-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Trump Threatens Federal Takeover of Washington After Member of DOGE Is Assaulted
- News & Current Events (Articles Required)
- 653 Replies
Like he did the WH?
Hmm.. actually, that's too tasteful to be Trump's doing.... ah, it's Liberache's house.
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
TRUMP "MISSED THE DEADLINE" TO CALL OFF TX GERRYMANDERING; CALIFORNIA WILL NOW DRAW NEW, MORE “BEAUTIFUL MAPS”
- American Politics
- 101 Replies
Poll shows how Californians feel about Newsom’s redistricting fight with Trump
The UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies poll, conducted for the Los Angeles Times, asked registered voters about the Newsom-backed redistricting push favoring California Democrats, which serves as a counterattack to President Trump and Texas Republicans reworking election maps to their advantage.When voters were asked whether they agree with California’s redistricting maneuver, 46% said it was a good idea, while 36% said it was a bad idea. Slightly more, 48%, said they would vote in favor of the temporary gerrymandering efforts if it appeared on the statewide special election ballot in November. Nearly a third said they would vote no, while 20% said they were undecided.
Among voters who regularly cast ballots in statewide elections, overall support for redistricting jumped to 55%, compared with 34% opposed.
[I assume the image shows how the question was framed, with the context regarding Texas and that the change is temporary.]
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
The significance of Paul
- By Josheb
- Christian History
- 15 Replies
Good morning @CerebralCherub,
I added the numbering so I could track the points of comment and inquiry.
[1] Nearly everything contained in the gospels can be found in what we call the Old Testament, or what the Jews call Tanakh. Very little there is new. If we were Jews living in the first century Israel, we'd have all already been familiar with Jesus' source material, but we would have considered what he was teaching to be new because what Jesus taught can be considered a restored understanding of Tanakh, the original meaning and intent of God's prior revelation. By the time the first century AD rolled around Judaism had departed from God in many ways, both theologically and practically. Judaism got the priesthood wrong, the monarchy wrong, the temple wrong, and it was rife with the poles of legalism and hypocrisy. All of that needed correction. Judaism needed an overhaul, not a "restoration." This was all foreknown by God and the fact the Jewish leaders (nor the commoner) understood that was simply roof of the fact. The time had come for the overhaul. The overhaul had been predicted (prophesied) but Judaism was so twisted and perverted that it had become blind - even when the prophesied Messiah stood right in front of them commanding the elements of creation, healing sickness, raising people from the grave, casting out demons speaking into the heart of a person, etc. Paul simply built on that. There'd be no Paul without it. Keep in mind we have a very small portion of what Jesus taught. He preached nearly daily for three years and, according to John, what he said would fill many books, not a dozen epistles.
[2a] Paul is very much like Moses. Moses was cast adrift by his mother in her hope for his survival. God saw fit to have the infant rescued by an Egyptian princess and nursed by a Jewish nursemaid..... who just happened to be the boy's mom. As a consequence, Moses learned both Egyptian and Jewish culture. He learned about monotheism and polytheism. He learned the arts of politics and warfare, which were realms of knowledge he would not have learned solely as a slave. By the time Moses is summoned into service Moses has also experienced longsuffering and poverty, the freedom of royalty, the destitution of his own guilt, the thirst of wandering in a wilderness, and the freedom of a shepherd. He is uniquely prepared for the task assigned him.
Paul is very similar. Born Saul, he was raised in the Greek city of Tarsus by a father who had Roman citizenship and a mother who was Jewish. Saul, therefore, enjoyed the privilege of citizenship and became familiar with both monotheism and polytheism, the Greco-Roman Gentile culture and the Jewish culture, which in his lifetime had largely succumbed to the intertestamental influences of Hellenism. He gets sent off to Jerusalem to have the finest education of his day under the greatest Jewish teacher of his day, Gamaliel. Saul does not simply learn Judaism because he is taught the sectarian viewpoints of the Pharisees, not the longer, more historical and orthodox views of the Sadducees. The Pharisees, along with the Essenes (and the Zealots), developed during the intertestamental period, too. This is important because the Pharisees believed in life after death, a resurrection, whereas the Sads did not (which is why they are so sad u cee
). Like Moses was centuries earlier, this makes Saul uniquely prepared to serve God's purpose preaching the gospel to the diverse pagan cultures all the way to Caesar's courts (an event that would have been nearly impossible for a non-citizen of the Roman Empire). Fundamentally, the only power and authority Paul has is that which is given to him by his Creator and that was forcefully demonstrated by knocking him of his donkey, striking him blind, and forcing him to submit to someone he would have persecuted and seen executed only moments earlier. [2b] Paul's epistles are nothing more than the furtherance of divine revelation, a revelation to all humanity that began centuries earlier with the Pentateuch and the oral traditions that God had inspired to inform the written word. If all we had was the book of Genesis we'd understand very little, and the same can be said if all we had was the Pentateuch. The older revelation(s) informs the newer revelation, and the newer revelation explains the older. We should/would, therefore expect the epistolary to have much more explanatory power than anything and everything that preceded it, but without which there could be no epistolary. NONE of it would have been possible for Paul had he not been a Pharisees and not been purchased by God for God's purpose.
Ephesians 2:8-10
For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; 9not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. 10For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them.
Paul had been created in Christ for works that God planned for him to perform before Paul was ever saved. That's the only authority Paul has, and he'd been prepared from his youth for those good works, for that very purpose. He was not simply a literate man in a day when most people were illiterate. He was a man literate in Greek and Roman culture, a man familiar with the Greek philosophers and the philosophies they asserted, with the rituals and customs of the pagan gods. He was uniquely prepared to speak to circumstances in adjacent societies/cultures the more insulated Jews could not.
Lastly, the documents we have that comprise our Bible are likely to be a small portion of all the correspondence that was written by the apostles (of which there were more than two dozen). We know, for example, that there are letters to the Church in Corinth that are missing because the Corinthians letters mention correspondence we don't have. God, in His wisdom, saw fit to preserve what (apparently) we needed and was sufficient for His purposes.
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
