• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Was God's Kingdom already established in 70 AD ? - Preterism views

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hidden Manna

Veteran
Feb 21, 2004
1,206
11
69
✟16,418.00
Faith
Christian
bryanhilton said:
Sorry dude, but Daniel 9:27 states:
(taken from biblegateway.com)
27 He will confirm a covenant with many for one 'seven.' [a] In the middle of the 'seven' he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on a wing of the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him.

I don't think Jesus set up "an abomination that causes desolation" Wanna try again? :confused:


Try a better translation

(NKJV) Daniel 9:27 Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week; But in the middle of the week He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering. And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate, Even until the consummation, which is determined, Is poured out on the desolate."

It does not mean what you say according to your translation.

And on the wing of abominations: any sacrifice after the cross would have been a total abomination because the blood of Christ was all that is needed and to reject that and make any other kind of sacrifice would not be accepted by the Father, and the Jews tried but failed.


shall be one who makes desolate: Which is way the end of the temple system came to an end.

So DUDE try again next time show some respect and honor all men.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married


Hidden Manna;
"Now we request you, brethren, with regard to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and our gathering together to Him, that you may not be quickly shaken from your composure or be disturbed either by a spirit or a message or a letter as if from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come." (II Thessalonians 2:1-2. New American Standard)
A similar passage is found in II Timothy 2:16-18. What is so challenging about these verses to the futurist view? Please ask yourself the following question: If the day of the Lord is, as you and I have always been traditionally taught, a time ending, universe destroying event, with people literally coming out of their graves how in the world could the Thessalonians ever have been convinced, as they obviously were, that the day of the Lord had already come?


That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
at hand;
1) to place in or among, to put in

2) to be upon, impend, threaten

3) close at hand

4) present

The point is that the Thessalonians had been lied to, and Paul was writing to tell them the truth and to remind them that that day could not come until the Church was taken out of the way, as the Restrainer, the man child, sons of God who shall be caught up to heaven and to the throne at the rapture, and the the gathering must come in the air to the LORD of the living and the dead in their resurrected bodies because he had told them that already -and their faith was being overthrown by liars; but He said that day cannot come until the gathering together to Him in the air of the Church -living and dead- resurrected in bodies and changed in bodies, and when the Church is taken out of the way as the Light of God in earth, then the final man of sin cannot be revealed,
for that day is a day [God's days begin with night] in which there is no brightness =the glory of God shining in the Church in this earth.


They were no different from Believers today, whose faith can be overtherown by liars, if they believe them, rather than the clear Word and promises of God, and those who do not preach the coming kingdom and repentence and faith in the soon coming King, but work to overthrow the faith of some, saying the resurrection is past -no matter that the bodies are still in the graves and shall not be at the resurrection of the dead and the dissapearance of the living- are overthrowing the faith of some and destroying the hope of the Church, and are totally not speaking for the LORD or according to His revealed Word.

PS please don't use the merry go round that the passage in 2 Thessalonians was speaking of a departing of the Chuuch from the faith -that is a total misinterpretation of the passage, for the Word is the departing in the subject of the passage, which is, the gathering together in the air of Believers to Him at the resurrection and rapture: the Church departs from the earth, not from the faith, in 2 thessalonians, as the restrainer, by the brightness of His shining, that it is since Pentecost, and the man child caught up [raptured, laqach] to the throne is the Church, which is also the bride, and the sons of God, but the Church restrains the evil one from revealing the final man of sin by it's presence in earth.


 
Upvote 0

bryanhilton

Member
Jan 3, 2006
58
4
45
North Carolina
Visit site
✟22,698.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Hidden Manna said:
Try a better translation

(NKJV) Daniel 9:27 Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week; But in the middle of the week He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering. And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate, Even until the consummation, which is determined, Is poured out on the desolate."

It does not mean what you say according to your translation.

And on the wing of abominations: any sacrifice after the cross would have been a total abomination because the blood of Christ was all that is needed and to reject that and make any other kind of sacrifice would not be accepted by the Father, and the Jews tried but failed.


shall be one who makes desolate: Which is way the end of the temple system came to an end.

So DUDE try again next time show some respect and honor all men.

I love how you know to use the caps when you are angry or feel that you have made your point. I am in no way trying to get you mad bro, but according to KJV since you would like to use a different version, okay thats fine if you look at 26 and 27. Keep in mind the author is speaking not to Christians but the Jewish people because he refered to the following in Daniel 10:14

14Now I am come to make thee understand what shall befall thy people in the latter days: for yet the vision is for many days.

Now Daniel 9:26-27

26And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
27And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

Oh yea, forgot to mention that Jesus said who this verse is refering to as well in Matthew 24:15-16:

15When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand: )
16Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains



Does this clear things up? :)
 
Upvote 0

Hidden Manna

Veteran
Feb 21, 2004
1,206
11
69
✟16,418.00
Faith
Christian
bryanhilton said:
I love how you know to use the caps when you are angry or feel that you have made your point. I am in no way trying to get you mad bro, but according to KJV since you would like to use a different version, okay thats fine if you look at 26 and 27. Keep in mind the author is speaking not to Christians but the Jewish people because he refered to the following in Daniel 10:14

14Now I am come to make thee understand what shall befall thy people in the latter days: for yet the vision is for many days.

Now Daniel 9:26-27

26And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
27And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

Oh yea, forgot to mention that Jesus said who this verse is refering to as well in Matthew 24:15-16:

15When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand: )
16Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains



Does this clear things up? :)

Yup, I fully understand your view crystal clear and I believed it for 18 years then became a SDA for 10 years because there view made more sense, then I became a full Preterist because there view is the truth and makes way more sense.

How long have you studied every end-time view out there with out being swayed to what the people you know believe in order to understand what the truth may be?


Two Preterist views on Daniel 9

There are basically two preterist views on Daniel nine. One puts a gap of a generation between the 69th and 70th weeks. The other has no gap. I believe that gapless theory was the interpretation of the majority of the church for eighteen centuries until dispensationalism came along.

Ok, I will try to explain the two preterist theories I have encountered concerning Daniel’s 70 weeks.
Noe/Stevens:
These folks have a gapless 70 weeks. They put the cross at the middle of the 70th week. Their reasoning comes from Daniel 9:27.

27 Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week;
But in the middle of the week
He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering.
And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate,
Even until the consummation, which is determined,
Is poured out on the desolate.”

Daniel 9:27 (NKJV)
What brings an end to the sacrifice is not the events in A.D. 66 but the crucifixion of Christ. I suppose the cross did end the need for sacrifice in God’s eyes, however, as you know, the daily sacrifices continued until A.D. 66 (Dan 12:11), and the total cessation of sacrifices did not occur until A.D. 70. So, from a certain perspective this theory is plausible.

Now, what about the week of “confirming the covenant? ” I know futurists interpret this as cutting or making a covenant with many people for only one week of years. However, most translations I have encountered use the word “confirm” not “make” here. The only translation I found that uses the phrase “he will make a firm covenant with the many for one week” is the NASB. However, the dispensational bias of this translation is a bit startling.

This leaves us with 3 _ years before the cross for confirming the covenant and 3 _ years after the cross for confirming the covenant. According to Noe this corresponds to the time when the Gospel of the kingdom (New Covenant) was preached solely to the Jews. This encompasses the ministry of Jesus and the 3 _ year period after until the gospel was freed to go to the gentiles.

Now, what about this mess with the Romans and the apostate and unbelieving Jews that preceded A.D. 70? Noe relegates this to Daniel’s “time of the end.” That is the 1,209- 1,335 days that Daniel speaks of in Daniel 12:11.


24 “Seventy weeks are determined For your people and for your holy city, To finish the transgression, To make an end of sins, To make reconciliation for iniquity, To bring in everlasting righteousness, To seal up vision and prophecy, And to anoint the Most Holy. 25 “Know therefore and understand, That from the going forth of the command To restore and build Jerusalem Until Messiah the Prince, There shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks; The street shall be built again, and the wall, Even in troublesome times. 26 “And after the sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself; And the people of the prince who is to come Shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end of it shall be with a flood, And till the end of the war desolations are determined. 27 Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week; But in the middle of the week He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering. And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate, Even until the consummation, which is determined, Is poured out on the desolate.” (Daniel 9:24-27 NKJV)

Now, on to King’s timeline. Notice it begins with the decree to rebuild the temple and it ends with the destruction of the temple and the holy city.

King begins his timeline with the decree of Artaxerxes in 445 B.C. and ends the 69th week at the same point you do, the crucifixion of Christ. I believe this is the same as your timeline.

Then there is a gap between the 69th and 70th weeks albeit a small gap of less than 40 years.

Then “…the people of the prince who is to come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary.” The premillennial view of the prince who is to come is that this is some sort of Antichrist who will appear in some future day. Yet, look back at verse 25, and you will see the “prince” clearly identified. It is the Lord Himself.

This passage says “the people of the prince who is to come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary.” Who were these people? Well, who were God’s people at the time of Daniel? It was the Jews. You might ask was it not Titus, the Roman general who destroyed Jerusalem and the temple? No, history records that vast majority of the destruction that came in this final time came at the hands of the Jews themselves. They desecrated the temple and killed each other in the madness of this final hour. Titus merely mopped up.

Verse 27 says that during this 70th week the prince will confirm (And the word here is not cut or make a covenant. This is simply not the covenantal language that probably would have been used here if an entirely new covenant had been made for a week of years.) a covenant with many.

How could this refer to the destruction and abominations that came during this time? Think about what was happening just before this time of the end. First the temple was still standing, the sacrifices and rituals were still being performed. To the unbelieving and apostate Jews this was a very great sign that they were right and the Christians were wrong. When the Law free gospel was preached, all they had to do was point to the Temple and say that the Law and thus the Old Covenant was still in effect. Moreover, the presence of the Temple gave them a feeling of invincibility. How could Rome prevail when God’s presence (as represented by the temple) is with us?

Second, just before this time many of the church leaders were taken out of the way. James, the leader of the church in Jerusalem was executed and Paul was imprisoned. The early church was not only facing the wrath of the Jews but also of Nero. What would you think God was saying by all this if you were a Jew at this time? You would think the New Covenant was a sham.

Then suddenly confirmation of the New Covenant and vindication for the early believers came in the most powerful way.

What then are the abominations that Daniel speaks of in verse 27? Did they happen? Absolutely! The Holy place was desecrated by Jewish zealots before Titus marched on Jerusalem. They desecrated the temple with murder and all sorts of blasphemy. In fact the High Priest Ananus was quoted as saying “certainly it would have been good for me to die before I had seen the house of God full of so many abominations.”

Moreover, the daily sacrifices in the Temple indeed ceased during this time just as prophesied.

These things did happen. Therefore, history itself is one of the strongest proofs of Preterism. You can’t argue with history.

Now, some say that the Temple will be rebuilt so all these things can happen again? Where is the logic in that?

Let me end by quoting Max King on the matter.

“The attempt of premillenarians to rebuild earthly Jerusalem and restore the animal sacrifice system and posit this as the fulfillment of Israel’s promised future contradicts every prophesy in the Old Testament and every eschatological scripture written in the New Testament, as well as the facts of history that confirm the complete fulfillment of all post-Pentecost futurism with in the time frame of the iron mixed with clay beast and the seventy weeks of Daniel.”


BTW I as not mad but I got close to it because of past experinces with people calling others Dude. In all cases people did so to show disrespect and superiority and it always turned me off or made me :mad:

But seeing that you called me Bro :thumbsup:

God Bless
 
Upvote 0

bryanhilton

Member
Jan 3, 2006
58
4
45
North Carolina
Visit site
✟22,698.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
God bless you too man! I know that we agree to disagree which makes this fun (to me anyways ;) ) and I just call alot of people "dude"; even my friends most of the time! I never meant to offend you and I apologize if I did, thats just part of my daily talk I guess. Anyways, What about the one world government, all worshiping the beast and the prophet, the mark of the beast in the right hand and forehead, the temple being rebuilt (which I think I remember hearing that the sanhedran [not sure about the spelling] is working on now in Israel) and the antichrist ruling from the temple being kept from the hour of temptation that shall come upon the whole world, etc. etc. The world is crying out for a so called leader to provide peace and stability and to me it ties right in to Bible prophecy for the last days from what I have studied. Also, you never mentioned anything concerning what Jesus said in Matthew 24:15-15:

15When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand: )
16Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains

What is your view of these things and where do you see it tying into the preterist views?
 
Upvote 0

Hidden Manna

Veteran
Feb 21, 2004
1,206
11
69
✟16,418.00
Faith
Christian
bryanhilton said:
Anyways, What about the one world government, all worshiping the beast and the prophet, the mark of the beast in the right hand and forehead, the temple being rebuilt (which I think I remember hearing that the sanhedran [not sure about the spelling] is working on now in Israel) and the antichrist ruling from the temple being kept from the hour of temptation that shall come upon the whole world, etc. etc. The world is crying out for a so called leader to provide peace and stability and to me it ties right in to Bible prophecy for the last days from what I have studied. Also, you never mentioned anything concerning what Jesus said in Matthew 24:15-15:

15When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand: )
16Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains

What is your view of these things and where do you see it tying into the preterist views?

Lots of questions and I do got good answers for them all which if you were to read all my posting on this tread I'm sure you would get a good idea of that the real truth is behind all this end-time maddness which every generation since the cross has thought they were in.

How about this, you keep a record of all those questions and we can go though this all again but one thing at a time.

I'll start off with the Last Days and who the scriptures say were in them.

I'll be coping and pasting alot of the best, it saves me time as I only type with one finger per hand and have to hunt and peck otherwise.

The Biblical Last Days.

To understand out study of the “last days” and show how it could be possible, they were fulfilled in the last days of the Old Covenant there are three very important Biblical truths that must be established. First, the years from the cross to the desolation of Jewish system in Jerusalem in the A.D. 70 is the last days of the covenant of the law. It is stated time and again that the New Testament was written in the final years of the “world that then was,” otherwise known as the Old Covenant or Old Testament era (Heb. 1:2). This is the period of the “last days”, or “end of the age,” which saw its fulfillment.

By presenting Scripture in such a way, as to allow it to speak for itself, we will see that the New Testament is a collection of books written in the “last days” of the Old Covenant, all of which display the ‘earnest expectation’ of the believers that the last days would be in their lifetimes.

Second, The faithfulness of God. Remember, God is faithful, II Peter 3:9. “God is not a man that he should lie,” Numbers 23:19. The faithfulness of God not only involves doing WHAT has been promised, it means doing it WHEN IT WAS PROMISED

Third, The time statements in the Bible. In Daniel 10-12 is a vision encompassing a period of time from 536 BC to the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD; about 600 years. Two times in this text Daniel was told “the appointed time is long” and “the vision refers to many days to come” (10:1,14). Remember, this vision was relayed to Daniel from God. While God is not bound by time, he was communicating to man who is bound to time. God called this 600 year period of time “long;” he said it involved “many days.” God can most assuredly tell time and read a calendar!

Before we begin our study on the last days let me first say that while God is not bound by time like man when God speaks to man He speaks in a language that man can understand, thus when something is said to happens “soon” in man’s time God is recognized as “faithful and true” to His promise when it is fulfilled. God gives us an illustrations of His “true faithfulness” in the event of the birth of Isaac. Isaac was born at the set time of which God promised Abraham (see Genesis 18:13-14; 21:1-3)

The Bible says it is inspired, II Timothy 3:16. The original word translated “inspired” literally means “God breathed.” The thought of the Bible being from God suggests that since God is perfect or infallible, and the Bible is from Him it ought to be infallible as well. Specifically, if the Bible made a promise that something would happen within a specified time frame, if that event did not happen when and as promised the Bible’s claim to inspiration falls.

It is Jehovah himself that gave the criteria for determining whether a prophet was true or false; if a prophet’s prediction did not come true (within the time the prophet said it would) he was a false prophet, (see Deuteronomy 18:19-22) If God does not keep the when part of his promises, he has not kept his promise! The inspiration of the scriptures demands complete fulfillment of every aspect of God’s promises.

God’s years are endless; “from everlasting to everlasting thou art God” Psalms 90:2. Isaiah calls Jehovah “the Father of eternity” 9:6-9. However when God communicate with man, he uses (time statements) that man can understand. What are time statements?
The time statements are how “God communicates with man in terms of Time.” The time statements are literal imminent statements as seen in (Genesis 18:13-14; 21:1-3) The time statements refer to soon events of Jewish importance.

In Ezekiel 7, God through Ezekiel said the Day of the Lord was at hand. The Day of the Lord in this context was when God used Babylon to punish Israel for her sin. This is the concept of the Day of the Lord; it is not an “end of time” idea. It is when God used a nation to punish another as it related to his chosen people. In chapter 11 Israel responded to the threat of coming judgment. They insisted that although Ezekiel said it was at hand it was really not. It was time to build houses, not worry about judgment. One can almost hear some of those people: “Well, yes, Ezekiel has said the Day of the Lord is at hand, but after all, ‘one day is with the Lord as a thousand years and a thousand years is as a day,’ Psalms 90:4”

When Israel “elasticized” God’s words of imminence into relativity, ambiguity and meaning-less-ness, God responded. In Ezekiel 12:21ff, [Please, take the time to get your Bible and read it for yourself!] Adonai told Ezekiel to tell Israel that her days of changing the time for his predictions were over. He had said judgment was at hand; Israel said it was not at hand. Jehovah would not tolerate it.

Ezekiel was instructed to tell Israel that in that generation judgment would fall just as Jehovah had indicated when he said it was at hand. [Have you read those verses for yourself yet? If not, why not do it right now and see for yourself that what we are saying is true?] What we have then, is an example of man saying that while God had said something was imminent it really was not; it was for a long time off. We have God’s response; when God said “at hand” he meant “at hand!” He did not mean hundreds or thousands of years; he meant “soon!” God, Himself rebukes this interpretation of His time statements. “God employed the language of humanity to communicate His message in the Bible to humanity in humanity’s own time statements.

Another example of man changing the meaning of God’s time words is in Amos. God warned Israel the time had come for her to be judged, 8:2-3. In spite of the warnings Israel “put far off the evil day.” In spite of God’s warning that judgment was at hand they insisted “All things continue as they were,” They refused to believe God meant “the end has come.” As a result God said “Woe” to them for putting of His words! 6:3. As we have just seen if God do not keep the when part of the time statements then He has not kept his promise! Jehovah would not tolerate this interpretation of His time statements. He rebukes it Himself in scripture.

Most honest students of the Bible already realize that the New Testament is full of time statements that point to an imminent last days of the Old Covenant. Once Scripture is allowed to speak for itself, one cannot honestly deny the overwhelming amount of Scripture passages which declare that the last day prophecies were to “shortly come to pass.” By listing these numerous verses, we can see that the first century saints believed they were living in the last days of the Old Covenant. Peter specifies. “Who (Christ) verily was fore ordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you.” (1 Peter 1:20)

The apostle John made a similar statement: 1 John 2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. Here, the same word “eschatos” is used for “last.” However, the Greek word for “time” is slightly different, though very related: it is the Greek word “hora” defined by Strong’s as: 5610. hora, ho’-rah; appar. a prim. word; an “hour” (lit. or fig.):--day, hour, instant, season, X short, [even-] tide, (high) time.

John believed they were in the last or farthest season or hour of the Jewish age.

Peter specifies the range of this period, commonly called the “last days,” in his sermon in Acts 2:16-21. He declares that, it was fulfilling the prophecy of (Joel 2:28-32). What is significant about Peter’s statement is that he was claiming that they were in the last days. The writer of Hebrews expressed this identical sentiment as he began his discourse comparing the fading Old Covenant with the Everlasting New Covenant:

Hebrews 1:1-2 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spoke in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, {2} Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; Jesus was manifested, not at the beginning, or start of the last days but “during the last days.” The period between A.D. 30 and 70 is, as the apostle Peter describes it, “these last times” (1 Peter 1:20).

“Hath in these last days” the writer confirms. Without any speculation those in the first century believed they were in the last days. Certainly the writers of the New Testament were very aware of those passages we have studied involving the last days of Judah and Jerusalem. Therefore it is safe and logical to say that the New Testament writers believed that they were in the last days of the Jewish age.

The apostle John made this time statement: 1 John 2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. Here, the same word “eschatos” is used for “last.” However, the Greek word for “time” is slightly different, though very related: it is the Greek word “hora” defined by Strong’s as: 5610. hora, ho’-rah; appar. a prim. word; an “hour” (lit. or fig.):--day, hour, instant, season, X short, [even-] tide, (high) time.

John believed they were in the last or farthest season or hour of the Jewish age. Paul believed the same:

Rom 13:11 And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed. There are two different Greek words used here translated as “time.” In the first cause Paul says “knowing the time.” The Greek word here is “2540. kairos, kahee-ros’; of uncert. affin.; an occasion, i.e. set or proper time:--X always, opportunity, (convenient, due) season, (due, short, while) time, a while. Comp. G5550.” Strong’s.

In the second clause Paul uses the phrase “high time.” “High time” is the same Greek word used in first John. Both Paul and John firmly believed that they were in the last time or days of the Jewish age. Paul believed they were living in the end of the Jewish age as well: 1 Cor 10:11 Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the age are come.

Paul was describing the history of the Jews and their rebellion against God in the wilderness. We should not ignore the fact that Paul, in discussing the ancient rebellion which took place in the wilderness says it was written for their admonition, upon whom the ends of the age are come.

New consider the time statements of James as he addressed the unbelieving Jews: James 5:1-4 Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you. Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are moth eaten. Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days. Clearly James taught that these men were in the last days.

Jude, in describing the same group of unbelieving Jews, also speaks of this period, although with a different phrase: But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ; How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts. (Jude 1:17-18)

The word “time” is the Greek word chronos, defined by Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance as: 5550. chronos, khron’-os; a space of time. The word “last” is defined as: 2078. eschatos, es’-khat-os; a superl. prob. from G2192 (in the sense of contiguity); farthest, final (of place or time):--ends of, last, latter end, lowest, uttermost. Certainly we can conclude from Jude that they were in the farthest or uttermost space of time of the Jewish age. They were in the last days of the Jewish state.

The impression of the Apostles is the nearness of ‘the end’ is worthy of notice that there is a marked gradation in the language of the different epistles. Going from know that in the last days perilous times will come To the last times and the last times became the last days, and the last days become the last hour [escath wra esti]. The period of expectation and delay was now over and the decisive moment was at hand. “And that, knowing the time.. The night is far spent, the day is at hand. (“Romans 13:11-12)

There are many other passages that could be used to support the fact that the first-century believers and particularly the apostles believed unanimously that they were in the end of the Jewish age or the last days of the Jewish age. The fact is that anytime Scripture uses the phase “last days” it means, a period from 30-70 AD. This was the period during which the Apostles were preaching and writing, the “last days” of Old Covenant Israel before it was forever destroyed in the destruction of the Temple (and the Old Covenant sacrificial system) not the end of the world or physical universe.

Now just to show that Israel today does not fit the picture I'll post one more after this, than you ask me questions about them and give another one of your recorded questions to me.
 
Upvote 0

Hidden Manna

Veteran
Feb 21, 2004
1,206
11
69
✟16,418.00
Faith
Christian
Israel Reborn or Judged

I never thought of the Jews in our day fulfilling any Bible prophecy because they are not the biblical Jews or Israel that is in the Bible.

1948 Israel?
The reestablishment of the state of Israel in 1948 is considered to be the most important sign that the second coming is near. One of the great problems with this dispensational view is that there is no rebirth of Israel or rebuilt temple mentioned anywhere in the New Testament. Nor is the supposed re-gathering of the Jews to their homeland. This is puzzling, because if the rebirth of Israel is the “super sign,” you would think it would be very prominent in prophetic passages such as Matt. 24 and Revelation. It simply is not.

There is only one passage that dispensationalists point to that they say speaks of the rebirth of Israel and that is in Matt. 24.
“Now learn the parable from the fig tree: when its branch has already become tender and puts forth its leaves, you know that summer is near; so, you too, when you see all these things, recognize that He is near, right at the door.”

The thought is that the fig tree represents a re-born Israel. However, other passages in the New Testament cast doubt upon this interpretation. In Matthew 24’s parallel passage in Luke 21 Jesus says to “look at the fig tree and all the trees. When they are already budding, you see and know for yourselves that summer is now near (Luke 21:29-30).” Are we talking about the rebirth of many nations here? It is far more logical to assume that Jesus was merely using the fig tree(s) as an object lesson.

Moreover, other passages that could associate Israel with a fig tree always speak of judgment and never of any sort of rebirth.
“Now in the morning, as He returned to the city, He was hungry. And seeing a fig tree by the road, He came to it and found nothing on it but leaves, and said to it, ‘Let no fruit grow on you ever again.’ Immediately the fig tree withered away.

And when the disciples saw it, they marveled, saying, ‘How did the fig tree wither away so soon?’

So Jesus answered and said to them, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, if you have faith and do not doubt, you will not only do what was done to the fig tree, but also if you say to this mountain, ‘Be removed and be cast into the sea,’ it will be done.’” Matthew 21:18-21

Most scholars believe this particular fig tree did represent Old Covenant Israel. It was about to pass away and never bear fruit again. Jesus was not just mad because he wanted some figs and could not get any. Moreover, never again means never again.

Furthermore, when Jesus said that if they had faith and did not doubt, they would not only do what was done to the fig tree, but they could also say to this mountain “Be removed and be cast into the sea,” and it would be done. Was Jesus given them permission to tear up actual mountains and cast them into the sea? No, He was talking about something spiritual.

For you have not come to the mountain that may be touched and that burned with fire, and to blackness and darkness and tempest, and the sound of a trumpet and the voice of words, so that those who heard it begged that the word should not be spoken to them anymore. (For they could not endure what was commanded: “And if so much as a beast touches the mountain, it shall be stoned or shot with an arrow.” And so terrifying was the sight that Moses said, “I am exceedingly afraid and trembling.”)

But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, to an innumerable company of angels, to the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are registered in heaven, to God the Judge of all, to the spirits of just men made perfect, to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel. Hebrews 12:18-24

If they had faith, they would see the Old Covenant which was represented by Mount Sinai torn up and cast away. And indeed it was.

Let us consider another parable with a fig tree.

“I tell you, no, but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish. Or do you suppose that those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them were worse culprits than all the men who live in Jerusalem? I tell you, no, but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.” And He began telling this parable: “A man had a fig tree which had been planted in his vineyard; and he came looking for fruit on it and did not find any. And he said to the vineyard-keeper, ‘Behold, for three years I have come looking for fruit on this fig tree without finding any. Cut it down! Why does it even use up the ground?’ And he answered and said to him, ‘Let it alone, sir, for this year too, until I dig around it and put in fertilizer; and if it bears fruit next year, fine; but if not, cut it down.’” (Luke 9:3-9)

Obviously, the fig tree is not a nation about to be reborn, but one that was about to be judged, and indeed it was. It is interesting that Jesus probably told this parable in the third year of His ministry.
Next we must look at the covenantal implications of the rebirth of Israel. God’s promise to give the Jews the land of Israel as their inheritance was an Old Covenant promise. This begs the question is the Old Covenant still in effect? If we say it passed away with the coming of the New Covenant, then so did the promise of the land.

However, if we say that it is still in effect for the Jews, we still run into problems. In the scriptures the promise that the Jews would hold the land of Israel was conditional. Deuteronomy 28 tells us “If you are not careful to do all the words of this law … you shall be plucked off the land that you are entering to take possession of it, And the LORD will scatter you among all the peoples, from one end of the earth to the other. …” If the people who now live in Israel are not keeping the Law of Moses (and they can’t be. The Mosaic Law ceased to be observed in AD. 70, and it has never been observed in full since.), how can we say that God has given them the land back?

Even if you say that God’s covenant with Abraham to give the Jews the physical land of Israel is still in effect, look what the Bible says are God’s conditions for remembering His promise.

“But if they confess their iniquity and the iniquity of their fathers, with their unfaithfulness in which they were unfaithful to Me, and that they also have walked contrary to Me, and that I also have walked contrary to them and have brought them into the land of their enemies; if their uncircumcised hearts are humbled, and they accept their guilt— then I will remember My covenant with Jacob, and My covenant with Isaac and My covenant with Abraham I will remember; I will remember the land, Leviticus 26:40-42.

Did the Jews meet this condition before the 1948 re-gathering? No! This dispensational view essentially makes God a liar!
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Every generation since Jesus Christ was born has been in the last days of this present creation.
The last day is coming soon, and that will be the 'seventh day', a Sabbath Rest for earth, in which all the wicked will be removed from the earth and be cast into the everlasting fire.

Jesus came into this world in the fullness of time, in the beginning of the fifth millennium, and the Earth has had two more millennums since Jesus Christ was incarnated, making it at it's seventh millennium -about now.
Each Millennium is counted as a day, to the LORD, and the Last Day is upon us, but it will begin with the "night" in which the Church will be gathered together to the LORD, at the resurrection of the dead and the rapture =laqach of the Church, and then the final man of sin will be able to be revealed.

Until the Church, which is the Restrainer of that man of sin, is gathered to the LORD and taken out of the way, the man of sin cannot be revealed, and this is the 'day of salvation', the age of grace: if anyone wants to enter into the kingdom and have a part in it, in the Firstborn, today is the day, while it is "today" to make peace with the LORD through the blood of His covenant.

As the 'Last Day' is the seventh, then the very 'last day' of the seventh thousand is upon this world; and His coming is sooner than when we first believed.

Maybe in about five minutes, the Father will give the order to call the entire congregation to the door of assembly, and He will descend from heaven with the dead in Christ whom He will bring with Him to the air, raise the dead bodies from the dust of this present creation, and change the bodies of we who are alive and remain, and then we shall rise to meet them in the air and then we shall be told to "come, enter into our chambers and shut our doors behind us until the indignation is past"!

Seven years, one week, in heaven, we'll be shut behind the temple doors, as our week of consecration as priests in our new holy garments that we will never remove, for they are our new bodies which are "laid up" for us in the temple in heaven (by faith), just as the priestly garments were 'laid up' in the temple for the priests to put on and take off when they entered the Presence of His glory, to serve.

these things are all taught in the oracles and the law; and the LORD does nothing without first revealing it to His prophets: from Moses we have the plan, in the law and the oracles, of His salvation in the blood of the covenant and of His adoption of we of Adam as His sons, in the Firstborn, and of the holy garments of priesthood laid up in the temple to put on to serve Him in.
Our garments are the New Man bodies that we shall receive at the resurrection of the dead in Christ from the dust of this creation and of the regeneration of the bodies of the living Believers at His coming.
We have our 'under garments', so to speak, the linen tunic, by the New Birth in Spirit; but no priest enters the Presence without donning the outer garments of holiness, as taught in the oracles given to the Jews, and our garments are promised to be given to us to serve, and they are the regenerated bodies.
 
Upvote 0

notswift

Member
Dec 7, 2005
8
0
67
✟22,618.00
Faith
Christian
would not someone have wrote much about such a monumental event? that is, someone who had been expecting with great earnest the return of Christ.. such as John (who might have still been alive) or Titus, or Timothy or... any of the hundreds (or, thousands) of Christians then living - wouldnt there be at least one accounting of the fulfillment of all things have been written?.. and, certainly, wouldn't such a document have been found worthy of being at least considered for inclusion in the canon of Holy Scripture.. or, at least an accounting of the rejection of such a document by those entrusted to preserve the Truth? we seem to have several examples of rejected manuscripts from that era.
wouldn't it be feasable to consider that there are no documents of the sort which record the much awaited return of Christ from the era of AD70 because He did not then return? .. of course, there are documents of the destruction of the temple from that era... but, not of the return of Christ - wouldn't that have been the most important aspect of the temple's destruction?
and, nobody thought to at least make a slight mention of it for future followers?
btw... thanks all for such thoughtful posts :groupray:
... God speed! jef
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
notswift said:
would not someone have wrote much about such a monumental event? that is, someone who had been expecting with great earnest the return of Christ.. such as John (who might have still been alive) or Titus, or Timothy or... any of the hundreds (or, thousands) of Christians then living - wouldnt there be at least one accounting of the fulfillment of all things have been written?.. and, certainly, wouldn't such a document have been found worthy of being at least considered for inclusion in the canon of Holy Scripture.. or, at least an accounting of the rejection of such a document by those entrusted to preserve the Truth? we seem to have several examples of rejected manuscripts from that era.
wouldn't it be feasable to consider that there are no documents of the sort which record the much awaited return of Christ from the era of AD70 because He did not then return? .. of course, there are documents of the destruction of the temple from that era... but, not of the return of Christ - wouldn't that have been the most important aspect of the temple's destruction?
and, nobody thought to at least make a slight mention of it for future followers?
btw... thanks all for such thoughtful posts :groupray:
... God speed! jef
Especially Josephus, who wrote of Jesus briefly and was there, in 70 AD; but of course, Jesus is not reigning in earth on the throne of David; and the wicked generation, the tares, those sons of satan, are still with us -and the whole earth is lying in the wicked one, still -and of course, if He'd returned in 70 AD, we'd now be in the regenerated heavens and earth, for His reign will be a Sabbath rest of earth's last thousand years -then, again, I wouldn't have gotten to be born, as in the regeneration they do not marry nor give in marraige -and certainly do not procreate.
 
Upvote 0

Hidden Manna

Veteran
Feb 21, 2004
1,206
11
69
✟16,418.00
Faith
Christian
notswift said:
would not someone have wrote much about such a monumental event? that is, someone who had been expecting with great earnest the return of Christ.. such as John (who might have still been alive) or Titus, or Timothy or... any of the hundreds (or, thousands) of Christians then living - wouldnt there be at least one accounting of the fulfillment of all things have been written?.. and, certainly, wouldn't such a document have been found worthy of being at least considered for inclusion in the canon of Holy Scripture.. or, at least an accounting of the rejection of such a document by those entrusted to preserve the Truth? we seem to have several examples of rejected manuscripts from that era.
wouldn't it be feasable to consider that there are no documents of the sort which record the much awaited return of Christ from the era of AD70 because He did not then return? .. of course, there are documents of the destruction of the temple from that era... but, not of the return of Christ - wouldn't that have been the most important aspect of the temple's destruction?
and, nobody thought to at least make a slight mention of it for future followers?
btw... thanks all for such thoughtful posts :groupray:
... God speed! jef

Maybe some of the things John and some others wrote were burnt when the RCC burned up so many of the books written in order to dominate and control the people through false religion.

Here are some writing that were not burnt up


Ignatius of Antioch Disciple of Polycarp

Have you read the letters of Ignatius of Antioch? He was the second from the Apostle John to write many letters to the new testament churches. The first was Polycarp, who was a disciple of John, but he only wrote one letter to the Philippians that was mainly polemic. Ignatius (who was a disciple of Polycarp), however, makes clear preterist statements in his writings. His most powerful statement to the church of the Magnesians was "Jesus was with the Father in the beginning and has appeared at the end". He talks about how the OT prophets have already been raised (resurrected) and how we have already been gathered unto God. Clear statements of those things that would only occur at the Second Coming, yet Ignatius speaks of them in the past tense....as a present reality in his day.

You can't get any earlier than that. Talk about orthodox belief. Yet Preterist are called heretics.

James the Brother of Jesus was a preterist...

and they killed him for it.
James was martyred in AD 62. The story of his martyrdom can be found in Eusebius of Caesarea's work, Church History (AD 325), Book II, Chapter 23: The Martyrdom of James, who was called the Brother of the Lord : Here is the account -

~ ~ ~ But after Paul, in consequence of his appeal to C'sar, had been sent to Rome by Festus, the Jews, being frustrated in their hope of entrapping him by the snares which they had laid for him, turned against James, the brother of the Lord, to whom the episcopal seat at Jerusalem had been entrusted by the apostles. The following daring measures were undertaken by them against him. Leading him into their midst they demanded of him that he should renounce faith in Christ in the presence of all the people. But, contrary to the opinion of all, with a clear voice, and with greater boldness than they had anticipated, he spoke out before the whole multitude and confessed that our Saviour and Lord Jesus is the Son of God. But they were unable to bear longer the testimony of the man who, on account of the excellence of ascetic virtue and of piety, which he exhibited in his life, was esteemed by all as the most just of men, and consequently they slew him. Opportunity for this deed of violence was furnished by the prevailing anarchy, which was caused by the fact that Festus had died just at this time in Judea, and that the province was thus without a governor and head. The manner of James' death has been already indicated by the above-quoted words of Clement, who records that he was thrown from the pinnacle of the temple, and was beaten to death with a club. But Hegesippus, who lived immediately after the apostles, gives the most accurate account in the fifth book of his Memoirs.

He writes as follows: “James, the brother of the Lord, succeeded to the government of the Church in conjunction with the apostles. He has been called the Just by all from the time of our Saviour to the present day; for there were many that bore the name of James. He was holy from his mother's womb; and he drank no wine nor strong drink, nor did he eat flesh. No razor came upon his head; he did not anoint himself with oil, and he did not use the bath. He alone was permitted to enter into the holy place; for he wore not woolen but linen garments. And he was in the habit of entering alone into the temple, and was frequently found upon his knees begging forgiveness for the people, so that his knees became hard like those of a camel, in consequence of his constantly bending them in his worship of God, and asking forgiveness for the people. Because of his exceeding great justice he was called the Just, and Oblias, which signifies in Greek, 'Bulwark of the people' and 'Justice,' in accordance with what the prophets declare concerning him. Now some of the seven sects, which existed among the people and which have been mentioned by me in the Memoirs, asked him, 'What is the gate of Jesus? and he replied that he was the Saviour. On account of these words some believed that Jesus is the Christ. But the sects mentioned above did not believe either in a resurrection or in one's coming to give to every man according to his works. But as many as believed did so on account of James. Therefore when many even of the rulers believed, there was a commotion among the Jews and Scribes and Pharisees, who said that there was danger that the whole people would be looking for Jesus as the Christ. Coming therefore in a body to James they said, 'We entreat thee, restrain the people; for they are gone astray in regard to Jesus, as if he were the Christ. We entreat thee to persuade all that have come to the feast of the Passover concerning Jesus; for we all have confidence in thee. For we bear thee witness, as do all the people, that thou art just, and dost not respect persons. Do thou therefore persuade the multitude not to be led astray concerning Jesus. For the whole people, and all of us also, have confidence in thee. Stand therefore upon the pinnacle of the temple, that from that high position thou mayest be clearly seen, and that thy words may be readily heard by all the people. For all the tribes, with the Gentiles also, are come together on account of the Passover.'

The aforesaid Scribes and Pharisees therefore placed James upon the pinnacle of the temple, and cried out to him and said: 'Thou just one, in whom we ought all to have confidence, forasmuch as the people are led, astray after Jesus, the crucified one, declare to us, what is the gate of Jesus.' And he answered with a loud voice, 'Why do ye ask me concerning Jesus, the Son of Man? He himself sitteth in heaven at the right hand of the great Power, and is ABOUT TO COME upon the clouds of heaven.' And when many were fully convinced and gloried in the testimony of James, and said, 'Hosanna to the Son of David,' these same Scribes and Pharisees said again to one another, 'We have done badly in supplying such testimony to Jesus. But let us go up and throw him down, in order that they may be afraid to believe him.' And they cried out, saying, 'Oh! oh! the just man is also in error.' And they fulfilled the Scripture written in Isaiah, 'Let us take away the just man, because he is troublesome to us: therefore they shall eat the fruit of their doings.' So they went up and threw down the just man, and said to each other, 'Let us stone James the Just.' And they began to stone him, for he was not killed by the fall; but he turned and knelt down and said, 'I entreat thee, Lord God our Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.' And while they were thus stoning him one of the priests of the sons of Rechab, the son of the Rechabites, who are mentioned by Jeremiah the prophet, cried out, saying, 'Cease, what do ye? The just one prayeth for you.'

And one of them, who was a fuller, took the club with which he beat out clothes and struck the just man on the head. And thus he suffered martyrdom. And they buried him on the spot, by the temple, and his monument still remains by the temple. He became a true witness, both to Jews and Greeks, that Jesus is the Christ.”

______________________________

He told those people that Jesus was ABOUT TO COME on the clouds of heaven....and they martyred him for it. Was James the brother of Jesus wrong?


Charles H. Spurgeon believed we are NOW living in the new heaven and the new earth. Here is a exerpt from one of his sermons.

(On the New Heavens and Earth )
"Did you ever regret the absence of the burnt-offering, or the red heifer, of any one of the sacrifices and rites of the Jews? Did you ever pine for the feast of tabernacle, or the dedication? No, because, though these were like the old heavens and earth to the Jewish believers, they have passed away, and we now live under a new heavens and a new earth, so far as the dispensation of divine teaching is concerned. The substance is come, and the shadow has gone: and we do not remember it." (Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, vol. xxxvii, p. 354).

early church father Origen. If anyone is interested ....

225AD Origen (On The Faulty 'Literal Method of Bible Interpretation') "Many, not understanding the Scriptures in a spiritual sense, but incorrectly, have fallen into heresies." (Principles, 4:1:7) "8. Having spoken thus briefly on the subject of the divine inspiration of the the Holy Spirit, it seems necessary to explain this point also, viz., how certain persons, not reading them correctly, have given themselves over to erroneous opinions, inasmuch as the procedure to be followed, in order to attain an understanding of the holy writings, is unknown to many. The Jews, in fine, owing to the hardness of their heart, and from a desire to appear wise in their own eyes, have not believed in our Lord and Saviour, judging that those statements which were uttered respecting Him ought to be understood literally, i.e., that He ought in a sensible and visible manner to preach deliverance to the captives, and first build a city which they truly deem the city of God, and cut off at the same time the chariots of Ephraim, and the horse from Jerusalem; that He ought also to eat butter and honey, in order to choose the good before He should come to how how to bring forth evil. …They think, also, that it has been predicted that the wolf--that four-footed animal--is, at the coming of Christ, to feed with the lambs, and the leopard to lie down with kids, and the calf and the bull to pasture with lions, and that they are to be led by a little child to the pasture; that the ox and the bear are to lie down together in the green fields, and that their young ones are to be fed together; that lions also will frequent stalls with the oxen, and feed on straw. And seeing that, according to history, there was no accomplishment of any of those things predicted of Him, in which they believed the signs of Christ's advent were especially to be observed, they refused to acknowledge the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ; nay, contrary to all the principles of human and divine law, i.e., contrary to the faith of prophecy, they crucified Him for assuming to Himself the name of Christ. " (Principles, 4:1:7) … "Now the cause, in all the points previously enumerated, of the false opinions, and of the impious statements or ignorant assertions about God, appears to be nothing else than the not understanding the Scripture ACCORDING TO IT'S SPIRITUAL MEANING but the interpretation of it agreeably to the mere letter." (Principles, 4:1:8)

And the church at large is doing the exact same thing today that the Jews did back then.

Here is what Eusebius says concerning the belief in a literal 1000 year reign of Jesus on the earth.....

325AD Eusebius Pamphilius, Ecclesiastical History: (On the 'Millennial Reign' of Christ) "This same historian (Papias) also gives other accounts, which he says he adds as received by him from unwritten tradition, likewise certain strange parables of our Lord, and of His doctrine and some other matters rather too fabulous . In these he says there would be a certain millennium after the resurrection, and that there would be a corporeal reign of Christ on this very earth; which things he appears to have imagined, as if they were authorized by the apostolic narrations, not understanding correctly those matters which they propounded mystically in their representations. For he was very limited in his comprehension, as is evident from his discourses; yet he was the cause why most of the ecclesiastical writers, urging the antiquity of man, were carried away by a similar opinion; as, for instance, Irenaeus, or any other that adopted such sentiments. (Book III, Ch. 39)
So, he says that the belief in a literal 1000 year reign of Jesus on the earth is in error and were only things that are 'imagined". That the belief was because they didn't understand the mystical nature of what the apostles wrote.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
He is still about to come, hidden Manna. Very, very soon!
-in maybe just five minutes, only those ready will be taken out before He judges the inhabitants of the world and sets up His earthly kingdom.
When He comes, there will not be one wicked one left in the entire earth, and He will reign for a thousand eyars of Peace, for earth's Sabbath and the Last Day of it, in relation to it's beginning of days.
 
Upvote 0

notswift

Member
Dec 7, 2005
8
0
67
✟22,618.00
Faith
Christian
Hidden Manna said:
Maybe some of the things John and some others wrote were burnt when the RCC burned up so many of the books written in order to dominate and control the people through false religion.

Here are some writing that were not burnt up

this stuff is fascinating! ... i love Spurgeon's sermons, too :) ... a mini conclusion drawn upon the material you've submitted from one who is not too swift concerning such matters:
if the RCC burned up so many of the books written in order to dominate and control the people through false religion, isn't it possible than that even the Bible is a contrived misleading tool of religiousity created by deceiving men to dominate and control people - therefore, not even God inspired but a total sham?
if this is a possibility, then, wouldn't the line of reasoning lead to the foolishness of even contending for the correct position to hold concerning the 70 AD event for the Bible itself could not even be trusted as infalible?
would God allow man to burn up or, even dismiss documents that He intended to be revealed for His children to trust as His holy love letter and only hope?
.... again... thanks to all who have contributed to this post! .. most excellent and thought provoking.
i was wondering, too, concerning Presence, if there was a source that might give me a bit more info to chew on.. their website is kinda vague.. at best.. lol. the universalism doctrine declared in the post isn't obvious in any of the material ive discovered... although, the absence of the cross in any of the so far viewed material is.
God speed! .. jef
 
Upvote 0

Hidden Manna

Veteran
Feb 21, 2004
1,206
11
69
✟16,418.00
Faith
Christian
yeshuasavedme said:
He is still about to come, hidden Manna. Very, very soon!
-in maybe just five minutes, only those ready will be taken out before He judges the inhabitants of the world and sets up His earthly kingdom.
When He comes, there will not be one wicked one left in the entire earth, and He will reign for a thousand eyars of Peace, for earth's Sabbath and the Last Day of it, in relation to it's beginning of days.

Is that all yeshuasavedme, just a 1000 years. What happens after that, does He then stop reigning in this non scripturaul "earthly kingdom"?

If there are no wicked left then Isaiah did not know what he was talking about in Isaiah 65:20

" No more shall an infant from there [live but a few] days, Nor an old man who has not fulfilled his days; For the child shall die one hundred years old, But the sinner [being] one hundred years old shall be accursed.

When Jesus told John He did not understand when he said that quickly would be more then 2000 years and that evil people will be around the outside of the city. But you said, there will not be one wicked one left in the entire earth when Jesus comes. Who shall we believe then you or Jesus and Isaiah?

Rev.22: 12 " And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward [is] with Me, to give to every one according to his work.13 "I am the Alpha and the Omega, [the] Beginning and [the] End, the First and the Last."14 Blessed [are] those who do His commandments, that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter through the gates into the city.15 But outside [are] dogs and sorcerers and sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters, and whoever loves and practices a lie. *

Now would you explain to us people who believe in spiritual fulfillment what kind of city did the first century saints come to here in Hebrews 12:22

But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, to an innumerable company of angels,23 to the general assembly and church of the firstborn [who are] registered in heaven, to God the Judge of all, to the spirits of just men made perfect,

And please explain why the scripture says: to the spirits of just men made perfect ?

If what you say is so about this regenerated physical body doctrine which is totally false according to scripture, how is it so in 1 Cor.15 that says first is the natural then the spiritual.

You view is first is natural, then spiritual, then physically regenerated. Show us where it says that the regenerated is physical?


1 Cor.15:42 So also [is] the resurrection of the dead. [The body] is sown in corruption, it is raised in incorruption.43 It is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory. It is sown in weakness, it is raised in power. 44 It is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.45 And so it is written, "The first man Adam became a living being." The last Adam [became] a life-giving spirit. 46 However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural, and afterward the spiritual. 47 The first man [was] of the earth, [made] of dust; the second Man [is] the Lord from heaven. 48 As [was] the [man] of dust, so also [are] those [who are made] of dust; and as [is] the heavenly [Man,] so also [are] those [who are] heavenly. 49 And as we have borne the image of the [man] of dust, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly [Man.] 50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; nor does corruption inherit incorruption.
 
Upvote 0

notswift

Member
Dec 7, 2005
8
0
67
✟22,618.00
Faith
Christian
You view is first is natural said:
of course, to try to lift up diverse passages of Scripture to make a singular point would be a major consumption of time, electronic energy, and patience. the Bible should be taken as a complete literary work, not in bits and pieces, to better understand the nature of God... no?[/i]
wouldnt the nature of our Heavenly Father be to fix what His children broke? Genesis says that God saw His creation and saw that it was good. His children messed it up... as He knew they would because He is God and He knows all things... and, maybe that is why He said it was good instead of it was perfect... which it will be if the correct interpretation is of all creation renewed, this time without sin.
wouldnt Jesus have revealed Himself on the third day in spirit only if that is what we, too, would have to look forward to? certainly, these men and women who had seen miracles performed by the Master would not have had difficulty in comprehending and accepting such a thing as an eterninty without a body.
Godspeed! jef
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hidden Manna; If what you say is so about this regenerated physical body doctrine which is totally false according to scripture, how is it so in 1 Cor.15 that says first is the natural then the spiritual.
You are speaking falsely about the doctrine of the resurrection -we are liars if the body of Jesus is not risen that He is come in human flesh in; and we have no hope if He is not risen in His same incarnated body that was 'laid' in the womb of the virgin for Him -the YHWH from heaven, second Person- to come incarnate in, as the Chief Foundation Stone of the 'second' human, house of the LORD -for the Presence of the glory to indwell.

On Corinthians; I have brought this to your attention before, but we go round the merry go round again -cause you do not believe it and keep saying it is different from what it says;


And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam [was made] a quickening spirit. Howbeit that [was] not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual. The first man [is] of the earth, earthy: the second man [is] the Lord from heaven. As [is] the earthy, such [are] they also that are earthy: and as [is] the heavenly, such [are] they also that are heavenly.

So: the Last Adam was a "quickening Spirit" in a body of human flesh, in fact: He is The "Life Giving Spirit" in humsn flesh as the last Adam; and the first Adam was made a "living soul".
Both the first Adam and the last Adam were 'made' bodies of flesh as the living soul and the quickening Spirit. the spiritual 'Man' is the New Man, a fully human being Man in a body of flesh!


First Adam is "earth [adamah] blood [dam]" of the earth, Last Adam is the Life Giving spirit; the LORD from heaven: the comparison of the first Adam and the last Adam, Hidden Manna, is what they, the core of their being, is, that is "made" flesh.
The living soul and the Life Giving Spirit are the two "Adam's' and the last one is the LORD from heaven in that flesh, as the Life Giving Spirit; the firt one is of the earth, blood, a breathing soul.
The Last One is Life, breath, Himself, and is come in human flesh; the first one is created to have 'life' in the life -but died as son of God to Life.




1Cr 15:45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam [was made] a quickening spirit.
1Cr 15:47 The first man [is] of the earth, earthy: the second man [is] the Lord from heaven.
 
Upvote 0

Hidden Manna

Veteran
Feb 21, 2004
1,206
11
69
✟16,418.00
Faith
Christian
notswift said:
You view is first is natural said:
of course, to try to lift up diverse passages of Scripture to make a singular point would be a major consumption of time, electronic energy, and patience. the Bible should be taken as a complete literary work, not in bits and pieces, to better understand the nature of God... no?[/i]
wouldnt the nature of our Heavenly Father be to fix what His children broke? Genesis says that God saw His creation and saw that it was good. His children messed it up... as He knew they would because He is God and He knows all things... and, maybe that is why He said it was good instead of it was perfect... which it will be if the correct interpretation is of all creation renewed, this time without sin.
wouldnt Jesus have revealed Himself on the third day in spirit only if that is what we, too, would have to look forward to? certainly, these men and women who had seen miracles performed by the Master would not have had difficulty in comprehending and accepting such a thing as an eterninty without a body.
Godspeed! jef


The Resurrection of Christ: Physical or Non-physical?
This discussion opens a “can of worms” doctrinally speaking, as this doctrine lies at the very core of the Christian faith, supposedly - according to Creedalists and traditionists anyway. “If you deny the PHYSICAL resurrection of Christ” (they say, authoritatively) “you deny the Christian faith, and are no more than a heretic or worse”. SO...this idea that Christ Jesus rose from the grave PHYSICALLY (which I subscribed to myself, for many years) must be examined and critiqued carefully and with the utmost care taken to evaluate the language, inferences and context associated with all texts relevant to this event.

One of the most popular passages of Scripture associated with this subject is 1Corinthians 15. Paul goes engages in a lengthy homily on the subject of the resurrection, and in actual fact - at no point in this passage does he specify that CHRIST’S resurrection was, indeed, PHYSICAL. In fact, he does the opposite. Without going through the passage verse by verse, suffice it to say that Paul clearly states (under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit) that Christ was raised a SPIRIT being.

45 And so it is written, “The first man Adam became a living being.” The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. 46 However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural, and afterward the spiritual .47 The first man was of the earth, made of dust; the second Man is the Lord from heaven. 48 As was the man of dust, so also are those who are made of dust; and as is the heavenly Man, so also are those who are heavenly. 49 And as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly Man. 50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; nor does corruption inherit incorruption. (1Cor. 15:45-50)

In the context, then, of Paul’s homily on the resurrection concept, he clearly states (above, in v.45) that Christ Jesus was made a “life-giving SPIRIT”. The argument that Christ ascended into heaven in bodily, physical form, then, is totally defeated by this statement. Paul’s subsequent statements, as highlighted above, further emphasize and reiterate the point that physical bodies ARE NOT PERMITTED entrance into God’s Presence in heaven. Those who dwell with God in the heavenlies have spirit forms, NOT physical bodies.

Christ Jesus Himself made this very clear in His defense of the resurrection to the Sadducees, in Matt. 22:30, “For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels of God in heaven .” There is no marrying or giving in marriage in “the resurrection” (the place to which the saints were resurrected, in the First Century - the heavenly Promised Land) because those who participate in it and dwell in heaven eternally ARE LIKE THE ANGELS OF GOD IN HEAVEN. They do not PROCREATE, because they are NON-PHYSICAL SPIRIT BEINGS, like the angels. We know the angels are non-physical spirit beings through the clear statements of many texts such as Heb. 1:7, “And of the angels He says: “ Who makes His angels spirits And His ministers a flame of fire.”

Christ’s tomb was empty because the angels “spirited” His physical, pre-death body away (the physical body He possessed during His earthly ministry). NO-ONE witnessed Christ walking out of the tomb and handled him physically to verify that at the moment of his exiting the tomb He possessed His previous, physical body. In actual fact, Christ rose from “the dead” (the place of the dead - Sheol) as a Living Being, in SPIRIT form. He could assume any appearance He chose, which is why the disciples on the road to Emmaus didn’t immediately recognize Him as He conversed with them, and why when they DID recognize Him, He immediately VANISHED OUT OF THEIR SIGHT (as SPIRIT BEINGS are capable to do, but which action PHYSICAL BEINGS are not capable of).

13 Now behold, two of them were traveling that same day to a village called Emmaus, which was seven miles from Jerusalem. 14 And they talked together of all these things which had happened. 15 So it was, while they conversed and reasoned, that Jesus Himself drew near and went with them. 16 But their eyes were restrained, so that they did not know Him ... 30 Now it came to pass, as He sat at the table with them, that He took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to them. 31 Then their eyes were opened and they knew Him; and He vanished from their sight. 32 And they said to one another, “Did not our heart burn within us while He talked with us on the road, and while He opened the Scriptures to us?” 33 So they rose up that very hour and returned to Jerusalem, and found the eleven and those who were with them gathered together, 34 saying, “The Lord is risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!” 35 And they told about the things that had happened on the road, and how He was known to them in the breaking of bread.

It COULD be argued that this instance of His post-resurrection appearances to His disciples was evidence of God’s hand upon THEM, in blinding them to Christ’s true identity until a specific moment in their interactions. In other words, some might argue that this anecdote doesn’t speak directly to Christ’s post-resurrection form, but to His disciples’ perceptions, as governed by God. But let us consider other texts in conjunction with the one above, to see if there is further clarification elsewhere.

40 Him God raised up on the third day, and showed Him openly, 41 not to all the people, but to witnesses chosen before by God , even to us who ate and drank with Him after He arose from the dead (Acts 10:40,41)

This Jesus who was raised from the dead was an interesting Being. He was not readily visible to just anyone alive in those days. Rather, it was necessary to SHOW Him to people (i.e. to MANIFEST Him to people). Spirit beings have always had the capacity to take on physical form for brief periods of time, MANIFESTING themselves in physical form for various reasons. We see this in God’s appearance to Abraham, where He appeared to him in the form of three men and actually LUNCHED with Abraham. We see the angel physically WRESTLING with Jacob in Genesis also, and other instances of spirit beings taking on physical characteristics and appearance for a time, to accomplish a specific purpose. I believe the bulk of the Scriptural evidence shows that Christ Jesus ALSO had this type of form.

The one text most commonly used to attempt to refute the idea that Christ’s resurrection was strictly spiritual is His appearance to Thomas and His words to Him, found in Luke 24:39, “Behold My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself. Handle Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see I have.” Christ Jesus SEEMS to be stating that He is NOT a “resurrected spirit being” here. But if we consider His actual words carefully, it becomes evident that He is inferring, or implying, that He is not a disembodied “ghost” or “deceiving spirit”, but that He WAS, in fact, the risen Lord. The whole point of these manifestations of Himself, physically, to His followers, was to confirm that His PERSON was raised from Sheol, and His spirit was NOT still imprisoned, awaiting the resurrection, like their forefathers.

Christ was concerned that His followers understand that the Person with whom they were interacting was HIM, and not just a phantom or spectre, tricking them into thinking that He had risen. A mere “spirit” of a departed person does not manifest physical qualities (not until it is resurrected and glorified, anyway) but a resurrected SPIRIT BEING (a person who has experienced resurrection) and has taken on a “heavenly form”, is essentially spirit in essence, and yet has the capacity to manifest himself physically, at will.

If Christ possessed the IDENTICAL physical body He had on the cross and before, during His earthly ministry, He would NOT have been able to pass through closed, locked doors and materialize in front of His disciples (John 20:19ff.), nor could He dematerialize in front of their eyes (like He did with the disciples on their way to Emmaus).

If Christ possessed the very same physical body that went INTO the tomb, it would not have been necessary for God to MAKE HIM VISIBLE to select witnesses to His resurrection (per the statements in Acts 10, above).
 
Upvote 0

Hidden Manna

Veteran
Feb 21, 2004
1,206
11
69
✟16,418.00
Faith
Christian
yeshuasavedme said:
So: the Last Adam was a "quickening Spirit" in a body of human flesh, in fact: He is The "Life Giving Spirit" in humsn flesh as the last Adam;


First Adam is "earth [adamah] blood [dam]" of the earth, Last Adam is the Life Giving spirit.


The living soul and the Life Giving Spirit are the two "Adam's' and the last one is the LORD from heaven in that flesh, as the Life Giving Spirit; the firt one is of the earth, blood, a breathing soul.


1Cr 15:45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam [was made] a quickening spirit.
1Cr 15:47 The first man [is] of the earth, earthy: the second man [is] the Lord from heaven.


You are writing things into scripture that are not there when it come to last[/b] Adam [was made] a quickening spirit or life giving Spirit.

The point is, is that Jesus was made a quickening spirit or life giving Spirit., not is as when He was in flesh and also a life giving Spirit. Jesus was made a life giving Spirit after He was resurrected, not when He was in the flesh before He died.




The scripture does not say was a "quickening Spirit" in a body of human flesh. You added in a body of human flesh to try to convince any reader that what you added is what Paul was saying while under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

By your adding to scripture your false view you are also taking away from the true meaning of God's word. But as long as you are backed up by the creeds of MEN then I guess according to you you are right with God. Do not count on it because God is not at all impressed with the creeds of MEN because His word will not take second place nor be judged by the creeds of MEN.



If in the begining Jesus was one with God the Father in Spirit, not flesh, then Christ became manifested in flesh. It seems very obvious that after His resurrection He then was MADE a life-giving Spirit which proved to be the case in the upper room on the Day of Pentecost.

That is when He give Himself as Spirit to all who recieved the infilling of the Holy Spirit and people were converted like Peter who then preached and won 3000 to the Lord and the Body of Christ was born and began to multiply.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
it is a lie that the preterist author you pasted the writing of, said, Hidden Manna, who denied the resurrection body of flesh that Jesus Christ is in, forever.

John says that the spirit of anti-christ denies the flesh body that Jesus Christ is in.

He 'is come in flesh', is said in the present tense in John, and that was said after He rose and ascended.
Furthermore, He is returning in His body of flesh to rule over this earth as Son of Man; which He is the Firstborn over as a human being.

Futhermore, His incarnation body of flesh was laid in the womb of the virgin as the Chief foundation stone of the New house for YHWH to glorify with the Presence of His glory; and it is a human house; named Israel, not Adam, but it is as human as the first man is.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hidden Manna said:
You are writing things into scripture that are not there when it come to last[/b] Adam [was made] a quickening spirit or life giving Spirit.

The point is, is that Jesus was made a quickening spirit or life giving Spirit., not is as when He was in flesh and also a life giving Spirit. Jesus was made a life giving Spirit after He was resurrected, not when He was in the flesh before He died.




The scripture does not say was a "quickening Spirit" in a body of human flesh. You added in a body of human flesh to try to convince any reader that what you added is true.



If in the begining Jesus was one with God the Father in Spirit, not flesh, then Christ became manifested in flesh. It seems very obvious that after His resurrection He then was MADE a life-giving Spirit which proved to be the case in the upper room on the Day of Pentecost.

That is when He give Himself as Spirit to all who recieved the infilling of the Holy Spirit and people were converted like Peter who then preached and won 3000 to the Lord and the Body of Christ was born and began to multiply.
Hidden Manna,
The first Adam was made a living soul -in a body of flesh.
The last Adam was a Life Giving Spirit -who is come in a body of flesh.
Adam was made, the Spirit of Christ existed from all eternity as YHWH of hosts, second Person who is come in fully human being flesh of the New Creation Man.
The Scripture does not say that Jesus was "made" a Life Giving Spirit and it does not say that He was 'made' 'any thing' after His resurrection -you are preterizing the passage, and it does not say that.

furthermore: YHWH is Spirit, and He exists in three Persons;
Adam is spirit, and He exists in billions of persons.
Spirit is what YHWH is; and before Him there was no God "made' neither shall there be after Him.
So the Last Adam was not made a created Spirit at any time in His incarnation or after it; as He is the Life Giving Spirit in human flesh.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.