A Brother In Christ
Senior Veteran
Is Ben Johnson Ignoring me on the scripture he requested ....
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, he's "burning six candles" at the same time. Too many irons in the fire, too many horses to corral, too many doggies to rope. Sorry to be slow...Is Ben Johnson Ignoring me on the scripture he requested ....
I don't fail to realize this. Why would you make such a combative statement? What does this say about what you've failed to realize?What you fail to realize is that God doesn't make arbitrary choices. He always bases His choice upon something. If you believe He chose you, what reason might He have had?
I don't fail to realize this. Why would you make such a combative statement? What does this say about what you've failed to realize?
EXCUSE ME! Where is the combativeness in my reply??
God bases His choice here on something other than me. He bases it on His mercy. He bases it on what He wants to do, and who He wants to relate with.
And I declare that reasons are why He does anything.
God does not base His choice on what I want, nor does He base His choice on how well I do in life.
Where do I imply that?? However, "I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne." Revelation 3:20-21 (KJV)
Now what were you saying?
He's said as much in Romans 9.
Once God chooses, that choice, once enacted, has a massive effect on those chosen. But the basis of that choice is not me. How could it be? Everything is a result of Him. The basis of that choice has to be Him.
Why then does He search men's hearts, so called "fallen" ones, at that?
How is one saved?
1 Cor. 15: "1Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Is that salvation secure (OSAS)?
Ephesians 1:13 " In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of you salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
14 Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of His glory."
Because most churches are filled with false converts it looks like so called christians are falling away left and right.Can they stop believing? Can they turn away?
Because most churches are filled with false converts it looks like so called christians are falling away left and right.
Jesus says not one of His will be lost.
This is why we have nothing to boast about, because it's all Him and none of us.
If a person repents and puts their trust in Yeshua it's because Yaveh drew that person to the Son, and chose that person before the earth was even created.
Joh 17:9I am asking on their behalf. I am not asking on behalf of the world, but on behalf of those you gave me, for they are yours.
Joh 17:10All that is mine is yours, and what is yours is mine, and I have been glorified in them.
Joh 17:11I am no longer in the world, but they are in the world, and I am coming to you. Holy Father, protect them by your name, the name that you gave me, so that they may be one, as we are one.
Joh 17:12While I was with them, I protected them by your name that you gave me. I guarded them, and not one of them became lost except the one who was destined for destruction, so that the Scripture might be fulfilled.
"What you fail to realize" is a combative statement. It's also a minimizing, deprecating statement that has no meaning other than "I think you may've missed something (but I'm not sure)." But instead you've concluded that I've neglected something that is to be treated as a failure on my part.EXCUSE ME! Where is the combativeness in my reply??
But not external reasons.And I declare that reasons are why He does anything.
Did this person open the door because he wanted to, absent God's prior choice? Or was it because of God's prior choice?Where do I imply that?? However, "I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne." Revelation 3:20-21 (KJV)God does not base His choice on what I want, nor does He base His choice on how well I do in life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormly![]()
Quote:
God does not base His choice on what I want, nor does He base His choice on how well I do in life.
Where do I imply that?? However, "I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne." Revelation 3:20-21 (KJV)
Did this person open the door because he wanted to, absent God's prior choice? Or was it because of God's prior choice?
"Now what were you saying?"
Are you having a conversation with yourself?
No.That's a declaration by you, isn't it?
Nope, I didn't overlook it, and you have intentionally not corrected your method of confrontational expression when confronted with it. "Therefore your sin remains."What "you fail to realize" is that they are external reasons; attributable to man's own faith and being able to do righteously.
Lessee, quotations from the OT.You overlook those in that class of people found throughout the OT? That is failure in anyone's book.
It's interesting to me that people cite this as an evangelistic verse. It's not. What's its context? It's in the context of those Jesus loves, reproves, and disciplines. This is disciplinary. It's in a letter to a church, a church in Jesus' presence in heaven.Gods presents His 'universal' Grace; the overflow of His Nature.. The one behind the door believed what he saw and heard. He responded from himself. That is why the door handle is on his side of the door. "Whosever hears my voice, and opens the door, I will come in." . . Jesus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormly
That's a declaration by you, isn't it?
No.
So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills. Rom 9:18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormly
What "you fail to realize" is that they are external reasons; attributable to man's own faith and being able to do righteously.
Nope, I didn't overlook it, and you have intentionally not corrected your method of confrontational expression when confronted with it. "Therefore your sin remains."
I processed it through Scripture, which says:
it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy. Rom 9:16
One would think, if God were looking at something coming from the human will like faith, that Paul wouldn't say "it doesn't depend on human will ... but on God who has mercy." That would mean Paul was contradicting what God was actually doing.
You will say to me then, "Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?" Rom 9:19
There's no reason to pose this question in your view. But Paul expects the question to confront his view. Your view is therefore not the view expressed by Paul.
Will what is molded say to its molder, "Why have you made me like this?" Rom 9:20
No reason for Paul to answer this way if he had your theology, it would be simpler to say, "they are external reasons; attributable to man's own faith and being able to do righteously."
Paul doesn't answer this way. Neither will I. Why would you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormly
You overlook those in that class of people found throughout the OT? That is failure in anyone's book.
Lessee, quotations from the OT.
"None is righteous, no, not one;
no one understands;
no one seeks for God.
All have turned aside; together they have become worthless;
no one does good,
not even one."
"Their throat is an open grave;
they use their tongues to deceive."
"The venom of asps is under their lips."
"Their mouth is full of curses and bitterness."
"Their feet are swift to shed blood;
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormly
Gods presents His 'universal' Grace; the overflow of His Nature.. The one behind the door believed what he saw and heard. He responded from himself. That is why the door handle is on his side of the door. "Whosever hears my voice, and opens the door, I will come in." . . Jesus
It's interesting to me that people cite this as an evangelistic verse. It's not. What's its context? It's in the context of those Jesus loves, reproves, and disciplines. This is disciplinary. It's in a letter to a church, a church in Jesus' presence in heaven.
But then, look at the context. If this response is wholly of the person answering, then the "conquering" the person does is wholly of the person conquering. But that's absurd. We don't conquer the world without Christ's help.
And third, check the context. If this person hears, then this person has acquired spiritual hearing without the help of the Spirit.
Yet John also wrote in John 3 that those who are spiritual are born of the Spirit.
Jesus answered, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." Jn 3:5-6
If this is all you mean, that the person answering the door is already born of the Spirit, it would be no matter.
Yet it isn't.
These are spiritual absolutes, A_Brother.
There are at least a dozen .
condensed to to many characters
...and if I ever have, then to ask forgiveness.
The second group, was named: Sarah, Abraham, Isaac, Moses, Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, Samuel and the prophets.
You've never explained to me --- how if "salvation is by grace through faith", how then can someone be "faithlessly saved"?
Gal5:21 says "They that do these things, shall not inherit the kingdom of God."
How do
Do you believe He does?
Or, do you believe one can be saved without being indwelt by the Spirit?
Do you accept that "practice-sin", is opposite to "repent"?
And He is also JUST. He would be unjust to reward with eternal life, those who practice sin.
That's the point, "A_Believer". We either walk in sin (and be unsaved), OR walk in His righteousness, in Him (saved).
Always a choice...
If they believe, they are no longer ungodly.
If they are ungodly, then they do not believe.
What do you think of Jesus' words in Matt7, "You will KNOW them by their fruits? No good tree (saved) produces bad fruit (walks in sin), no bad tree (unsaved) produces good fruit (righteousness)."
"Sleeping", means "willfully sinning". You admit that; but you do not accept that cannot be "saved".
"WERE", my friend; past tense.
"If any man be IN CHRIST (saved!), he is a new creation; the old has passed away (sinful ways), behold all has become new." 2Cor5:17
If a man is not "become new", then he is not "in Christ", not saved.
Not if they fail to "flee fornication"...
If "unbelief is saved", then how can anyone perish?
He's 100% right; the guarantee, is based on our continuing in faith. Stated clearly in Col1:21-23, and many other places.
You cite Eph1:13 --- do you accept that very verse, explicitly states "AFTER believing"?
This is an excellent, and eloquently stated post; fully Scriptural (with citations!).
The only thing I might add, is a thought about "assurance".
In 1Jn5:11-13, we are told that "we can KNOW we (who HAVE Jesus), have eternal life".
So I would mildly disagree with the statement, "we cannot be infallibly sure of our salvation". We can. It is based on HIM, and not on US.
It is as Paul wrote to Timothy, 2:1:14-16: I know whom I have believed, and am confident that He can guard that which I have entrusted to Him. ...Now, guard, by the Holy Spirit who indwells us, the treasure entrusted to you."
We entrust (our faith), He guards; He entrusts (eternal life), we guard.
Fully a two-way-street.
Excellent posts.
![]()
What does this mean? ABIC is asserting a kind of "Antinomianism", that men can be actively fornicating/drunk/carousing, but still saved.
He has some verses that he thinks overturn passages like 1Cor6:9-11, Eph5:5-6, Gal5:19-21, and 1Jn3:5-10. If you agree that "he has me pinned", then you agree that someone can be actively practicing sin, but still saved.
I don't think you agree with that.
I think we're not making progress. Perhaps we can discuss Romans6 --- beginning with verse 1.
"Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? Never! How shall we who have DIED to sin, still live IN it?" Then he continues discussing how we are slaves --- either to sin, or to righteousness and God.
Let's discuss how you perceive a "middle-ground", slaves to sin but still saved.
What is the difference between someone who walks in sin (slaves to sin) but is saved, and someone who walks in sin but is NOT saved. I expect you to say "the saved one, believes." Yet --- James says, in 2:17, "Faith, if it produces no good works, is dead, being by itself." This follows verse 14, "That faith (that does not even help a brother/sister in need", can NOT save you, CAN it!"
(The "me-dunamai" construct in verse 14, is a statement; a "negative question that expects ONLY an answer of 'no'.")
Aligning this with what Jesus said in Matt7:17-20, we will be known by our fruits; either good fruits, or bad. Can you explain how "bad-fruited-people", can still be considered "saved"?
Jesus' allegory speaks of "producing good fruit, and producing bad fruit" --- no good tree (saved), produces bad fruit (sinful living).
Those passages oppose what you've been saying --- "faith, is accompanied by works (good deeds)".
No, not exactly --- let's visit what you said about one passage, Eph5;5-6.
Because if they DO, they will no longer be "saints".
Now, please read verses 5-10. Verse 5 is often mis-translated, "Add to your faith" --- that is not what he wrote. It says, "SUPPLY IN your faith" (and then lists godly qualities). These qualities are not optional --- for he says "He who LACKS these qualities is blind/short-sighted, having FORGOTTEN former purification of sins". The clearly stated principle, is that we are admonished to be diligent in regard to our calling and election, that we not be "stumbled/become-wretched", that the gates of Heaven BE provided to us."
Come now, ABIC --- it lists specific traits that conflict "saved". Same as 1Cor6:9-11, and Gal5:19-21. You have not explained how people who have the listed crimes, get exempt from the clearly stated words of "SHALL NOT INHERIT".
David repented. Do you accept that "repent", means "turn from practicing sin"?
That's exactly the point, A_Brother. Those who practice righteousness, belong to God --- "faith", is inseparable from "righteous".
And those who practice sin, belong to satan; "unrighteousness", is inseparable from "unbelief".
ABIC, you know how to tell when Ben is refuted? He stops responding.
No, he's "burning six candles" at the same time. Too many irons in the fire, too many horses to corral, too many doggies to rope. Sorry to be slow...
I've got my bottle of tomato sauce, I'll try to ketchup this weekend...
![]()
Well, how far are you willing to go against Scripture's view of God?And His will is never that He would make a righteous person unrighteous/wicked for His Glory. That is not the way of a loving God, is it?
I did -- note the rest of the posting.It’s good enough for me, look in your own eye. If you didn’t overlook it then address it instead of ignoring it.
Scripture actually contradicted this addition of yours:. . . . upon those who are merciful.
But that action doesn't influence God's choosing people:Faith doesn’t come from the human will, acting upon it, does.
Do you believe that faith doesn't involve the human will? That you can believe without wanting to believe?It isn’t will but faith we speak of. You don’t seem to make those distinctions very well when referring to Paul.
It is what Paul is speaking of.You alone are addressing what Paul is speaking of and doing a poor job of explaining him. It is not what he is even speaking of.
Because I tend not to learn falsehoods. Paul's explicit. Paul explicitly stated why he quoted it. And you're saying I need to learn it from the Psalmist's context?Why don’t you learn that that is all ripped from their moorings.
The Psalms are easy. The generation of the righteous are largely accompanied by pleas admitting that the current generation is not receiving the treatment of the generation of the righteous. Could it be that the generation needs repentance?Check out David in Ps 14 and 53 and see why he penned it that way and then, hopefully, you will understand why Paul referrenced it, and then be able to explain those who were righteous that God honored by choosing them.
Aw, I'm sorry to upset your simple understanding.What is interesting is that you are purposely warping a very simple understanding of the gospel. You willfully ignore the scripture referenced, spoken by Jesus just to protect your religious bent. I don’t get it. What do you think you are gaining.
It was your reasoning. If the reasoning doesn't fit, you must acquit ... and what you're acquitting is my argument.And conquering!!!??? What in the world are talking about?? Boy whatta stretch to make fit what you can’t!
Nope. Hopefully he was hearing the knock; God gave man hearing from creation. He expects him to use it. His willingness depends upon his needLike the woman with the issue of blood.
Undemonstrated. Lack of support. My argument stands. Jesus is writing to a church in His presence. Those Jesus is visiting are in the church in His presence.Yeah, he is referring to those already born again. The man behind the door, wasn’t.