I personally cannot think of anybody who would more impress me than Oprah.......
but she really would need to choose a good running mate to be taken very seriously.
I personally cannot think of anybody who would more impress me than Oprah.......
but she really would need to choose a good running mate to be taken very seriously.
I wonder at times if President Trump's low popularity might make it tough for another non-politician to have a chance at wining the Presidency anytime soon? Then again, his very election victory did break the ice, so I guess such is a plus for those wanting to see another non-politician in the White House. Actually, Oprah might be a good choice for VP for the Dems?
She has an R after her name, though most Republicans around here think she's RINO. And arguably the chief of RINOs. So maybe that makes her a Democrat. But whatever her party, I'd vote for Sen. Susan in a heartbeat. She's one of the very best people in government today.
Ryan and Murphy, both from swing states, must-win states, would be good for VP candidates.
Las Vegas Congresswoman Dina Titus is 67 but she has two big pluses--Latina, opponent of nuclear waste dumping in Nevada, and a strong supporter of unions, voted in by Las Vegas service workers.
I used to like Kristen Gillibrand, but she went off the deep end in her vendetta against Al Franken--as if his actions while pursuing a career in comedy were even remotely comparable to Trump's serial molestations or Moore's pedophilia. There are bad Democrats--Andrew Weiner eeewwww.... Franken wasn't one of them.
Yes, but putting that money into the banks lmakes use of multiple deposit creation. Banks, under the right circumstances can multiply that money exponentially. Under poor conditions bring in twice it's value. You don't get that just handing it out to people. And in a financial crisis money creation is important.
I know... but "under the right circumstances" doesn't always happen in this world. I don't trust banks, the government, Big Pharma, insurance companies, etc. I am not an anarchist, they have just proven themselves to be untrustworthy over time.
I know... but "under the right circumstances" doesn't always happen in this world. I don't trust banks, the government, Big Pharma, insurance companies, etc. I am not an anarchist, they have just proven themselves to be untrustworthy over time.
Yes, but you understand then banks' role in money creation, and why, despite your distrust of banks, experts will say to invest funds into them rather than just hand it out.
And even in non-ideal conditions banks still create money.