• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What does the resurrection of Jesus actually prove?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Neostarwcc

We are saved purely by the work and grace of God.
Site Supporter
Dec 13, 2015
5,503
4,575
39
US
✟1,110,567.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married


What I meant by adding to the Bible is stated at the end of Revelation (Revelation 22:18-19). Revelation was meant to be the last book of the Bible. So any religious book that comes after revelation is a false writing and every "prophet" that comes after the last prophet is a false prophet. But by your argument any book that was written after the book of Deuteronomy the Jews shouldn't have added either. Because Moses also said in Deuteronomy (I forget exactly where) that the Torah was supposed to be the complete Bible. but yet the Jews added extra books anyway because more prophets came and they wanted to tell the rest of Jewish history. To 2/3rds of the Jews the Old Testament is the complete bible.

Also about 1/3rd of the Jews alive today not only accept the New Testament as part of scripture but also believe that Jesus is the Messiah. And one day every Jew will accept Jesus as the messiah when Christ returns as it is prophesied. So your argument about the Jews just doesn't hold water to me.

But the prophet Isaiah said that the messiah would be rejected and despised by his own people and by mankind. So it isn't a surprise to me.

Who says Jesus wasn't important to the Romans? Both the Jews and the Romans wanted to expose him as a false prophet. That's why Pilate sent guards to guard Jesus's tomb because he made claims that he would rise from the dead. Also another thing I forgot to add. Mary Magdeline expected Jesus to be still dead when she visited his tomb. And she was surprised to see him alive.

While you're right that the only reason Pilate executed Jesus was to appeal to the Jewish crowd that wanted him dead it also was crucial to fulfil prophecy and to buy our salvation. If Jesus was never crucified than not only could we never be saved but then Christ couldn't have been the Jewish messiah.

I didn't read the rest of what you said because I didn't really have time. I have to get off soon. I might read and reply to it after its quite long.
 
Upvote 0

Theo Barnsley

Active Member
Jan 4, 2019
137
87
30
Auckland
✟28,650.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Engaged

When Revelation was written, the Christian bible did not even exist. The christian bible was not canonized until the 4th century, so when the author of revelation wrote that it could not be added to, he was obviously just talking about the book of revelation. Later on the church ADDED the gospels, the letters of paul, acts etc to the book of Revelation (placed in front of it, but still ADDED to it), to make the Cannon that you refer to as the N.T.

But the prophet Isaiah said that the Messiah would be rejected and despised by his own people and by mankind. So it isn't a surprise to me.
How is Jesus rejected & despised by mankind, when 2 billion people worship him? Maybe Donald Trump is the Messiah, because that prophecy fits him far more than it fits Jesus!

Who says Jesus wasn't important to the Romans? Both the Jews and the Romans wanted to expose him as a false prophet. That's why Pilate sent guards to guard Jesus's tomb because he made claims that he would rise from the dead.
If Jesus was so important to the Romans, Pilate would not have wanted to release him. Pilate obviously was not concerned he was a false prophet.

Why would Romans be concerned he was a false prophet? The Romans had many gods, & there were lots of Jews going around claiming to be the Messiah in those days. Jesus was offending Jewish sensibilities, not Roman sensibilities. To the Romans he would have just been another crazy Jew, & nothing more than a dead criminal once crucified.

We dont know if Pilate DID send guards to guard jesus tomb. We only have one person writing that, & you can tell from other writings in Mathew's gospel, that Mathew obviously makes things up to dramatise things.

Even if guards WERE sent, they weren't sent till the next day, so at least a 12-hour window of opportunity to move the body (it would only take about 30 minutes), & if no body was reported missing, no investigation would have been performed.
Also another thing I forgot to add. Mary Magdeline expected Jesus to be still dead when she visited his tomb. And she was surprised to see him alive.
Assuming that the account is true as written, It is probable that Mary Magdelene was not informed that Jesus body was going to be moved. She is a woman after all, & women weren't well trusted in those days (& many men wouldn't even trust to tell a woman about something like that these days either in case she blabbed her mouth to the wrong person). They also might not have expected her to go to the tomb on Sunday morning.

However the fact that Mary Magdalen found the tomb missing on Sunday morning would appear to prove that Jesus body WAS moved, & NOT resurrected (thank you for making my case for me).

Why? Because Jesus claimed he would be resurrected on the THIRD day! Friday afternoon of the crucifixion to Sunday morning is only 1 1/2 days. IF Jesus was going to be resurrected on the THIRD day, then his body would STILL HAVE BEEN IN THE TOMB on Sunday morning, & not gone missing until late Monday afternoon! So this is a clear case of a moved or stolen body & NOT a resurrection event!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Natsumi Lam

Preparer of the Bride
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2015
1,543
682
✟142,806.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Then show me evidence that what you believe about Jesus is any more valid than the scenario that I have stated? What you believe makes no more logical sense than the scenario that I have proposed as an explanation for the resurection.
Using human logic will not give you the answer you are seeking. It is by faith and the mouth and heart the you either believe or dont believe He is and does what He promised.
 
Upvote 0

Theo Barnsley

Active Member
Jan 4, 2019
137
87
30
Auckland
✟28,650.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Engaged
Using human logic will not give you the answer you are seeking. It is by faith and the mouth and heart the you either believe or dont believe He is and does what He promised.
If i am going to believe by faith I may as well stick all the religions on a dart board, & then believe by faith whatever religion I hit with the dart! If logic wont get me any answers then faith certainly wont!
 
Upvote 0

Theo Barnsley

Active Member
Jan 4, 2019
137
87
30
Auckland
✟28,650.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Engaged
Who is the, The Angel of Lord
I dont know, & either do you. You might like to postulate that you know, but you will have zero evidence, either from scripture or elsewhere to backup any name or entity you might propose. There are many angels mentioned in the O.T.

I notice you have made no attempt to answer the other questions I challenged you on.
 
Upvote 0

psalm911

Active Member
Feb 26, 2019
196
56
47
kingston
✟6,171.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Jesus is declared to be the Son of God with authority, according to the Holy Spirit in Psalm 2:7-12, by the resurrection from the dead: which is the day God said this day have I begotten thee, as it is also spoken of in the scripture below.



Acts 13:33 King James Version (KJV)
33 God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that he hath raised up Jesus again; as it is also written in the second psalm, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee.
 
Upvote 0

Theo Barnsley

Active Member
Jan 4, 2019
137
87
30
Auckland
✟28,650.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Engaged
Except Psalm 2:7-12 dosnt mention anything about the resurection of the dead, or the Holy Spirit & it also isnt talking about Jesus. Psalm 2:7-12 is about the nation of Israel, which is referred to a no. of times in the O.T. as 'Gods Son', as can be seen in the follwoing passage:
“When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son. The more they were called, the more they went away; they kept sacrificing to the Baals and burning offerings to idols” (vv. 1–2).
- Hosea 11:1–7
 
Upvote 0

psalm911

Active Member
Feb 26, 2019
196
56
47
kingston
✟6,171.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Acts 13 33 shows the day being talked about in Psalm 2 7 to 12 is referring to the day Christ was resurrected. Furthermore it is the holy Spirit talking in that scripture in Psalms.
 
Upvote 0

Theo Barnsley

Active Member
Jan 4, 2019
137
87
30
Auckland
✟28,650.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Engaged
Acts 13 33 shows the day being talked about in Psalm 2 7 to 12 is referring to the day Christ was resurrected. Furthermore it is the holy Spirit talking in that scripture in Psalms.
Since the holy spirit is NEVER EVER mentioned in the O.T., where do you get your information from that the holy spirit has anything at all to do with Psalms? Or is that just YOUR interpretation? The new testament authors claimed lots of things, none of which have never been proven to be true, & none of which any evidence can be provided to support the claims. They make lots of claims of O.T. texts being prophesy about Jesus, which is obviously not true when the O.T. texts are READ IN CONTEXT!

I could make claims that certain passages in the O.T. refer to Donald Trump as well. All I have to do is go through the O.T. & find any phrase that appears to fit, such as "he was rejected & despised" & claim Donald Trump is the prophesied Messiah!
 
Upvote 0

Theo Barnsley

Active Member
Jan 4, 2019
137
87
30
Auckland
✟28,650.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Engaged
I'm not here to debate with you and I can see your bitterness toward the truth.

"And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters."
You have not stated any truth!
 
Upvote 0

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
13,761
5,823
60
Mississippi
✟322,399.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single

I have to work and there are other areas here on this website that i also am participating in discussions. So i do not have time to spend every hour, at a computer answering questions during the week.
Plus most of what you were saying was just mans (non believing Jews) opinion.
That is why i ask about the Angel of God, the Bible gives the answer to who The Angel of God is.

The Bible gives the answer, In Judges 13 (and other passages too) the birth of Samson. Samson's parents are visited by the Angel of God. I will not post the whole text here (you can read it for yourself).
The Bible states that this Angel of God is recognized as a man and also as God (A Man of God)

So the woman came and told her husband, saying, “A Man of God came to me, and His countenance was like the countenance of the Angel of God, very awesome; but I did not ask Him where He was from, and He did not tell me His name.

So Manoah arose and followed his wife. When he came to the Man, he said to Him, “Are You the Man who spoke to this woman?”
And He said, “I am.

Now in Judges 13 we see that this man is actually God.

And the Angel of the Lord said to him, “Why do you ask My name, seeing it is wonderful?”

When the Angel of the Lord appeared no more to Manoah and his wife, then Manoah knew that He was the Angel of the Lord.

And Manoah said to his wife, “We shall surely die, because we have seen God!”
But his wife said to him, “If the Lord had desired to kill us, He would not have accepted a burnt offering and a grain offering from our hands, nor would He have shown us all these things, nor would He have told us such things as these at this time.”

The Angel of God is God the Bible states that
 
Upvote 0

Theo Barnsley

Active Member
Jan 4, 2019
137
87
30
Auckland
✟28,650.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Engaged
So what does this actually prove? It actually proves nothing. You are trying to infer that the 'Angel of God' is Jesus, but there is absolutely nothing in the passages suggesting that this might be the case. For you to make this claim smacks of desperation on your part.

I COULD infer that its the REAL messiah (not Jesus) who is yet to actually appear on earth & FULFILL the prophecies that the messiah was SUPPOSED to fulfill, instead of being crucified as a criminal & fulfilling NO prophecies that the messiah was supposed to fulfill. But there is nothing suggesting that my proposition is true any more or LESS than the passage supports your proposition that the angel is Jesus.

In Genesis, god is described as walking in the garden with Adam & Eve, & since we were supposedly created in 'gods image' apparently God can apparently appear as looking like a man if he wants to. If god can poof a universe & everything in it from nothing into existance, I am sure that god can manage to appear from time to time as a man if he wants to. I dont think it is required for god to have a son to act on his behalf!

There is nothing in the O.T. that suggests that god does have a son, quite the contrary, which brings me once again to the 21 passages describing God, that you have made absolutely no attempt to explain where Jesus fits in with the passages:
  1. "there is no one like Yahweh our God." Exodus 8:10
  2. "Yahweh, He is God; there is no other besides Him." Deuteronomy 4:35
  3. "Yahweh, He is God in heaven above and on the earth below; there is no other." Deuteronomy 4:39
  4. "See now that I, I am He, And there is no god besides Me" Deuteronomy 32:39
  5. "Hear, O Israel! Yahweh is our God, Yahweh is one [echad]!" Deuteronomy 6:4
  6. "You are great, O Lord God; for there is none like You, and there is no God besides You" 2 Samuel 7:22
  7. "For who is God, besides Yahweh? And who is a rock, besides our God?" 2 Samuel 22:32
  8. "Yahweh is God; there is no one else." 1 Kings 8:60
  9. "You are the God, You alone, of all the kingdoms of the earth." 2 Kings 19:15
  10. "O Lord, there is none like You, nor is there any God besides You" 1 Chronicles 17:20
  11. "You alone are Yahweh." Nehemiah 9:6
  12. "For who is God, but Yahweh? And who is a rock, except our God" Psalm 18:31
  13. "You alone, Lord, are God." Isaiah 37:20
  14. "Before Me there was no God formed, And there will be none after Me." Isaiah 43:10
  15. "'I am the first and I am the last, And there is no God besides Me." Isaiah 44:6
  16. "Is there any God besides Me, Or is there any other Rock? I know of none." Isaiah 44:8
  17. "I am Yahweh, and there is no other; Besides Me there is no God." Isaiah 45:5
  18. "Surely, God is with you, and there is none else, No other God." Isaiah 45:14
  19. "I am Yahweh, and there is none else." Isaiah 45:18
  20. "Is it not I, Yahweh? And there is no other God besides Me, A righteous God and a Savior; There is none except Me." Isaiah 45:21
  21. "I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is no one like Me" Isaiah 46:9
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,469
20,759
Orlando, Florida
✟1,513,336.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Jesus resurrection was the vindication of his mission and victory over his enemies.

Jesus' divinity primarily is known from his relationship to the Father and his authority over creation, not directly with the resurrection.
 
Upvote 0

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
13,761
5,823
60
Mississippi
✟322,399.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
I am not desperate to prove anything to you, you will be the one, to which your beliefs will determine your future destination.
 
Upvote 0

Theo Barnsley

Active Member
Jan 4, 2019
137
87
30
Auckland
✟28,650.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Engaged
I am not desperate to prove anything to you, you will be the one, to which your beliefs will determine your future destination.
My beliefs could be wrong, but your beliefs could be equally wrong. You have no evidence supporting your beliefs, only faith. The reason you require faith is because you have no evidence!

You cannot answer why the O.T. claims over & over again that 'God is One & there is no other', which means that Jesus cannot be god, & that there is no trinity. The evidence of the O.T. is that Jesus cannot be the prophesied Messiah, so maybe you have faith in the wrong religion!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.