Hans Blaster
Rocket surgeon
- Mar 11, 2017
- 15,032
- 12,014
- 54
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
Past experience.
For example the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum on 18th Sep 2014. There was an ICM Poll on 11 Sep which had 'Yes' 7% ahead which led to a frantic cascade of new promises and measures encouraging people to vote 'no'.
From every election you could probably find similar examples.
In your election polling they seem to throw the kitchen sink at Trump but so far he has been victorious. God Bless
This is one of the reasons people pay for polling. They want to understand the electorate and their current thinking. If it's bad for them (and it was for the "no" people in your example) they can change their tactics and expand their efforts. If they had done nothing additional, perhaps the result would have been more like the original poll. (In this case, knowing that the "YES" vote was relatively popular and had a current majority, may have convinced people who didn't want independence that they should make the effort to vote or encourage "soft yes" voters they know to change their minds.)
Whether you think "NO" or "YES" was the better choice in this case, the polling was clearly informed people about the positions of their fellow Scots and thus allowed them to make more informed decisions.
Upvote
0