don’t know, that seems to be a creationist meme. If you mean that a lot of organisms eat others well that’s they way living organisms act. Fungi and bacteria eat plants and animals and vice versa.
What is the point in believing in a fantasy
of course, that’s why we’re in Hominidae with the rest of the apesCan people be "verifiable evidence"?
of course, that’s why we’re in Hominidae with the rest of the apes
Belief doesn’t have anything to do with science. Science is based on verifiable evidence and my faith accepts mainstream science
Agreed. Actually, to be God, that is, First Cause, logically there can be nothing even concurrent with him (for example, there cannot be two First Causes, because if both were sovereign firsts, there is still the overriding principle of "two-ness", that both are subject to, and First Cause cannot be subject to anything else. First Cause is not an effect, but ONLY cause.Ah, thanks so much, I just wrote what I thought, well I was just thinking if it all started with normal life sort of that there wouldn`t be any god, but god could have been before that again of course
Only if you can demonstrate why, taxanomically, humans are not in the Hominidae.
And then you will demonstrate why, taxanomically, humans are not in the Hominidae?
Taxonomy is a scientific discipline. There is no science in your post. So, yes. It seems it was an easy one. You are unable to "demonstrate why, taxanomically, humans are not in the Hominidae". Thank you for that honest concession.Genesis 2:20
"20The man gave names to all the livestock, to the birds of the air, and to every beast of the field. But for Adam no suitable helper was found."
That's an easy one...
There is no science in your post
Irrelevant. That branch of science dealing with classification of life forms is taxonomy. The challenge I set you was to "demonstrate why, taxanomically, humans are not in the Hominidae". If, as turns out to be the case, you were unable to do so, the honest thing would have been to say so at the outset. Instead you make a series of posts that are quite irrelevant to the challenge. You waste my time, your time and that of our readers.Science is nothing more than an intellectual tool for classifying things...ummmm...the first Adam already did this...
taxanomically, humans are not in the Hominidae". If, as turns out to be the case, you were unable to do so, the honest thing would have been to say so at the outset
What point was that?I have given the reasonable explanation that Adam (the first bonafide scientist) has classified (taxonomated...that a word?) already...and he didn't call us apes or hominidaes...nor did he call those animals man...so...
Honestly...anyone can call anything what they want...which science does freely...I tend to not accept all such labels...
*But all that has been said in these last several posts, is beside the point which @Brightmoon has yet to address...
Nothing that an Episcopalian has to answer to
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?