Very funny, how can the keystone cops of box science be expected to investigate anything but the box?
Hold still, you're dodging again.
Good boy, thats just what I wanted to hear.
OK, so my ideas were so bad they were no more stable than modern science!
More to the point, there's no way to falsify your ideas.
The moment something 'supernatural' is revealed to be a normal process or whatever, you can just claim there's still more, or we don't know enough or somesuch excuse.
Proving God is a well known test
I thought that you couldnt prove god, and that you had to accept his existance on faith alone? Or is that just an 'interpretation'?
We won't need any heat from the sun any more. How things have to work in this physical only universe we see is great, but we cannot dream of limiting merged forever realities with pitiful, puny, present processes
I'm not talking about 'needing' the heat.
I'm talking about the massive amount of energy that would be released when particals moving at an infinite speed impact.
Unless of course you're going to say it doesn't matter, and we'll all live in a magicworld without consequences and without evidence or justification or basis in reality.
A fantasty land if you will.
The bible indicates that travel can trancend time and space. Spirit 'mass' has different properties, such as Jesus suddenly appearing, going through walls, disappearing, etc. Yet He still cooked and ate fish. Light and heat from the sun will no longer be needed. The light that reached us from distant stars could not have been our physical universe present light, as time would forbib that, it is too slow. Energy also will work different. We will not have to eat, but could if we wish. The sun will never burn out, as it is forever, so energy must work differently. etc
I gottacha.
Everything you've been talking about is you trying to rationalise the inconsistances that the your biblical interpretation has with reality.
"The earth is 6000 years old, but there are stars more and 6000 light years away, therefore lightspeed must have been infinite before the 'split"
"My biblical endtimes fantasy violates known laws of physics therefore the laws must be wrong and ignorable"
In the sense that science has nothing to do with God, you are right. The point is, physical only science cannot be superimposed on a spirit affected world past, to the ommision of people's beliefs in a creator with any authority now. It cannot prove wrong the split, even when we understand it to have gone on till flood time. So don't teach children it can.
You STILL didn't answer the question.
Why is your interpretation of the layout of the universe as detailed in the bible, correct when others are not?Hell, I'll even rephrase it for you.
Why is your interpretation of the bibles description of the universe correct, when others are not?