A-Z of short words (5 letters and under) (4)
- By Jimmy P
- Word Games
- 1686 Replies
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Unless your niece comes to Christ, believes the Gospel, accept the Lord as her Saviour and repents of sin, she will go to hell....like every sinner. We all need ChristI just learned that my niece has "married" another woman. Her sister is also lesbian & "married" to another woman. I've searched the Bible for information on this subject & only found scripture about practicing gay men not going to Heaven. Not sure about women. Any info on this subject is welcome. I can't speak to their mom/my sister on the subject because she hates me for voting for Trump but their salvation matters to me. None of them go to a Christian church.
I think you are misunderstanding my post. I was just writing about the peer-review process in general, and it had nothing to do with evolution other than that peer-review is not a guarantee that dissenting views have been considered.First of all, AV1611Vet's post was not a relevant response because I wasn't arguing that the peer-review process couldn't be or ever was compromised. I asked you to describe the reasonably obtainable evidence you would expect to find if your claim about the peer-review process for relevant journal articles about the Theory of Evolution is false. Is your claim falsifiable or unfalsifiable?
Of course it is not guaranteed. Sometimes scientists with dissenting views have to work hard for them to be considered, and endure periods of ridicule and exclusion. But if the idea has merit, the evidence will eventually lead the scientific community to it.I’m not saying that papers are necessarily false or fabricated. I’m sure that most of the writers who get published generally do their best. However, I am saying that peer-review is not a guarantee that dissenting views have been considered. This is in addition to the posting by AV1611Vet.
First of all, AV1611Vet's post was not a relevant response because I wasn't arguing that the peer-review process couldn't be or ever was compromised. I asked you to describe the reasonably obtainable evidence you would expect to find if your claim about the peer-review process for relevant journal articles about the Theory of Evolution is false. Is your claim falsifiable or unfalsifiable?I’m not saying that papers are necessarily false or fabricated. I’m sure that most of the writers who get published generally do their best. However, I am saying that peer-review is not a guarantee that dissenting views have been considered. This is in addition to the posting by AV1611Vet.
I think you are on to something here. I have for a long time thought that people generally do not want to face their own sinfulness. And I wonder about certain theological structures that apparently have been constructed for the specific purpose of insulating man from it.Not saying that "these things" as in 'given these things' is truth, or not truth;
the distinction referred to is not something often , nor usually even, seen.
Sticking with Scripture , the realization of what is true in this world of sinful mankind
is not frequent at all, nor is it popular nor sought except by a few.
Civil case no criminal charges were filed. He said she said . All about money nothing else. Trial in NY a gotch Trump state. Trump was sued for defamation over stating "she's not my type" really??? Just a money grab attempt. Defamation case under appeal. Civil case can be appealed to the Supreme Court but is unlikely they would take it. Is this nonsense all you've got? f you worked this hard to expose corruption on your side of the isle we would be getting somewhere. Oh never mind Bondi is on it. Stay tuned.The court only found him guilty of lying when he said he didn't sexually assault the female in question. Then, after losing the trial, he slandered her yet again. So she sued him again, and won an even bigger judgement. He's not very bright, you know.
The problem with paid sick leave is too many exploit the system. Employees even go around boasting about how they used paid sick leave to attend a concert or whatever.
I’m not saying that papers are necessarily false or fabricated. I’m sure that most of the writers who get published generally do their best. However, I am saying that peer-review is not a guarantee that dissenting views have been considered. This is in addition to the posting by AV1611Vet.My previous response to your post above was probably not sufficiently clear. So, please consider this response instead:
For reputable peer-reviewed journal articles about various aspects of evolution by natural selection, what evidence would you expect to find if your claim about their unreliability is false? In other words, what evidence would demonstrate to your satisfaction that the claim you are making is false or at least insufficiently supported? Please provide citations for the specific and relevant journal articles you have in mind.
Your response above doesn't answer my question. I'm not asking for the evidence you have to support your claim. I'm trying to understand if your claim is falsifiable or not. What, if any, evidence would falsify the claim you are making to your satisfaction?I was looking for a good example that would illustrate the problem. One would be the migration of humans into the Americas. It has taken decades for paleontologists to move the date from 10,000 years ago to 25,000 years ago, even though the evidence was there that the 10,000 year date was probably wrong. The old guard has to retire or die for new ideas to emerge.
It was a legal opinion based on the evidence presented in the charge, and good advice. Felonious assault generally requires intent to kill or inflict serious bodily injury, which they clearly cannot prove.Yeah he put on quite a show. Now he can do his little routine from behind bars.
Now hes a star in his own play. Good for him. No sympathy from me.
Well, the judge should have kept his mouth shut. He doesn't get to make that claim yet as there has been no trial. If he wants the release that guy until the next hearing, fine. But no commentary.
One more time, What bills were passed under Biden or Obama had that same misconceived focus? Be specific.The ones Trump is being lauded for overturning or ending.
I was looking for a good example that would illustrate the problem. One would be the migration of humans into the Americas. It has taken decades for paleontologists to move the date from 10,000 years ago to 25,000 years ago, even though the evidence was there that the 10,000 year date was probably wrong. The old guard has to retire or die for new ideas to emerge.What reasonably obtainable evidence would you expect to find if your claim about the unreliability of the peer-review process is false?
Polling says otherwise. Even come immigration.![]()
Branco Cartoon - Pro-Crime Candidate - Comically Incorrect
A.F. Branco Cartoon - Minneapolis Mayor socialist candidate Oma Fateh pledges to protect illegal immigrants and criminals if elected.comicallyincorrect.com
As you seem to be aware, Trump's people have used it without Trump's knowledge.
Nice pivot and diversion from the auto pen issue. I treat your source as bull hockey from a trump hater. Not reliable , but it does serve your purpose well.Which isn't as bad as what happened to him in his first attempt to be a president:
Trump’s aides stole his papers ‘to protect the country’
President Donald Trump’s closest aides have taken extraordinary measures in the White House to try to stop what they saw as his most dangerous impulses, going so far as to swipe and hide papers from his desk so he wouldn’t sign them,
My previous response to your post above was probably not sufficiently clear. So, please consider this response instead:What you wrote is true, but my point was that peer-review is not sufficient evidence that a particular paper should be taken as fact or even sufficiently vetted. “Publish or perish” is a very strong incentive to write what supervisors and colleagues agree with to keep or advance one’s career.
I know it's hard for many, and I know that it is impossible... I use the word impossible, not because each individual cannot observe it, but because the heart refuses to let the individual observe it... it is impossible for many to see what is clearly written - the truth, which states that only few find the narrow door that opens to the narrow path leading to life. While the masses flood through the broad road leading to destruction, because they have itching ears, for what the many false prophets who have turned away from the truth, tells them.I sense in Pauls writings especially that he was constantly worried about individuals and groups rising up to undermine the teachings he is often is reminding them of.
Like it was the same battle of the individual between the flesh and the spirit. Like the church itself is fighting the battle as a community and has to always be ready to defend itself from the wolves.
Even moreso today as I think in Pauls time they were clear because they did not allow the outside world to come into the church. But today for a growing number of churches its hard to tell the difference.
Thats why I think more than ever we need to be cautious. The problem is the idea of truth itself, that there is one unified truth is seen as controlling. So its a cultural wide shift into postmodernist thinking that has encroached on the church. That it is wrong to declare and stand on a single truth and this is oppressing others.
Which then makes those churches the bad guys and others the good guys. Thats why the church should have nothing to do with the same political games that are happening in mainstream society. Just stick to what they are to do best which is being Christlike. Helping the poor and being good examples in behaviour.
Other than covering up having an affair with a porn star (both adults) and “words” you have no evidence. The “documented” sexual assault did not result in charges or a conviction so is a non stater since it would not be admissible in court.Those convictions, Trump's observed creeping into girl's dressing rooms, his documented history of sexual assault are all facts. That's what evidence is.
You can’t convict on suspicion.Suspicion is based on evidence. Trump, as you know, could end all of it, by just coming clean and making those files public. But since he did a 180 and now claims that they don't exist, that's a problem.
Nothing bad ever happened to me. I have no traumas.What you're describing here could easily be a double-edged sword. I'm not declaring definitively that it is, only suggesting that it could be. The reason I say that is because those reactions--guilt, grief, etc.--in relation to specific situations could be the result of some sort of trauma. They are, in my case. I was abused, so a lot of my reactions to things are skewed.
I have these sensations on all bad things. Whether they are situations, people, places. I never know the truth what is happening, but I know something is there, if if people lie about it.You can be disinclined to sin, to hang out with people you can see will drag you down, etc. without feeling any particular guilt or grief. Perhaps you have those feelings for perfectly healthy reasons, but if you have any trauma in your past, it may be worth considering that your emotional responses might need some adjustment.