks. She even traveled all the way to Washington D.C. to protest the SCOTUS repeal of Roe v. Wade.You should include men against men when not condoning violence. Don’t condone violence period. Most women aren’t looking for a fight anyway. Being physically weaker than men, they have other ways to solve disputes. One could argue that a lack of women, historically, in government leadership has allowed men to start the very wars that made the draft necessary.
And back on topic, women have the right to vote despite what some men wish different. It’s not a right that will go away as long as our Constitution is preserved.
Redistricting, aka gerrymandering, is the topic. The other things were brought up as tangential to that issue.What does that have to do with the topic of the thread.
I understand that. But you offered your opinion on the matter, so I'm asking about that. It's a discussion board, I'm discussing.I assure you I am not mentioned in the OP, nor do I work for the government.
He left the campaign, didn't contact any Russian until later. He also was not charged with colluding with Russia to influence the election.He was charged with lying about his collusion with Russian agents.
Supposedly, Stone left the Trump campaign in 2015, but Trump pardoned him, for reasons that seem obvious.
That 3rd is still opposed to pedophilia. I bet the 3rd has a number if reasons not to be upset over the lack of release.Apparently , not all of them. Only about 2/3 of Americans are unhappy that Trump isn't coming clean about what's in those files.
You actually can't think of any reason besides the fact you think hes on it? None at all?Sounds good to me. It's puzzling why Trump won't do it.
Yup. Does that prove they were pedophiles?Bill Clinton, like Trump, was on the flight list to Epstein's island. So there is that.
Maybe.Yep. Might explain why Maxwell, after speaking with Trump's ex-lawyer, got moved to a better lock-up.
He is afraid of being raped, in spite of all God's exhortations for avoiding that !How do you know he doesn't?
What does that have to do with the topic of the thread.Do you feel redistricting, name calling, or underrepresentation are wrong? Have you objected when the GOP does stuff like that, or only when the Democrats do?
-- A2SG, just wondering....it's entirely possible I missed a post or two of yours along the way....
Hmmm. I've never heard of matter being good or evil. When God spoke of His Creation saying it was good, I tend to think He was expressing His satisfaction or being adequate towards serving His purpose. When contemplating Spirit I see good and bad in terms of Light/dark, darkness being in degrees of separation from God, Who Is Light.You are correct that Christ loves all and offers the gift of salvation to who so ever will, come and drink of the waters of life freely; however, we should not fall into the gnostic trap of thinking that Christ’s Church is invisible.
You correctly say, semantics is important and how we use words matters. What I also need to point out is how we think determines our actions.
If w me think that the Church is invisible, then we begin to entertain gnostic thoughts. The extreme form of which is “Matter is evil, only spirit is good”
This is what lead to Satan’s fall. He is pure spirit and took great pride in himself. He could not bring himself to serve man who is made in God’s image, yet is material which Satan believes is beneath him, and he certainly would not bow to God who humbled Himself and was born of a woman.
God created the earth and all matter and declared it very good. Matter itself is not evil, rather the lust of the flesh in rebellion against God’s commandments. So when you hear some one that claims that matter is evil, you can be pretty sure he is influenced by Satan or one of his demons
Christ promised that he would build His Church on “this rock” whether you say the rock is Peter or his testimony the Church is visible and built by Christ. The only Church that maintains a direct line to Jesus are the Apostolic Churches. The others came into existence by the will of man
It is an act of humility not pride that I follow the Catholic Church
As scripture says in 1 John
2 By this is the spirit of God known. Every spirit which confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh, is of God: 3 And every spirit that dissolveth Jesus, is not of God: and this is Antichrist, of whom you have heard that he cometh, and he is now already in the world. 4 You are of God, little children, and have overcome him. Because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world. 5 They are of the world: therefore of the world they speak, and the world heareth them.