I must have missed this! It's hard to keep track of all posts in a busy thread. Do you have a post number? This is a must-see! Nobody has succeeded before.
No you didn't miss anything. You responded by repeating your point. The explanations in posts 211 and 228 are reasonable alternative explanations for what you produced so long as one is able to divorce themselves from the undemonstrated indoctrination (assumption) of a Common Ancestor (which is imagined as one possibility, not factually known, and has been only that ever since Chuck the D first imagined the possibility).
(See Darwin pg 484 O o S, which says, "Therefore I should infer from analogy that probably all the organic beings which have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form, into which life was first breathed.")
Ever since he expressed this theoretical possibility people have clung to it as if it is a fact, but the real evidence which could demonstrate this has never been produced for scientific examination and analysis. It is to this day a primary assumption that colors interpretations made. My responses in the two afore mentioned posts can only be understood because I have learned to separate the data and the story told to explain it in light of the presupposed idea. The two must be separated for true objectivity to surface.
Last edited:
Upvote
0