No, the connections to the lab have been proven to be false. All of the data conclusively shows this came from a natural source, not a man made one. If you feel the need to hate China & the Chinese, use one of Trump's excuses. This one is DOA.
This isn't about human denials, it's about the molecular, biochemical and genetic signature of the virus.
At least we have an answer to your other thread about where the hatred comes from.
From the article:
“There’s no proof the coronavirus accidentally escaped from a laboratory, but we can’t take the Chinese government’s denials at face value.”
What a vacuous statement...
There’s no proof that Donald Trump molests teenage girls every weekend, but we can’t take his denials at face value.
See?
Do you have a reliable source for this proof ?I am open to whatever factual evidence you can provide. I am genuinely curious to know what the facts are and am not predisposed to any conclusion. .
Do you have a reliable source for this proof ?I am open to whatever factual evidence you can provide. I am genuinely curious to know what the facts are and am not predisposed to any conclusion. .
The virus definitely came from a Wuhan research facility that was studying the bat Corona virus.
The virus definitely came from a Wuhan research facility that was studying the bat Corona virus.
Your video comes is the same YouTube blogger used as the source for the OP's National Review article. True or not, it doesn't provide additional evidence.
OB
I think the most probable scenario is that it leaked from the lab, but its origin is not in the lab, they were just studying it and making some experiments on it.
If somebody wanted this to be a real weapon, they would do some other modifications or used more deadly viruses as basis.
I think the most probable scenario is that it leaked from the lab, but its origin is not in the lab, they were just studying it and making some experiments on it.
And use it on their own people first, harm their economy, then quickly close the lab, lie about the real numbers of dead in their country etc?Unless they wanted it to be as deadly as it is ie: not 100 percent lethal but very infectious and kills a smaller percentage.
I am not an expert, I only build on what some experts said about it.What experiments were they making on it, do you think?
And use it on their own people first, harm their economy, then quickly close the lab, lie about the real numbers of dead in their country etc?
It really looks rather like a stupid accident.
I am not an expert, I only build on what some experts said about it.