Oh, you just get to cut out the inconvenient data points? Cool.Hmmm and if you remove the skewed examples like LA, NO, and Chicago...what happens to your argument?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Oh, you just get to cut out the inconvenient data points? Cool.Hmmm and if you remove the skewed examples like LA, NO, and Chicago...what happens to your argument?
Those places are some of the places with the STRICTEST gun control, and yet they have some of the HIGHEST rates of homicide.Oh, you just get to cut out the inconvenient data points? Cool.
Great. Not remotely the point, though.Most guns have never shot a single person.
Those were PEOPLE not objects that can be used by people for harm.Great. Not remotely the point, though.
Most refugees aren't terrorists, yet I seem to remember certain people around here who felt the risk was unacceptable...
And?Those places are some of the places with the STRICTEST gun control, and yet they have some of the HIGHEST rates of homicide.
Oh, so that makes the double standard OK? Cool.Those were PEOPLE not objects that can be used by people for harm.
How many ways are there to produce mass casualties?I did not deny that, but not all shootings are mass shootings. In fact most of them are not. You and I both know there are MANY ways to commit homicide.
How many ways are there to produce mass casualties?
People blaming GUNS for shootings would be like people blaming cars for driving drunk. In both cases we are talking about a TOOL that does NOTHING in and of itsself unless acted upon.And?
So it is clear that it is not working if the places that try the hardest to restrict them are the SAME places where they are the supposed largest issue.And?
Cars, box cutters, bombs, lethal gas guns are not the only way.How many ways are there to produce mass casualties?
Great. We're not worrying about what the tool does by itself, we're worried about what people do with them. Unless you know of a way to commit a mass shooting without a firearm?People blaming GUNS for shootings would be like people blaming cars for driving drunk. In both cases we are talking about a TOOL that does NOTHING in and of itsself unless acted upon.
And why don't they work? Could it be that some of the states with the strictest laws are right next to ones with very lose laws?So it is clear that it is not working if the places that try the hardest to restrict them are the SAME places where they are the supposed largest issue.
Great. We're not worrying about what the tool does by itself, we're worried about what people do with them. Unless you know of a way to commit a mass shooting without a firearm?
Ever made an explosive? How about a lethal gas?Cars, box cutters, bombs, lethal gas guns are not the only way.
And why don't they work? Could it be that some of the states with the strictest laws are right next to ones with very lose laws?
We are talking about cites. Just because a STATE has lose gun laws in SOME states cities are permitted to have stricter gun laws.And why don't they work? Could it be that some of the states with the strictest laws are right next to ones with very lose laws?
Which by the way lasted LESS than a score for JUST that reason.Sounds like an admission that laws that PROHIBIT something (remember Prohibition?) only creates a black market.
That must be why every developed country has comparable rates of gun violence. Oh wait, no they don't.Sounds like an admission that laws that PROHIBIT something (remember Prohibition?) only creates a black market.