Who would you like to see lead the Democratic Party into 2020.

Who would you like to see lead the Democrats into 2020?

  • Mark Zuckerberg

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Oprah Winfrey

    Votes: 3 14.3%
  • Sen. Bernie Sanders

    Votes: 6 28.6%
  • Joe Biden

    Votes: 3 14.3%
  • Elizabeth Warren

    Votes: 2 9.5%
  • Jerry Brown

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Sen. Kamala D. Harris (Calif.)

    Votes: 3 14.3%
  • Sen. Cory Booker (N.J.)

    Votes: 2 9.5%
  • Howard Schultz

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Robert Mendelson

    Votes: 1 4.8%

  • Total voters
    21

DennisTate

Newbie
Site Supporter
Mar 31, 2012
10,742
1,665
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟379,894.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I am actually Canadian so I am relatively unbiased......
Generally I am a Trump supporter but I would love to see certain people enter the DNC leadership convention in order to cause the 2020 election to be win - win - win - win rather than the type of politics that we saw in this last election.


Oprah with Mr. Chris Brown for V. P. would be the ideal team in my opinion.......

MMT proponent Chris Brown for DNC national leader to face President Trump in 2020.


Mr. Chris Brown
does a fantastic job of explaining monetary policy for
a non-economist such as myself.
 

DennisTate

Newbie
Site Supporter
Mar 31, 2012
10,742
1,665
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟379,894.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Now you probably don't know who Mr. Robert Mendelson is but he is the author of a plan for peace in the Middle East that I believe deserves to be looked at very seriously.

God's Peace Plan


God's Peace Plan

for the Holy Land

A Peace Plan for Israel/Palestine

conforming to guidelines from the Bible and Qur’an
presented by
Robert Leon Mendelson


“God’s Peace for the Holy Land*”? Isn’t that a presumptuous title? Please allow

me to explain. First, since the sacred books of Judaism, Christianity and Islam

provide the guidelines supporting this solution, and since I wasn’t the one who

wrote them, calling them “God’s” seems fair. That’s why the words “presented by”

precede my name on the title page. Second, this book in no way proselytizes or

puts one religion above another. Nor does it openly or subtly encourage anyone to

convert to anything. What it does is take into account something without which

attaining peace in the Holy Land (Israel/Palestine) will forever be unattainable.

That “something” is the sacred messages delivered to each of the peoples involved

in the dispute. In this case, referencing the sacred books is more than some dry,

scholarly exercise or even a gesture of courtesy. Without taking the sacred books

into account, peace in the Holy Land will be near, if not completely, impossible.
......
......
Sura 29:46;

Dispute not…with people of the Book;

And say ye, "We believe in what hath been sent down to us [Qur’an]

and what hath been sent down to you. [Old & New Testaments]

Our God and your God is one,..."

Sura 2:136;

Say ye: "We believe in God,

and that which hath been sent down to us [Qur’an],

and that which hath been sent down to Abraham

and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes [Joshua],

and in that was given to Moses, and to Jesus,

and that which was given to the prophets, from their Lord.

No difference do we make between any of them."


There are many other instances in which Muhammad told his people that

the books of the Bible were confirmed. Again, one can argue theology, but

Muslims have a choice as to whether they wish to read the Qur’an for life or

for death. Making use of the Old Testament for a solution meant for the

members of both tribes currently in the Holy Land in no way places Muslims

in other lands under any constraints in their own land. The following passage

is quite specific regarding the value of the Old Testament—properly applied;

Sura 46:12;

But before the Koran was the Book of Moses, a rule and a mercy;

and this Book confirmeth it (the Pentateuch)—in the Arabic tongue—

that those who are guilty of that wrong may be warned,

and as glad tidings to the doers of good."



“glad tidings” to “doers of good”. Muslims are supposed to be “doers of good”.

Using Old Testament Law for the descendents of those it was originally given to

in the same land in which it was originally received doesn’t violate shariah in the

least. Muhammad recited a verse including a reference to David (from the Bible)


Sura 6:85;
And we gave him Isaac and Jacob, and guided both aright;

and We had guided…among the descendants of Abraham, David …”



David said something pertinent to the situation:

Psalm 19:9-11, David;

9…The ordinances of the LORD are sure and altogether righteous.

10 They are more precious than gold, than much pure gold;

they are sweeter than honey, than honey from the comb.

11 By them is your servant warned;

in keeping them there is great reward.”



And last, an Old Testament prophecy of particular interest for Muslims

throughout the Middle East from Isaiah…

Isaiah 19:25;

The LORD Almighty will bless them, saying,

"Blessed be Egypt my people, Assyria [Iraq] my handiwork,

and Israel my inheritance."



There is value for all people to make use of this wonderful tool for peace.

Without it, well, the next two passages sum up what Muslims will do.

The first passage explains how the situation in the Holy Land is seen by

Muslims worldwide and how it effects their relations with America.
 
Upvote 0

hislegacy

Memories pre 2021
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
43,936
14,021
Broken Arrow, OK
✟703,728.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
alfred_e_neuman.jpg


I’d vote for Alfred E Newman. He doesn’t worry about anything.
 
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
80
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,295.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
alfred_e_neuman.jpg


I’d vote for Alfred E Newman. He doesn’t worry about anything.

Neither does President Trump apparently. It is not a desirable trait.
 
Upvote 0

Ken Rank

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 12, 2014
7,218
5,563
Winchester, KENtucky
✟308,985.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I am actually Canadian so I am relatively unbiased......
Generally I am a Trump supporter but I would love to see certain people enter the DNC leadership convention in order to cause the 2020 election to be win - win - win - win rather than the type of politics that we saw in this last election.


Oprah with Mr. Chris Brown for V. P. would be the ideal team in my opinion.......

MMT proponent Chris Brown for DNC national leader to face President Trump in 2020.


Mr. Chris Brown
does a fantastic job of explaining monetary policy for
a non-economist such as myself.
What qualifications does an actress/talk show host have that makes you think she can run a country? I think we're already pushing it with a one-term Senator followed by a business man.
 
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,024
7,364
60
Indianapolis, IN
✟549,630.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I feel for Joe Bidden losing his son, but had he ran Trump would have lost. He is getting older and I don't know how he will hold up over the next three years. Given the choices of the poll, assuming there can be only one. May it be Joe Bidden, he was my first choice back in 2015.
 
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
80
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,295.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
What qualifications does an actress/talk show host have that makes you think she can run a country? I think we're already pushing it with a one-term Senator followed by a business man.

What qualifications did a second rate actor who co-starred with a chimp have to be president?
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
23,853
25,793
LA
✟556,212.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
What qualifications does an actress/talk show host have that makes you think she can run a country? I think we're already pushing it with a one-term Senator followed by a business man.
One could probably argue the case that Oprah Winfrey is actually more successful than Donald Trump was when he decided to run for president. He's already proven the job requires no previous experience in government and she's not half as deranged as he's come off.

I think Oprah could handedly beat Trump in an election.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

hislegacy

Memories pre 2021
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
43,936
14,021
Broken Arrow, OK
✟703,728.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
One could probably argue the case that Oprah Winfrey is actually more successful than Donald Trump was when he decided to run for president. He's already proven the job requires no previous experience in government and she's not half as deranged as he's come off.

I think Oprah could handedly beat Trump in an election.


If elected, perhaps she would give everyone who voted for her a car?
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,276
6,964
72
St. Louis, MO.
✟374,452.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
She has an R after her name, though most Republicans around here think she's RINO. And arguably the chief of RINOs. So maybe that makes her a Democrat. But whatever her party, I'd vote for Sen. Susan in a heartbeat. She's one of the very best people in government today.

Susan_Collins_official_Senate_photo.jpg
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,066
4,740
✟839,713.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I'd prefer Bloomberg to anyone there. However, I am more than fine with Biden.
=====================
The problem for me is that I've been here before. It is the time to allow the left to run for the presidency, and they will likely lose. We are a centrist country.

The left wouldn't support Hubert Humphrey against Nixon. We had Nixon for 8 years. The left has given us McGovern, Mondale, and Dukakis. They will likely give us Warren or Sanders. Independents will then support whoever the Republicans run.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,407
15,496
✟1,110,801.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'd prefer Bloomberg to anyone there. However, I am more than fine with Biden.
=====================
The problem for me is that I've been here before. It is the time to allow the left to run for the presidency, and they will likely lose. We are a centrist country.

The left wouldn't support Hubert Humphrey against Nixon. We had Nixon for 8 years. The left has given us McGovern, Mondale, and Dukakis. They will likely give us Warren or Sanders. Independents will then support whoever the Republicans run.
I'm an Independent and I didn't vote for Trump or Clinton. But I would have voted for Kasich.
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,066
4,740
✟839,713.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I'm an Independent and I didn't vote for Trump or Clinton.

So, you chose to protest with your vote. Millions of independents voted for one or the others. As was the case in 2000, in the end those who didn't chose ending up making the choice. There were plenty enough independents who voted independent or stayed home to have made the difference in
PA, WI, MN and MI.

Of course, that is my personal opinion. Sometimes a 3rd party does indeed became one of the two major parties. The last time this happened was in the 40's in MN.
 
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,407
15,496
✟1,110,801.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So, you chose to protest with your vote. Millions of independents voted for one or the others. As was the case in 2000, in the end those who didn't chose ending up making the choice. There were plenty enough independents who voted independent or stayed home to have made the difference in
PA, WI, MN and MI.

Of course, that is my personal opinion. Sometimes a 3rd party does indeed became one of the two major parties. The last time this happened was in the 40's in MN.
I have to vote my conscience, I just couldn't bring myself to vote for either of them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cow451
Upvote 0

Tom 1

Optimistic sceptic
Site Supporter
Nov 13, 2017
12,212
12,526
Tarnaveni
✟818,769.00
Country
Romania
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What qualifications did a second rate actor who co-starred with a chimp have to be president?

Actually, as someone with a more left wing background, I think Reagan did a pretty good job, if you define the president as someone who looks out for the country’s best interests, and has the focus to make tough decisions.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: mark46
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums