Reference?The torah is the law that condemns to death. That law was paid in full and nailed to the cross by our Risen Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. law=works= death
Saved by GRACE!!
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Reference?The torah is the law that condemns to death. That law was paid in full and nailed to the cross by our Risen Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. law=works= death
Saved by GRACE!!
It does. It is an agreement, if we believe in Messiah, we will join the covenant and be atoned for. If not, we are out of covenant and are damned to "Hinnom" or hell.I've been at this for a while. To accept what you've posted requires me to redefine words and even substitute your words for the words found in either the English or orignial language versions. You know what the hanging points are unless you only started talking to others about the Bible or religious activity.
A covenant like the NC dosen't fit your definition of covenant. The NC is a one way covenant based entirely on promises without preformance of the second party such as the Sinaitic covenant. There's no if/then preformance relationship.
bugkiller
Galatians chapter 2
19 “For through the law I died to the law so that I might live for God. 20 I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I now live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. 21 I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!”[
And which covenant are you talking about?It does. It is an agreement, if we believe in Messiah, we will join the covenant and be atoned for. If not, we are out of covenant and are damned to "Hinnom" or hell.
Just pray for them... it's their branches bearing it's fruit.If you insist on engaging in personal attacks, well, we can ask a mod to make it so you cant reply to me or anyone else for that matter.
Excuse me? The Torah does indeed leave instructions on what to do for when the Israelites came into the land:There is no such law. The Torah requires sacrifices be made in a tabernacle; it says nothing of Jerusalem and nothing of the Temple. At the time Moses wrote the Torah, Israel was wandering in the desert, and until the reign of King David, Jerusalem was in the hands of the Jebusites.
Excuse me? The Torah does indeed leave instructions on what to do for when the Israelites came into the land:
Deut 12:5-6
5 But you are to seek the place the Lord your God will choose from among all your tribes to put his Name there for his dwelling. To that place you must go; 6 there bring your burnt offerings and sacrifices, your tithes and special gifts, what you have vowed to give and your freewill offerings, and the firstborn of your herds and flocks.
That law says nothing about the Temple, or about Jerusalem; one could argue that the Temple being destroyed simply meant that it was no longer God's chosen place, and that He wished to dwell elsewhere, and the Jews should have setup a tabernacle somewhere else in Judea.
Indeed, the Tabernacle was not immediately in Jerusalem, and the Temple was not built for many centuries after Israel had taken posession of the Promised Land.
Thus, my contention is that the Rabinnical Jews violate the Torah and have violated the Torah by not erecting a temporary Tabernacle as close to Jerusalem as possible. There are no provisions in the Torah itself for not offering sacrifices.
This, of course, does not matter. The Torah is not an immutable divine law; it never applied to non-Jews (rather, they were subject to the Noachide Laws, something more or less ratified by the Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15), and the Torah was frequently radically reinterpreted in sometimes contradictory ways by the Prophets and by Jesus Christ, acting with divine authority.
Compare Christian laws on dietary restrictions or adulterynwith the Torah for example.
I increasingly find myself wondering if "the Law" referred to by our Lord is not the Torah at all, but the Noachide Law; this is speculation on my part at lresent but something I intend to investigate.
The point, which you missed the first time so I'm going to spell it out, is that when the Israelites came into the land, they were to look for THE place to offer sacrifice. THE = a single solitary place, not many places, not changing multiple places, but one fixed place. That place came to be the Temple Mount and no other place. Once the Temple was built in Jerusalem, NO OTHER PLACE WOULD DO ever again.
Deut 12:5-6
5 But you are to seek the place the Lord your God will choose from among all your tribes to put his Name there for his dwelling. To that place you must go; 6 there bring your burnt offerings and sacrifices, your tithes and special gifts, what you have vowed to give and your freewill offerings, and the firstborn of your herds and flocks.
It simply took time for the Israelites to find the one place God intended for the Temple to be. Probably because He had ordained Solomon to build it.
- Why was the tabernacle not immediately and permanently located in Jerusalem, which was held by the Jebusites until King David?
- Why do the Karaites, on the basis of a sola scriptura interpretation of the Tanakh, disagree?
- Why do the Beta Israel disagree?
1 Timothy chapter 1 verse7, 8It simply took time for the Israelites to find the one place God intended for the Temple to be. Probably because He had ordained Solomon to build it.
Karaites, et al, are heretics. It's like asking why Jehovah's Witnesses disagree about the oneness of God, even though they use the same Bible. I don't give folks like Karaites or JW's the time of day.