Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I totally agree - these experiences can be life-changing. But it doesn't mean they're experiences of real events.
Psychedelics (especially psylocibin) are under serious consideration by the medical profession again because the experiences they provide can have life-changing effects - often for the better. Some people who suffer from temporal lobe epilepsy have had life-changing experiences during seizures, and these can be artificially induced. Life-changing experiences can even happen during lucid dreams.
The experiences may be profound and life-changing, but that doesn't mean they're experiences of real events, any more than dreams are. There is a branch of philosophy that proposes that if you can imagine it, it's real; but that's a conceptual reality, not the same as physical reality. This is a distinction that some people seem to have trouble with, and there are many unscrupulous profiteers who like to encourage this confusion.
"Pulling and gravitation, which resemble basic feminine traits, are the dominant properties of the magnetic loop. Consequently, magnetic loops have a capacity for storing energy and act to maintain the structural integrity of the entire wave formation. The electronic/energetic loop consists of expanding properties that disperse energetic matter that “disappears” into space. This is synonymous with masculine characteristics." (Dr. Chaim Tejman)
This idea probably reflects the problems in reconciling quantum mechanics with General Relativity - blindly applying the maths that works elsewhere gives absurd results - the kind of thing Feynman invented renormalisation to deal with.Energy from Quantum Vacuum seems to
be of a magnitude far, far, far beyond electricity or
even nuclear energy .....
Explain how - and what exactly is 'Wave Theory'?Wave Theory and String Theory certainly do
elaborate on behaviour patters of fundamental energy that
would certainly tend to lead to sentience...
For example?But there are also an astonishing number of people making money
off Atheistic Darwinian Evolutionary Theory
I seriously doubt it - unless as an example of pseudoscientific woo. The article you linked to is gibberish of Chopra-esque proportions.In the future Dr. Chaim Tejman may be quoted...
For example?
I seriously doubt it - unless as an example of pseudoscientific woo. The article you linked to is gibberish of Chopra-esque proportions.
This idea probably reflects the problems in reconciling quantum mechanics with General Relativity - blindly applying the maths that works elsewhere gives absurd results - the kind of thing Feynman invented renormalisation to deal with.
Explain how - and what exactly is 'Wave Theory'?
I don't think you have a clue what you're talking about.
For example?
I seriously doubt it - unless as an example of pseudoscientific woo. The article you linked to is gibberish of Chopra-esque proportions.
"The real burden in the next three centuries will not be the development of fancy mathematics, but the experimental testing of these ambitious theories. All current thinking about total unification assumes that the effects of linking all the forces and particles together will only become manifest at energies that are some trillion times greater than those currently attainable in particle accelerators. Probably we shall never reach such energies directly" ( A Theory of Everything" Volume 21 of "The World of Science)
Rather a sweeping generalization - who, for example - or do you have some statistical evidence?University professors and even high school teachers do not want to admit that much of what they were taught twenty to forty years ago is now obsolete.
But he's quite wrong, they don't. The smallest particles don't behave like matter at larger scales at all. They don't even behave like particles most of the time...... he puts forward the idea that the tiniest particles behave much like
planets and stars and star clusters .... the smallest particles actually behave
somewhat like the largest groupings of matter in the universe......
I would suggest that fusion is a more realistic prospect.I know enough to know that energy from quantum vacuum could play a huge role in
getting the modern economy off our addiction to oil.......
No, it couldn't; it was fraudulent pseudoscience.... the catalyst could be some variation of the Stanley Meyers hydrogen fuel dune buggy.... that is suspected to ultimately be tapping into Energy from Quantum Vacuum......
Not really, no. The quote you posted wasn't about energy available from the quantum vacuum, but the energy required to reunify the fundamental forces (i.e. recreate the conditions at the big bang).That is not to say that this will happen... just that it has potential.....
But he's quite wrong, they don't. The smallest particles don't behave like matter at larger scales at all. They don't even behave like particles most of the time...
I see no obvious commonalities between the two - why does String Theory remind you of Dr. Ritchie's dream?
I'd prefer if you could summarize in your own words (just so I know what your understanding of it is), and then explain just what you think that article has to do with Dr. Ritchie's dream?This article by an online Theoretical Physicist friend of mine may help you
to understand why I would think this.
Then again, maybe not?!
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hidden-un-realities-graham-p?trk=hb_ntf_MEGAPHONE_ARTICLE_POST
Hidden Un-Realities
- Published on December 21, 2016, Graham P.
Now wait, I was responding to the idea that, "the tiniest particles behave much like planets and stars and star clusters .... the smallest particles actually behave somewhat like the largest groupings of matter in the universe..."So you disagree with the idea of particles generally forming something along the line of schools of fish... or flocks of birds or.....
I'd prefer if you could summarize in your own words (just so I know what your understanding of it is), and then explain just what you think that article has to do with Dr. Ritchie's dream?
The Dr. Chaim Henry Tejman website is impressive. What he writes combined with his diagrams makes a lot of sense.Now wait, I was responding to the idea that, "the tiniest particles behave much like planets and stars and star clusters .... the smallest particles actually behave somewhat like the largest groupings of matter in the universe..."
What has that to do with schools of fish or flocks of birds?
And no, AFAIAA the smallest particles do not show flocking behavior like schools of fish or flocks of birds. Where did that idea come from?
It didn't make any sense to me; 'not even wrong' would characterize it best.The Dr. Chaim Henry Tejman website is impressive. What he writes combined with his diagrams makes a lot of sense.
I am an Evolutionary Theist........
I am of the belief that a being with "Godlike" technological capability
began, far far far far far more than 13.72 billion years ago, in
fundamental or nearly fundamental energy that to at least some
degree corresponds with "Energy from Quantum Vacuum."
This Intelligence learned and learned, and experimented..... .and
designed Big Bang type events, nearly an infinite number of them,
and eventually, around 13.72 billion year or so ago began our.......
Big Bang event that led to the evolution plus creation of
all the life forms that we see here on earth.
If matter had any intelligent properties
then your story would have merit.
But matter tends toward decay so physics is against your story.
Heat Death: The Ultimate Fate of Our Universe
The Secret Life of Plants (1973) is a book by Peter Tompkins and Christopher Bird. The book documents controversial experiments that reveal unusual phenomena regarding plants such as plant sentience, discovered through experimentation. It goes on to discuss philosophies and progressive farming methods based on these findings. The book was heavily criticized by scientists for promoting absurd pseudoscientific claims.
Technology has nothing to do with the issue. God creates through force of will.
All of reality is His creation and obeys His will.
As far as the OP goes, intelligence started with God, who is neither matter nor energy, but spirit.
I am an Evolutionary Theist........
I am of the belief that a being with "Godlike" technological capability
began, far far far far far more than 13.72 billion years ago, in
fundamental or nearly fundamental energy that to at least some
degree corresponds with "Energy from Quantum Vacuum."
This Intelligence learned and learned, and experimented..... .and
designed Big Bang type events, nearly an infinite number of them,
and eventually, around 13.72 billion year or so ago began our.......
Big Bang event that led to the evolution plus creation of
all the life forms that we see here on earth.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?