PS:
TurtleAnne:
Well, thanks, but I wasn't looking for compliments, really; and I think there have now also been many others on this thread who are very sympathetic to the situation you are in, don't you think? You mentioned something about becoming a primary school teacher I think; and while some boards might in theory ask for visible tattoos to be covered, I don't think it would become a serious problem; after all, any board trying to hire tattoo-less ppl only would probably find it hard to hire at all.
From the thread responses so far, it seems that, while you would instinctively have a lot of Christians' sympathy, there is also not likely to be a full consensus on such issues which inevitably involve an element of subjectivity. Frankly, it's possible that some of the vehemence which does exist among older Christian men on the subject of tattoos can hide a gender aspect not too far below the surface; while ex-military good ol'boys who are likely tattooed might be indulged, the idea of a tattooed woman is still hard for them to internalize (even though statistics show that in North America now 59%-70% or more of parlor clients are actually female). The sheer prevalence now of women in Bible Belt churches confidently getting ink - demonstrated in the quote in post #5 demonstrates - probably only serves to heighten the insecurity and anxiety of certain very conservative older men: and of course their knee-jerk reaction is likely to be to try somewhat to dent the sense of positivity of otherwise confidently tattooed Christian women. If this makes any sense?
(Okay, Ms. Anne, so I've stopped being an armchair psychologist...)