christianmarine said:
No, but yours is not tolerant of Chrstianity either. If I were to say that homosexual acts were not supported by the Bible, that can be construed as hate speech, and I would be locked up for it. You guys have no freedom of speech, unless it's denegrating language about Christianity.
Then how do so many televangelists, right-wing preachers, and conservative politicians get away with saying that every single time I listen to the radio or watch a TV?
Obviously, given that people say that homosexual acts are sinful and that the Bible says they are wrong all the time, including in the media, nobody gets arrested for that, and it's not hate speech. What WOULD be hate speech would be saying, "The Bible says that homosexuals should be put to death. You must put homosexuals to death." That is inciting people to violence, and that is not allowed.
But if you have any evidence of anyone in the United States being arrested and charged with a hate crime for saying that homosexuality was a sin and that the Bible says it is wrong, let me know, because I'd like to see it.
--------------------------------------------------------------
As to the topic at hand, I think the problem is that "obesity" is being associated with gluttony. The two are not synonymous. Some obese people are gluttonous. Some thin people are gluttonous. My husband and I are good friends with a couple who both eat A LOT. The woman weighs about 300 pounds, and while she likes big meals, she eats quite a bit less than her boyfriend, who is very thin. I've met her mother, her aunt, and her sister, and they are all big women. I've met her boyfriend's father and brother, and they are thin people. I'm a little more than half her size, and it's not unusual for me to eat more than her at a meal.
Body sizes vary. In any population where there is adequate food, there is going to be enormous variations in body size, from those who are very thin to those who are quite large. That has nothing to do with gluttony, but with human diversity.
And, some people who fit the government's standards for "obese" are actually very fit. I remember reading a magazine article a few years back about how a number of Olympic-level U.S. athletes would be considered "obese" by medical standards, because of their weight and height. But, they are obviously not unfit or overfat, they are just over what is considered an "ideal" weight for women.
That said, obviously many obese people do eat too much and exercise too little. But, so do many normal weight people, and even many underweight people are quite out of shape. I think we've all known extremely skinny people who never work out and smoke a lot and are not at all paragons of health. To point to overweight or obese people and say that they are gluttonous is just false. Some are, some aren't. Even some extremely large people have metabolic problems and their weight is not due to gluttony, but to other issues. Or, some people are very large because they did have a problem with overeating, and their metabolism became some messed up that now they can't lose weight eating normal amounts of food.
I think that, if we are going to talk about sin, being obsessed with one's body and what one eats is as much a sin as gluttony. When people don't obsess about their weight and eat what their body (genuinely) wants, they tend to hit a weight they can maintain pretty easily, and that weight varies a lot depending on the person. Some people will do that and be thin; others will do it and be fat. But I think that in either case they are acting less sinfully in regards to food than those who spend thousands of dollars each year and obsess about food in order to maintain what is considered to be an "ideal" weight.