How clueless can you get?

[JustOneWay]

God did not want the people of Israel to have a king and I stand with him.

America does not have a king. Your comment was a non starter.

Do you want to discuss politics, or was your intention just to come here to insult those who do discuss politics?

 

[tulc]

because so many people accept them as legit- that is why they exist. God is going to get me banned but micaiah was not a respecter of persons.

About the bolded portion? I've been on CF a very long time and I've never seen anyone "get banned because of God".
tulc(is just sayn')

 

[pat34lee]

That's a very Christian comment. Get your mind in the right place and flee from sin.

We have no excuse to ignore reality. Bill is a serial fornicator,
if not rapist, and Hillary is his enabler and clean up gal.

 

[tulc]

We have no excuse to ignore reality. Bill is a serial fornicator,
if not rapist, and Hillary is his enabler and clean up gal.

So...you're thinking it's the Republicans turn to get their serial fornicator in the White House for 4 years? Do you think they'll use that as a slogan in the campaign? "Make America Fornicate Again!"
tulc(is just wondering)

 

[VanillaSunflowers]

Just days after emails were released indicating the DNC tipped the scales in favor of Clinton over Sanders forcing the Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to step down Hillary hires her as the "honorary" Chairwoman of her presidential campaign.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/c...norary-chair-of-campaign-team/article/2597520

The DNC crapped all over Sanders supporters by favoring Clinton; now Hillary provides another slap in the face to Bernie's supporters by making Schultz Honorary Chairwoman of her campaign.
She must really want Bernie supporters to vote for someone else.
You can't make this stuff up.

What perks does the office of honorary chairwoman afford DWS? Maybe it is Hillary's way of saying thank you.

Wouldn't that be a violation of ethics rules on the part of Debbie Wasserman Schultz? And all involved if this email information concerning the plot to rig the Sanders nomination against him is true? Isn't that illegal? Sanders wasn't the only Democrat up and running against Mrs.Clinton.
He was the last hold out though. If all this is true I'd think someone could face charges.

 

[civilwarbuff]

What perks does the office of honorary chairwoman afford DWS? Maybe it is Hillary's way of saying thank you.

For putting her finger on the scales?.....most likely....

No charges, it is all politics....

Wouldn't that be a violation of ethics rules on the part of Debbie Wasserman Schultz? And all involved if this email information concerning the plot to rig the Sanders nomination against him is true? Isn't that illegal? Sanders wasn't the only Democrat up and running against Mrs.Clinton.
He was the last hold out though. If all this is true I'd think someone could face charges.

 

[pat34lee]

So...you're thinking it's the Republicans turn to get their serial fornicator in the White House for 4 years? Do you think they'll use that as a slogan in the campaign? "Make America Fornicate Again!"
tulc(is just wondering)

Do you have proof that Trump ever cheated on his
wife, much less raped a woman? Or do you just
throw mud and see what sticks?

 

[tulc]

Do you have proof that Trump ever cheated on his
wife, much less raped a woman? Or do you just
throw mud and see what sticks?

well there's this:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...en-adultery-objectification-article-1.2604073

Donald preaches in every speech, including the one announcing his presidential bid, about his devotion to the Second Amendment.

But it’s the Fifth Amendment that was his favorite when he was deposed in the divorce with Ivana, invoked 97 times to be exact, and mostly in response to questions about “other women.”

After meeting Marla at a tennis tournament, he started flirting with her at a Manhattan church, Marble Collegiate. That’s where he eventually married her, the great passion that blew up his family, but he waited for two years after his divorce, and even for two months after she gave birth to their daughter.

the whole article is interesting.
or this one:
http://www.pensitoreview.com/2015/0...ed-nude-is-this-the-end-of-gop-family-values/

Now that we have a Republican frontrunner who is an infamous serial adulterer and whose current wife once posed nude for a magazine in his private jet, can we say that the GOP’s 35-year masquerade as the party of “family values” is officially over?

Imagine for a moment that photos had emerged of a wife of a past Republican frontrunner — Ann Romney or Cindy McCain, for example — supine on a fur rug in the altogether. Their husbands’ campaigns would have been over faster than Rick Perry could say “Oops.” But this is Teflon Don, so even evangelicals are apparently okay with what they’d otherwise consider a sinful display.

And then there is the candidate himself. Just 14 years after impeaching Pres. Clinton over a sex lie in civil lawsuit, the Republicans are now giving majority support to a notorious philanderer who openly carried on an affair with wife number two while still married to wife number one, and may have started seeing number three (the one who posed nude) while still married to number two.

If you'd like to know more I can post a few more. They aren't hard to find.
tulc(it's no trouble)

 

[tulc]

Oh! this one was also interesting:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/01/27/christians-cringe-at-donald-trump-s-sexy-past.html

Some Evangelical leaders hope Trump’s moral character will get a little more attention in the coming days. When it comes to the mogul, there’s a ton of material to work with—and attacks like these have worked before. Allegations of sexual harassment tanked Herman Cain’s insurgent-style campaign, and a scurrilous (and untrue) whisper campaign about an affair likely played a role in John McCain’s loss to George W. Bush in 2000. The fact that Ronald Reagan got divorced even once gave many conservative primary voters pause when he first telegraphed his presidential ambitions. And to this day, most Republican presidential contenders act like caucus-goers are voting for the winner of a Bible verse memorization contest.

tulc(they just seem to pop up everywhere now)

 

[Uncle Siggy]

But Hillary is very high ranking and influential in her party. To become the nominee for president and knowing all this is a clear indication of her elite status in government.

And how desperate that particular party and their supporters are...

 

[tulc]

And how desperate that particular party and their supporters are...

The Republicans you mean? I understand, Democrats have a candidate who, for all her faults, is someone who can do the job of being the President , of leading this country. The Republicans have...Mr.Trump. Of the two major Parties in the US? Only one of them looks very close to becoming a foot note in history. I'll give you a hint which one that is: it starts with an "R" and ends with an "n".
tulc(gives those who want to guess 3 chances to figure out which one it is, first two don't count)

 

[civilwarbuff]

Let's stay on topic

Just days after emails were released indicating the DNC tipped the scales in favor of Clinton over Sanders forcing the Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to step down Hillary hires her as the "honorary" Chairwoman of her presidential campaign.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/c...norary-chair-of-campaign-team/article/2597520

The DNC crapped all over Sanders supporters by favoring Clinton; now Hillary provides another slap in the face to Bernie's supporters by making Schultz Honorary Chairwoman of her campaign.
She must really want Bernie supporters to vote for someone else.
You can't make this stuff up.

Since the DNC is virtually over and the Sanders supporters still seem outraged (not all but a good number) any new comments about how this whole email issue stacks up? Does this hurt HRC or will Sanders supporters "get over it" as has been sublety said by several speakers and interviewees?

 

[civilwarbuff]

I understand, Democrats have a candidate who, for all her faults, is someone who can do the job of being the President , of leading this country.

Seriously? The same woman who can't/won't handle classified material properly? The same woman whom the the FBI Director said was "extremely careless" in handling classified material?
The woman whose unsecured private email server with classified information on it which was likely hacked? That woman?
Lay off the kool-aid......

 

[dysert]

Seriously? The same woman who can't/won't handle classified material properly? The same woman whom the the FBI Director said was "extremely careless" in handling classified material?
The woman whose unsecured private email server with classified information on it which was likely hacked? That woman?
Lay off the kool-aid......

Maybe tulc thinks the ability to handle classified information is not a requirement for a president?

 

[tulc]

Seriously? The same woman who can't/won't handle classified material properly? The same woman whom the the FBI Director said was "extremely careless" in handling classified material?
The woman whose unsecured private email server with classified information on it which was likely hacked? That woman?
Lay off the kool-aid......

It's cute how even after everyone has admitted there wasn't any danger in what she did people still cling to the vain hope that somehow this whole "EMAIL OUTRAGE!!" (tm) is going to make any difference when it comes time to pick someone to be President.
tulc(suspects this is just one more attempt to replace the birther movement among the Republican base)

 

[tulc]

Maybe tulc thinks the ability to handle classified information is not a requirement for a president?

I think of the two? Sec. Clinton has more experience doing so then Mr. Trump. Mr.Trump couldn't even keep his affairs out of the press, how is he going to handle secret documents and information? No, if anyone has drunk any kool-aid in this situation I suspect it's not me.
tulc(knows unless they have coffee flavor kool-aid he's safe from drinking it)

 

[civilwarbuff]

It's cute how even after everyone has admitted there wasn't any danger in what she did people still cling to the vain hope that somehow this whole "EMAIL OUTRAGE!!"

Did Director Comey admit that? If so, please post it. I believe he stated there was classified material on her unsecured server, did he not? I know these are inconvenient questions for the left to answer, but still.....important.

 

[tulc]

Did Director Comey admit that? If so, please post it. I believe he stated there was classified material on her unsecured server, did he not? I know these are inconvenient questions for the left to answer, but still.....important.

You mean like this:
http://mediamatters.org/research/2015/08/12/myths-and-facts-on-hillary-clintons-email-and-r/204913
tulc(will wait for you to wade through this)

 

[civilwarbuff]

You mean like this:
http://mediamatters.org/research/2015/08/12/myths-and-facts-on-hillary-clintons-email-and-r/204913
tulc(will wait for you to wade through this)

Try something more up to date than AUG 2015.......

 

[Uncle Siggy]

Lay off the kool-aid......

What I find amusing is they think HRC isn't a criminal because she's never been indicted/convicted of anything. How many people/world leaders can you think of that were above the law but criminals nonetheless???