- Aug 16, 2005
- 22,326
- 2,955
- 46
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Word of Faith
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
So if someone comes to me trying to convince me to get vaccinated and I ask the question "Can you guarantee and assure me I won't get any serious side effects or consequences as a result of taking it" I expect a direct answer, not the standard "serious side effects are rare but the vaccines are generally tolerated well" response, as that is not good enough for me.
The benefit/risk calculus of vaccinating a healthy teenage boy is totally different than the benefit/risk caculus of an 80-year old with multiple co-morbidities. This is what advocates of mandates miss.
Mandate advocates don't care if a second dose of vaccine puts you at higher risk of myocarditis. They also do not care if perhaps a single dose of vaccine after an infection is sufficient, rather than two doses (as has been studied and suggested). They don't care if studies show that immunity after infection is actually better than vaccine-induced immunity. They care only that you comply with the mandate of 2 shots and 2 weeks, because they say so. It is one of the least scientific approaches to a health problem ever.
I don't know why people today are so afraid to ask for questions. Are people afraid they going to be labelled as a anti-vaxx because they asking questions?
People have labeled Dr. Paul Offit an anti-vaxxer for advising caution with boosters and advising his own 20-year old son not to get boosted, even though he has actually developed vaccines and is now on the FDA advisory committee for vaccinations! That's how crazy the world has gone.
Upvote
0