Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then you're living in quite a different reality from many of the rest of us because I don't see anyone here under your OP umbrella that supports any oppressive religious or ideological doctrine. If you still feel that I'm wrong however, evidence would be a good start.Reality.
Reality.
There are plenty who agree with me, though you are right we have a different sense of reality from you lot. JThen you're living in quite a different reality from many of the rest of us because I don't see anyone here under your OP umbrella that supports any oppressive religious or ideological doctrine. If you still feel that I'm wrong however, evidence would be a good start.
I am not making it up, what is your motive for suggesting I am, fear?Why are you making stuff up?
How many people are still critical of Israel over that flotilla incident even though footage showing the activists starting the violence has gone viral?
Reality.
Cute! So...setting up a blockade for over 3 years, blocking people from delivering aid, dropping armed people onto your ship. Your response would have been, what?
tulc(just curious)![]()
Like the Qur'an, the bible has its fair share of violence, particularly violence condoned and/or carried out by God himself. And if we accept the idea that Jesus is God, then would it not follow that Jesus also condoned and/or carried out said violence? It's an honest question. I'm not denying the violence in the Qur'an, nor am I suggesting that the prophet Muhammad didn't carry out any violent campaigns, I'm simply curious as to how one can charge Muhammad with being violent when one's own god is depicted as condoning and/or carrying out such violence.According to Islamic history itself, Mohammed and his followers carried out military style campaigns, Jesus and His disciples didnt.
According to Islamic history itself, Mohammed and his followers carried out military style campaigns, Jesus and His disciples didn’t.
Old Arab proverb: The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
So obviously not, if God carries out the violence then leave it to God, Jesus tells His disciples not to use the sword or violence and didn’t.Like the Qur'an, the bible has its fair share of violence, particularly violence condoned and/or carried out by God himself. And if we accept the idea that Jesus is God, then would it not follow that Jesus also condoned and/or carried out said violence?
Mohammed isnt Allah, Jesus Christ is God. Do you not understand core Christian values?I'm simply curious as to how one can charge Muhammad with being violent when one's own god is depicted as condoning and/or carrying out such violence.
Apart from having no idea what your point is, just to correct you during the disputes some of Mohammed’s followers were attacked.According to history itself, Jesus and his disciples were captured, tortured, and put to death in increasingly horrific ways, Mohammed and his followers weren't.
Just sayin' -- if you got something that works, go with it.
Ahhh! Welcome to why the US supported those oppressive regimes all over the world in the name of "fighting the commies!".![]()
tulc(you know, the ones that killed all those nuns and priests who spoke up for the poor?)![]()
I am showing who are the followers of the religion and who aren’t by whether they follow who they have faith in or not.No just the people with a cross on their chest.
No Christian abides by OT law, they abide by Christ’s fulfilment, that’s what makes them Christians.Most Christians do not abide to the OT laws. Thus Christianity does not punish its followers for apostasy.
Again the question is were the actions of the IRA people in line with Christ’s teaching.The IRA were Christians.
No, one wouldn’t be a Muslim if they followed OT law, they would be a Jew. Muslim follow what is taught from Mohammed in the Quran and Haddith.Many Muslims abide to the OT laws and to them the people we call terrorists are nothing more than martyrs for Islam and freedom fighters.
Is that true? I suggest the evidence in the world indicates the opposite.What we need to understand here is that Islam is in the eyes of many as wicked as Christianity is to many Muslims. Most Christians and Muslims however just want to live their lives in peace.
As a disciple of Christ I fully agree with you.Personally I find fundamentalist Islam and all who adhere to the OT laws as uncivilised. This is not meant as an insult to anyone. Anyone who believes that killing is justified if done in the name of God then in my book that is barbarism and conduct unbecoming of a civilised person.
Gishin,
I am not making it up, what is your motive for suggesting I am, fear?
According to Islamic history itself, Mohammed and his followers carried out military style campaigns, Jesus and His disciples didnt.
People are scared of Islam so they tend to want to appease rather than lose things like possessions and confortable lifestyles.