Having indulged my need for venting my spleen, its time for me to take a slightly more objective look at the problem.
1. First, datawise, there is no data, at least nothing useable or subject to interpretation.
- medicaid, who qualifies and under what conditions, per state, - actual textual laws...
2. Second, there are too many other problems that complicate and distract us from the issue at hand.
- The working poor without health insurance,
- Those that are below the poverty line.
- Those middle-class workers that no longer have coverage.
- Those medicare recipients that have to choose between pills and food.
3. Third, the issue of whether illegals pay taxes, obviously, those that don't even get minimum wage,...is moot. For those that actually can afford false documentation, they get the real jobs, spend a lifetime looking over their shoulder, and yes, by definition, pay taxes.
4. As far as what the impact is on local government, we need reliable figures...
5. As far as how illegals impact on medicaid, we need reliable figures.
6. Its been mentioned elsewhere that the subject of illegal immigration tends to make its presence when there are problems with the economy, a situation where everyone gets squeezed and scapegoats are in demand. Otherwise, the illegals make for good crop prices.
7. The definition of illegal,...starting with the exclusion of orientals in the 19th century, the exclusion of the "mongrel hordes" after the spanish-american war, the persecution of radicals during and after WWI, the titles begin with politicians, the civilians add the title criminal for flavor.
8. The focus on the hispanic as an illegal, as unwelcome, as a criminal, as an undesireable, speaks volumes, the few hispanics that are bible-believing protestants are not welcome in anglo churches, neighborhoods or workplaces. Neither are they welcome in black circles, the competition between minorities, nothing new there...
For some reason I haven't heard plans to build a wall along the northern border, the marauding white cannuck hordes must be on a hiatus.
9. So much for our secular objectivity, the bible we believe in has a lot to say;
Abraham was a foreigner
Moses was a foreigner.
You are not to oppress the foreigner
Rahab was a foreigner
Ruth was a foreigner.
While Israel was under judgement, Elijah intervened on behalf of the woman in Sareptha.
Namaan was healed.
The challenge is for us to reconcile ourselves with the few facts available, the scriptures that define us and an understanding based to actual exposure to hunger, poverty, debt, lack of health insurance, descrimination,
hipocrisy and finally a God that takes a dim view of our excuses.
For those that are proud members of this great country, you have a lot to be proud of, as much as many countries envy or hate us, they can't help but follow our lead in social legislation geared toward an evermore just society. It's not the world market we are a part of, its not the over-stretched military commitments we make, the world stage we are a part of, our white stetson hat and white horse are part of an image of righteouseness applied on a global scale, a process 2,000 years in the making.
Debates are a question of controlling the process before the process corrupts us all. If you don't impose objectivity, you'll never persuade anyone toward a common consensus.