BrightCandle said:
The Jewish month was based on the cycles of the moon, while the weekly cycle is based on the 7 day cycle that originated in Genesis, with the Sabbath taking place on the 7th day. When God says Sabbath He means Sabbath! Don't try to complicate something that is simple. Remember, truth is simple, while error is complex.
Is this a way of saying "I'm not listening"? The explanation was simple enough: it wasn't only Jews who measured months by the moon, or counted seven days to a week. Certainly, Isaiah is using a Jewish
timeframe - from Sabbath to Sabbath - and it makes perfect sense because the world was ordered by Israel's God and the new world would centre on Him. It's no coincidence that the Septuagint often used "
sabbaton" in reference to a whole week. The Sabbath is the perfect point of reference, and that is what it was meant to be. It structured and regulated all of time around God, and as such is an ideal metaphor for eternity with God.
But the fact that, despite our assurance that the Sabbath is still the Sabbath, sabbatarians still think that we're trying to "keep nine commandments and forget one" means that they haven't been paying attention. It's fine if you've already made up your mind that we've lost the plot, but that doesn't mean you understand what we believe. Likewise, when God says "Sabbath", does that mean everybody
automatically knows what He means by "Sabbath"?
Since you seem to have some respect for S. Bacchiocchi, I'll start with a quote from him:
The "regulations" advocated by the Colossian "philosophy" had to do not only with "food and drink" but also with sacred times referred to as "a festival or a new moon or a sabbath" (Col 2:16). Commentators agree that these three words represent a logical and progressive sequence (annual, monthly, and weekly), as well as an exhaustive enumeration of sacred times. This interpretation is validated by the occurrence of these terms in similar or reverse sequence five times in the Septuagint and several other times in other literature.
Some view the "sabbaths
sabbaton" as a reference to annual ceremonial Sabbaths rather than the weekly Sabbath (Lev 23:6-8, 21, 24- 25, 27-28, 37-38) [he refers to
The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary vol. 7, pp. 205-206]. Such a view, however, breaks the logical and progressive sequence and ignores the fact that in the Septuagint the annual ceremonial Sabbaths are never designated simply as "sabbath" (
sabbaton), but always with the compound expression "Sabbath of Sabbaths" (
sabbata sabbaton). Indications such as these compellingly show that the word "
sabbaton" used in Colossians 2:16 cannot refer to any of the annual ceremonial Sabbaths.
--
Chapter 6, The Sabbath under Crossfire
I've read the rest, but since I'm not "attacking the Sabbath", I will simply try to focus on Paul's concerns in Colossians. If he, as a liberated Pharisee and a Christian, could find fault with some Christians' religious understanding of the Jewish Sabbath (whether because of overly pagan influence or Jewish superstition), it means "keeping" the Sabbath isn't as simple as hallowing (in our books or minds) a day of vague ceremonial nostalgia or abstaining from certain actions (like someone who abstains from certain food). A way that seems right might still end in death, and this seems especially likely with the "law of sin and death" (Rom. 8:2), where "the very commandment that was intended to bring life actually brought death" (Rom. 7:10). There must be a concrete reality behind it, and if we follow Paul's arguments (and Jesus' actions), it's
not what day of the week a feast or celebration is that
makes it sacred, or this "sacredness" that determines what may or may not be done, but what it signifies about your relationship with God, and what God means to you.
Relationships are never simple, and for the Sabbath law to be simple you have to reduce it to
simply an issue of "which day is right" or to a list of actions that are forbidden,
as if that's all God means by it. Because once you have thus reduced it, it becomes easy to say, "I'm keeping it and you're not". Does that sound familiar? "I haven't killed anyone, so I haven't transgressed the commandment" - but are you angry with your brother? "I haven't cheated on anyone, so I haven't committed adultery" - but have you committed it in your heart? "I rest on the Sabbath" -- but do you enter God's creation-rest? The important question Jesus asks is this: What does your keeping of the commandments say about your relationship with God and your neighbour? This question neatly summarizes the goal of all the commandments (Matt. 22:37-39).
If all it is to you is just a matter of right or wrong, regardless of the relationships involved - the divisions it causes or the faith it calls into question - while you
try to keep the commandments and do everything "right" by your own calculations, you have already failed (Matt. 5:20).
On the other hand, like Paul shows in Romans 6:1, it's easy to misinterpret this and say "but why keep any commandments at all?", which is what some of you seem to think the only logical conclusion is for Sunday-keepers. But it seems you fail to realize that the
very reason we don't keep the Sabbath like the Jews did - yes, even Jews like Paul and Jesus - is because we take Romans 6:2-5 to heart!
Not, as some would explain it, because we wallow in the early church fathers' anti-Semiticism. We
don't see the Sabbath as having been moved or cancelled or forgotten, but as another commandment that has been fulfilled by Christ, and therefore only properly
found in Christ. And fulfilled doesn't mean
cancelled, it means passed, obeyed, completed... It is still as in effect as it ever was to condemn our natural bodies, but our spirit has been released from it; not to return to immorality - for that can only exists under a law - but into the custody of Christ and under direction of the Spirit.
The only way that sin cannot be our master is if we free from any condemnation the law could bring against us - "because the law is the power of sin" - and transferred to grace. Because everybody is sinful and condemned to death by the law, this transference implies death and
resurrection, of which Christ is the firstborn and the mediator. And when our ownership has been transferred from the law that brings death to the grace of Christ, we "have been set free from sin and have become slaves to righteousness" (Rom. 6:18) - we know that"no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin" (Rom. 3:20), but even while we struggle to overcome sin, we can know "there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit of life set me free from the law of sin and death" (Rom. 8:1-2).
The fourth commandment, like all the other laws, shows that we were
not keeping the sabbath - nor could we if we tried. It's our death sentence. Now, apply this principle to the Sabbath, as Paul applies it to adultery:
Romans 7:1-3
Do you not know, brothersfor I am speaking to men who know the lawthat the law has authority over a man only as long as he lives? For example, by law a married woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive, but if her husband dies, she is released from the law of marriage. So then, if she marries another man while her husband is still alive, she is called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is released from that law and is not an adulteress, even though she marries another man.
And having been "married" to Christ and sharing in His resurrection, while we are faithful to
Him - according to grace, not according to the old law - nobody can call us "adulterers" if we don't hold on to the Sabbath, which prefigured our rest and exposed our sin, but to the rest itself and our relief from sin (Matt. 11:28). No, we don't remember the Sabbath of Israel's exodus ceremonially, but we
do remember the Sabbath on which God's rest meant
our salvation, on which He became
our God, and we found Sunday to be a good day to remember it
on - Today (Heb. 4:7) - because on the day God rested, we were still busy sinning.
"But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code" (Rom. 7:6).