Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes it does and we see a great example in 1 Cor 7:19 where circumcision "does not matter" but "keeping the Commandments of God" does. All major Christian denominations admit to this Bible detail as already shown.
I assume you mean "can we damage our bodies and can we eat rats with God no longer caring about such things?"..
Answer: "no" according to scripture.
The key biblical passage that refutes the "two gospel" doctrine of men is Gal 1:6-9 and Gal 3:8 "the Gospel was preached to Abraham" so then one Gospel in both OT and NT and the New Covenant is it.
Heb 8 says "New Covenant" -
A New Covenant
7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion sought for a second. 8 For finding fault with them, He says,
“Behold, days are coming, says the Lord,
When I will effect a new covenant
With the house of Israel and with the house of Judah;
9 Not like the covenant which I made with their fathers
On the day when I took them by the hand
To lead them out of the land of Egypt;
For they did not continue in My covenant,
And I did not care for them, says the Lord.
10 “For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel
After those days, says the Lord:
I will put My laws into their minds,
And I will write them on their hearts.
And I will be their God,
And they shall be My people.
11 “And they shall not teach everyone his fellow citizen,
And everyone his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’
For all will know Me,
From the least to the greatest of them.
12 “For I will be merciful to their iniquities,
And I will remember their sins no more.”
13 When He said, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. But whatever is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to disappear.
2 Cor 3
14 But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ.
There is no place in the NT where you find "do not take God's name in vain" -- and in the Word of God - such games mean nothing.
I don't know that, because God says because the Hebrews hearts were cold and far from Him is why He needed a New Covenant.False.
1. The New Covenant is in the Old Testament. Jer 31:31-33 and everyone Christ spoke to in Matt 22 knew it.
2. Jesus said "ALL the LAW and the prophets" in Matt 22 - which includes Jeremiah ... and everyone in Matt 22 knew it.
3. "The LAW and the Prophets" is a reference to "known scripture" in Matt 22 -- and everyone in Matt 22 knew it.
4. "Love God with all your heart and soul" Deut 6:5 is SCRIPTURE known to everyone in Matt 22 and we all know it.
5. "Love your neighbor as yourself" Lev 19:18 is SCRIPTURE known to everyone in Matt 22 and we all know it.
Christ was appealing to two of the Mosaic Laws - and telling the Bible scholars that were questioning him that on these two depended all of scripture - and they all knew it.
Hello Bob.Did that happen in "real life" with a quote of someone other than "you" to claim it??
If so , would it be too much trouble to ask you to post it???
Hello Bob.
You also abolished nearly the entire law yourself.
You abolished sacrificial law, offering laws, civil laws, health laws, food laws.
You abolished temple law, priesthood law, all manner of moral law, e.t.c.
Unless of course you still conduct sacrifices, obey civil law, enforce the health laws.
Ensure that offerings are within the requirements of the law.
Do you follow the law or have you abolished the law?
Hello Hark.
...
You abolished sacrificial law, offering laws, civil laws, health laws, food laws.
You abolished temple law, priesthood law, all manner of moral law, e.t.c.
Nothing about abolishing the law, you must be kidding.
Hello Bob.
You also abolished nearly the entire law yourself.
You abolished sacrificial law, offering laws, civil laws, health laws, food laws.
You abolished temple law, priesthood law, all manner of moral law, e.t.c.
You told me once that "do not take God's name in vain" is the only commandment not repeated in the NT
True ... and you told me that this does not matter to you because of course - it does not mean a thing to you ... and obviously it is not a legit reason for trashing any part of God's Word.
Hello 1stcenturylady.David, SDA's keep health laws and the Ten Commandments which are moral laws. I don't understand your post, unless you were being ironic (that he believes one thing, and uses scriptures that say the opposite, i.e #35). However, I haven't been following your conversation with Bob. Sometimes he posts scriptures that you and I interpret differently than he does. It all boils down to the purpose of the indwelling Holy Spirit which he doesn't understand.
Hello Bob.Did that happen in "real life" with a quote of someone other than "you" to claim it??
If so , would it be too much trouble to ask you to post it???
(And so sticking with the pattern of "quoting nothing" for your false accusation you then post this)
Just not in real life.... thus you quote "nothing but you" again.
Is this a form of creative writing for you??
Hello Bob.
So do you follow the law or not?
That passage in Romans is not comparing saved to lost, but comparing Spirit led believers to carnal believers.Sounds like you have not read Romans 8:4-10 yet... Paul says it is only the "lost" the "do not submit to the LAW of God neither indeed CAN they"--
And I believe you may have already agreed that the saints should not be taking God's name in vain or dishonoring parents.
so I will stick with the Bible on this one.
Hello Bob.
So do you follow the law or not?
That passage in Romans is not comparing saved to lost, but comparing Spirit led believers to carnal believers.
Hello 1stcenturylady.
There are so many laws given in the law of Moses.
Were the people Paul called saints not Spirit-filled believers?The idea that the Gospel is that the saved person is hostile toward God, is not Christ's at all, is devoid of the Spirit... is in fact "another Gospel" entirely.
Sounds like you have not read Romans 8:4-10 yet... Paul says it is only the "lost" the "do not submit to the LAW of God neither indeed CAN they"--
And I believe you may have already agreed that the saints should not be taking God's name in vain or dishonoring parents.
so I will stick with the Bible on this one.
Same thing. And a bit self-conflicted to say it since the saved are the spirit filled that belong to Christ and the carnal are the lost -- those who are not Christ's at all according to Romans 8.
Rom 8
4 so that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. 5 For those who are according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who are according to the Spirit, the things of the Spirit. 6 For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace, 7 because the mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the law of God, for it is not even able to do so, 8 and those who are in the flesh cannot please God.9 However, you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. But if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Him.
The point remains.
Hello Bob.And 1050 commands in the NT to go with the 640 in the OT
And 1050 commands in the NT to go with the 640 in the OT
Laws do you say? What laws?I will put My laws in their minds,
and inscribe them on their hearts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?