• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Seemingly Anti-OSAS Scriptures

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I see you are still ashamed of your own man made doctrine, because you won’t answer a question that truly exposes it as false.
Hey, why haven't you answered my question to you about whether you're still beating your wife?

Is there something you'd rather not admit?

Based on the teaching of ES, OSAS, If a born again Christian takes the mark of the beast and worships him, are they still saved?
As I demonstrated with my question to you, your question is just as bogus as mine was to you.

The problem with your question, just as mine to you, is that the premise is BOGUS.

As I already when I DID answer your bogus question.

I explained WHY there wouldn't be any believers alive who would take the mark.

Why don't you accept that answer? It's reasonable and rational.

You love to ask bogus false-premise questions, but it seems you're quite unwilling to answer the same kind of questions.

That's hypocritical.

Is that on your list of sins that will keep one out of heaven?
 
Upvote 0

Gr8Grace

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2018
1,411
405
52
South Dakota
✟92,024.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hey, why haven't you answered my question to you about whether you're still beating your wife?

Is there something you'd rather not admit?


As I demonstrated with my question to you, your question is just as bogus as mine was to you.

The problem with your question, just as mine to you, is that the premise is BOGUS.

As I already when I DID answer your bogus question.

I explained WHY there wouldn't be any believers alive who would take the mark.

Why don't you accept that answer? It's reasonable and rational.

You love to ask bogus false-premise questions, but it seems you're quite unwilling to answer the same kind of questions.

That's hypocritical.

Is that on your list of sins that will keep one out of heaven?
So Glad you posed that question. But rationality and objectivity went out the window long ago. Cant even have some sense of reasonable dialog!

My response question was( It's pointless, so I didn't):

If the Lord Jesus Christ took the mark of the beast, would the Lord Jesus Christ still be saved? Yes or no.

How can a rational, living without assistance, person NOT see that the question is based upon a FALSE assumption/premise?!?!? Some of this is just amazing, extraordinarily amazing, to watch. Some of this stuff is coming from people who live on their own and probably have families! How can one be so irrational yet function in society?
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
So Glad you posed that question. But rationality and objectivity went out the window long ago. Cant even have some sense of reasonable dialog!

My response question was( It's pointless, so I didn't):

If the Lord Jesus Christ took the mark of the beast, would the Lord Jesus Christ still be saved? Yes or no.

How can a rational, living without assistance, person NOT see that the question is based upon a FALSE assumption/premise?!?!? Some of this is just amazing, extraordinarily amazing, to watch. Some of this stuff is coming from people who live on their own and probably have families! How can one be so irrational yet function in society?
Good question! But then, those with agendas care not one whit about reasonable and rational ideas.

I've noticed that neither JLB or Jason haven't answered my question. ;)
 
Upvote 0

JLB777

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2012
5,905
1,258
✟448,811.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Nonsense. I answered 3 times, so apparently you never bothered reading any of them. So why would anyone think you actually will now?

What has changed? Nothing.


Got news for you. The question was bogus to the max and has already fallen FLAT on its face.

Here's a question for you:

Yes or no: have you stopped beating your wife yet?


Yeah, go ahead and answer my question so everyone will know where you stand on whether you have stopped beating your wife yet.


Yes or no: have you stopped beating your wife yet?


Sure. Now, answer my question about whether you've stopped beating your wife yet.

If you ask a legitimate question, I am always happy to answer. But I don't answer stupid bogus questions that are driven by phony assumptions, as my question to you reveal.

So, every time you ask such a stupid and bogus question, I will ask you whether you have stopped beating your wife yet.

Stupid questions beget stupid questions.

However, my response to your stupid and bogus question was both reasonable and rational.

Unlike your unreasonable and irrational question. Like my question to you about your poor wife.

I have read your post’s and none of them contain an answer to my question.

Your posts have attempted to dodge the question because your false doctrine of OSAS, can not stand the test of the truth.

Born again Christian’s who take the mark of the beast are no longer saved.


Proving that OSAS is a lie.


Based on the teaching of ES, OSAS, If a born again Christian takes the mark of the beast and worships him, are they still saved?


Yes?

or

No?


JLB
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I have read your post’s and none of them contain an answer to my question.
Well, then, you're just not looking.

However, I will answer your question again AFTER you answer my simple question:

Have you stopped beating your wife? Yes or No.

Your posts have attempted to dodge the question because your false doctrine of OSAS, can not stand the test of the truth.
Total malarky.

Born again Christian’s who take the mark of the beast are no longer saved.
False premise. Therefore, bogus question.

Proving that OSAS is a lie.
Please tell that to Jesus Christ who SAID those He gives eternal life shall never, no not ever, perish. John 10:28

Based on the teaching of ES, OSAS, If a born again Christian takes the mark of the beast and worships him, are they still saved?

Yes?
or
No?
JLB
You answer my simple question of whether you have stopped beating your wife with a simple yes or no response first, and then I WILL answer your question FOR THE THIRD TIME.
 
Upvote 0

JLB777

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2012
5,905
1,258
✟448,811.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Please tell that to Jesus Christ who SAID those He gives eternal life shall never, no not ever, perish. John 10:28


When you learn to quote the scripture it self, so all can examine what Jesus actually said, then I will answer this again for the 10th time.


Based on the teaching of ES, OSAS, If a born again Christian takes the mark of the beast and worships him, are they still saved?

Yes?
or
No?



JLB
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I said:
"Please tell that to Jesus Christ who SAID those He gives eternal life shall never, no not ever, perish. John 10:28"
When you learn to quote the scripture it self, so all can examine what Jesus actually said, then I will answer this again for the 10th time.
It's rather funny how you continue to dodge reality in what Jesus said.

I even gave you a color coded explanation of the CAUSE and EFFECT of what Jesus said about possessing (HAVING) eternal life. And you just ignored all of it. I've directly quoted that verse so many times you have absolutely NO right to make your ridiculous claims.

Here's the verse:
And I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand.

So, the red words are a statement about the CAUSE of having eternal life.
The blue words are a statement about the EFFECT of having eternal life.

What you haven't done, because you CAN'T do it, is disprove my claim about the FACT that John 10:28 is a statement about the CAUSE and EFFECT of having eternal life.

Based on the teaching of ES, OSAS, If a born again Christian takes the mark of the beast and worships him, are they still saved?

Yes?
or
No?
I'm not going to repeat myself UNTIL you answer my question to you:

Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Yes or no?
 
Upvote 0

JLB777

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2012
5,905
1,258
✟448,811.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I said:
"Please tell that to Jesus Christ who SAID those He gives eternal life shall never, no not ever, perish. John 10:28"

It's rather funny how you continue to dodge reality in what Jesus said.

I even gave you a color coded explanation of the CAUSE and EFFECT of what Jesus said about possessing (HAVING) eternal life. And you just ignored all of it. I've directly quoted that verse so many times you have absolutely NO right to make your ridiculous claims.

Here's the verse:
And I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand.

So, the red words are a statement about the CAUSE of having eternal life.
The blue words are a statement about the EFFECT of having eternal life.

What you haven't done, because you CAN'T do it, is disprove my claim about the FACT that John 10:28 is a statement about the CAUSE and EFFECT of having eternal life.


I'm not going to repeat myself UNTIL you answer my question to you:

Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Yes or no?


Yes, your claim to John 10:28 has already been refuted, since you took the half of Jesus statement and lifted it out of the context, while ignoring the condition for receiving eternal life.


  • eternal life to those who by patient continuance in doing good seek for glory, honor, and immortality; Romans 2:7



All while you dodge and refuse to answer the question.


why?


Based on the teaching of ES, OSAS, If a born again Christian takes the mark of the beast and worships him, are they still saved?

Yes?
or
No?



JLB
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Yes, your claim to John 10:28 has already been refuted, since you took the half of Jesus statement and lifted it out of the context, while ignoring the condition for receiving eternal life.
I've done no such thing, as everyone else knows. v.28 is a single statement addressing both the CAUSE and EFFECT of having eternal life. And I proved that by color coding the words, so that there can be no confusion as to what the verse means:

And I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand.

What you keep FAILING to do is refute the fact that v.28 is about the cause and effect of having eternal life.

As everyone else knows, v.27 is a description of Jesus' sheep. There are NO conditions mentioned in v.27.

eternal life to those who by patient continuance in doing good seek for glory, honor, and immortality; Romans 2:7
Still confused by this verse, I see. As everyone else knows, Paul was making the point that ONLY perfect obedience could anyone earn eternal life.

As everyone else knows, NO HUMAN BEING is able to do that. Because after writing 2:6-8 Paul THEN wrote these words in the next chapter, which you have refused to acknowledge:
9 What shall we conclude then? Do we have any advantage? Not at all! For we have already made the charge that Jews and Gentiles alike are all under the power of sin.

iow, those who are under the power of sin, which includes "all of us", cannot "by patient continuance in doing good" earn eternal life.

10 As it is written: “There is no one righteous, not even one;

More evidence that no human being is capable of continuance in doing good.

12 All have turned away, they have together become worthless; there is no one who does good, not even one.”

20 Therefore no one will be declared righteous in God’s sight by the works of the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of our sin.
23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,

You mention "refute" yet these very verses have totally refuted your very unbiblical views.

All while you dodge and refuse to answer the question.
Total LIE. I've answered it thrice.

No, the question is why do you continue to LIE? And ignore my question to you?

Based on the teaching of ES, OSAS, If a born again Christian takes the mark of the beast and worships him, are they still saved?

Yes?
or
No?
As I've already explained, I'll answer your bogus question AGAIN (4th time) but ONLY AFTER you answer my question to you:

Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Yes or no?

I have demonstrated by my question how your question is bogus and illegitimate by being based in a false premise.

Whether you actually do beat your wife isn't my point. But my question ASSUMES that you do, to demonstrate a false premise.

And your question ASSUMES there will be believers who do take the mark of the beast.

How come you can't figure out that if that ever does happen, then what Jesus said in John 10:28 becomes a total lie.

Jesus, who is omniscient, and already knows that no believer will take the mark, would have had to say this, if any believer would take the mark:

I give them eternal life, and IF they don't take the mark of the beast, they shall never perish.

Or this:

I give them eternal life, and AS LONG AS they don't take the mark of the beast, they shall never perish.

But everyone knows exactly what Jesus said in v.28. There are no conditions for never perishing except receiving the gift of eternal life.

So, once the gift of eternal life is received, the recipient of that gift SHALL NEVER PERISH.

Your views are in direct opposition to the Savior's words. How does that make you feel?

How come the Holy Spirit hasn't convicted you of that yet? Or have you just shrugged it all off and, as Steven told the Sanhedrin, keep resisting the Holy Spirit?
 
Upvote 0

JLB777

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2012
5,905
1,258
✟448,811.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I've done no such thing, as everyone else knows. v.28 is a single statement addressing both the CAUSE and EFFECT of having eternal life. And I proved that by color coding the words, so that there can be no confusion as to what the verse means:

And I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand.

What you keep FAILING to do is refute the fact that v.28 is about the cause and effect of having eternal life.

As everyone else knows, v.27 is a description of Jesus' sheep. There are NO conditions mentioned in v.27.


Again no quote of verse 27. Why?


As I've already explained, I'll answer your bogus question AGAIN (4th time) but ONLY AFTER you answer my question to you:

Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Yes or no?


Answer: I don't beat my wife.


Which has nothing to do with the question of OSAS.


Based on the teaching of ES, OSAS, If a born again Christian takes the mark of the beast and worships him, are they still saved?

Yes?
or
No?



JLB
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Again no quote of verse 27. Why?
Not necessary, obviously. v.27 is a description of Jesus' sheep, not a condition for never perishing. Jesus addressed that in the next verse.

Answer: I don't beat my wife.
Please follow the instructions. The question was a "yes" or "no" question. Your answer doesn't answer with either choice.

I didn't ask if you beat your wife. I asked if you have stopped beating your wife yet. So your so-called answer is to a different question, not the question I posed to you.

Which has nothing to do with the question of OSAS.
Do you really not grasp the concept of what a bogus question is? Just as your question to me was bogus, obviously my question to you was just as bogus.

The problem with your and my questions is with a FALSE PREMISE. Do you understand what that means? It seems not.

Based on the teaching of ES, OSAS, If a born again Christian takes the mark of the beast and worships him, are they still saved?

Yes?
or
No?
Have you stopped beating your wife yet? yes or no. Easy question.

However, I will anwer your question in the SAME WAY as you answered mine.

No believer will ever take the mark of the beast.

Your "if" premise is false on its face.

Why can't you see that IF any of Jesus' sheep did take the mark of the beast, and perish, then what Jesus said in v.28 would be a LIE. Is that what you're trying to prove, that Jesus lied in v.28?

What is clear about v.28 is that those who are given eternal life shall never perish, but it seems you're darned determined to somehow prove that some who have been given eternal life CAN and WILL perish.

What motivates a professing Chrstian to try to prove Jesus a liar?

I can't imagine.

One thing I know: everyone who is given the free gift of eternal life by Jesus SHALL NEVER PERISH. No, not ever.
 
Upvote 0

JLB777

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2012
5,905
1,258
✟448,811.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Not necessary, obviously. v.27 is a description of Jesus' sheep, not a condition for never perishing. Jesus addressed that in the next verse.


Please follow the instructions. The question was a "yes" or "no" question. Your answer doesn't answer with either choice.

I didn't ask if you beat your wife. I asked if you have stopped beating your wife yet. So your so-called answer is to a different question, not the question I posed to you.


Do you really not grasp the concept of what a bogus question is? Just as your question to me was bogus, obviously my question to you was just as bogus.

The problem with your and my questions is with a FALSE PREMISE. Do you understand what that means? It seems not.


Have you stopped beating your wife yet? yes or no. Easy question.

However, I will anwer your question in the SAME WAY as you answered mine.

No believer will ever take the mark of the beast.

Your "if" premise is false on its face.

Why can't you see that IF any of Jesus' sheep did take the mark of the beast, and perish, then what Jesus said in v.28 would be a LIE. Is that what you're trying to prove, that Jesus lied in v.28?

What is clear about v.28 is that those who are given eternal life shall never perish, but it seems you're darned determined to somehow prove that some who have been given eternal life CAN and WILL perish.

What motivates a professing Chrstian to try to prove Jesus a liar?

I can't imagine.

One thing I know: everyone who is given the free gift of eternal life by Jesus SHALL NEVER PERISH. No, not ever.

Based on the teaching of ES, OSAS, If a born again Christian takes the mark of the beast and worships him, are they still saved?

Yes?
or
No?



JLB
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Based on the teaching of ES, OSAS, If a born again Christian takes the mark of the beast and worships him, are they still saved?

Yes?
or
No?



JLB
You're not really serious about having an adult discussion, are you?

If you were, you'd have at least acknowledged and addressed my points. But flat out ignoring them and mindlessly repeating your question that is bogus at the start is no way to foster an adult discussion.

When you admit that your question is as bogus as mine was to you, THEN we can discuss reality.
 
Upvote 0

JLB777

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2012
5,905
1,258
✟448,811.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You're not really serious about having an adult discussion, are you?

If you were, you'd have at least acknowledged and addressed my points. But flat out ignoring them and mindlessly repeating your question that is bogus at the start is no way to foster an adult discussion.

When you admit that your question is as bogus as mine was to you, THEN we can discuss reality.


I’m serious about getting a strait forward yes or no answer from you.

It’s real simple.

I will demonstrate for you.

No!

A born again Christian who takes the mark of the beast, is no longer saved and will have their part in the lake of fire.


Here you try.


If a born again Christian takes the mark of the beast and worships him, are they still saved?

Yes?
or
No?



JLB
 
Upvote 0

JLB777

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2012
5,905
1,258
✟448,811.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Did you just recently quit beating her? YES or NO.

Just looking for a straight forward answer.

I will help.

Yes.

See, it's easy.


I’m glad you were able to confess your sin of beating your wife.

Hopefully you will never do it again.


Now concerning your doctrine of OSAS,



If a born again Christian takes the mark of the beast and worships him, are they still saved?

Yes?
or
No?



JLB
 
Upvote 0

Gr8Grace

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2018
1,411
405
52
South Dakota
✟92,024.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Now concerning your doctrine of OSAS,

Concerning 'my'/the bibles doctrine of eternal security.

A believer cannot take the mark of the beast. So you will not get a 'yes' or 'no' answer from me.

Like you can't answer 'yes' or 'no' to," Have you stopped beating your wife yet?"

You never have beaten your wife. A believer never will take the mark.

This is according to my beliefs on the bibles clear teaching of eternal security.
 
Upvote 0

JLB777

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2012
5,905
1,258
✟448,811.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Concerning 'my'/the bibles doctrine of eternal security.

A believer cannot take the mark of the beast. So you will not get a 'yes' or 'no' answer from me.

Like you can't answer 'yes' or 'no' to," Have you stopped beating your wife yet?"

You never have beaten your wife. A believer never will take the mark.

This is according to my beliefs on the bibles clear teaching of eternal security.


Here is what is clear -

  • If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand


9 Then a third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand, 10 he himself shall also drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out full strength into the cup of His indignation. He shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. 11 And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; and they have no rest day or night, who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name.”

12 Here is the patience of the saints; here are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus. Revelation 14:9-12




JLB
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I’m serious about getting a strait forward yes or no answer from you.
No, you're not. You ALWAYS avoid dealing with any of my points.

It’s real simple.
Apparently not for you to answer my question, which is an excellent example of your question to me.

I will demonstrate for you.

No!
A born again Christian who takes the mark of the beast, is no longer saved and will have their part in the lake of fire.


Here you try.
Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Simple answer: yes or no.

How come you are so persistent to try to prove that Jesus Christ LIED when He said that recipients of eternal life shall never perish?

Your ridiculous answer assumes believers will take the mark. But if that were true, then Jesus would have LIED.

Would that make you happy?
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,731
USA
✟184,857.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
JLB777 said:
Answer: I don't beat my wife.
Did you just recently quit beating her? YES or NO.

Just looking for a straight forward answer.

I will help.

Yes.

See, it's easy.
Maybe the answer is really "no", which is why he won't answer the question. ;)
 
Upvote 0