How clueless can you get?

[dysert]

So you equate speeding to mis-handling classified material? Sheesh!
What is the difference.....one gets you a fine, the other gets you a prison sentence.

Exactly. I'll gladly pay my fine if Hillary also serves her sentence.

 

[JustOneWay]

So you equate speeding to mis-handling classified material? Sheesh!
What is the difference.....one gets you a fine, the other gets you a prison sentence.

A criminal is a criminal.

If you want to toss around the word, expect it to come back at you.

I bet you too are a criminal. I know I am....

Trump is a criminal.

 

[JustOneWay]

Exactly. I'll gladly pay my fine if Hillary also serves her sentence.

There is no sentence for Hillary

She has found to be not guilty, and no charges were brought forth.

Perhaps you guys missed that?

 

[dysert]

There is no sentence for Hillary

She has found to be not guilty, and no charges were brought forth.

Perhaps you guys missed that?

Doesn't mean she has not broken the law. (I can provide the citations if you're interested.)

 

[JustOneWay]

It is quite simple....

We all know that this criminal talk is politically motivated, and some are playing their part as the useful idiot with all the gusto they can muster.

For once it would be nice if people around here would discuss issues instead of character assassination....

 

[civilwarbuff]

A criminal is a criminal.

If you want to toss around the word, expect it to come back at you.

I bet you too are a criminal. I know I am....

Trump is a criminal.

I will elect someone with a speeding ticket over what should be a felony charge of mis-handling classified information any day of the week.

 

[JustOneWay]

Doesn't mean she has not broken the law. (I can provide the citations if you're interested.)

Of course she has broken the law a few times in her life! You too have admitted to breaking laws, Mr. Criminal

 

[civilwarbuff]

It is quite simple....

We all know that this criminal talk is politically motivated, and some are playing their part as the useful idiot with all the gusto they can muster.

For once it would be nice if people around here would discuss issues instead of character assassination....

So you don't believe mis-handling classified information is a legitimate issue?....

 

[JustOneWay]

I will elect someone with a speeding ticket over what should be a felony charge of mis-handling classified information any day of the week.

And I bet you wished that all the raindrops were lemon drops and gum drops....

Of course you wishing that she SHOULD be arrested will not make it so.

 

[JustOneWay]

So you don't believe mis-handling classified information is a legitimate issue?....

It has been investigated, and sadly it is you who refuses to accept the conclusions. That is all on you. Does it really hurt inside to think that somebody you want to see punished so badly, is found to be not guilty?

 

[civilwarbuff]

It has been investigated, and sadly it is you who refuses to accept the conclusions. That is all on you. It must really hurt inside to think that somebody you want to see punished so badly, is found to be not guilty.

From the SoP
When you Disagree:

Members who participate in the General Politics forum are expected to treat one another with courtesy and respect at all times, ESPECIALLY when you disagree with each other. Always remember that you are first and foremost brothers and sisters in Christ, regardless of your personal political ideology.
When you disagree, address the context of the post and not the poster.

I accept the conclusion that she mis-handled classified material, don't you?

 

[JustOneWay]

I accept the conclusion that she mis-handled classified material, don't you?

Mishandling without the intent to do wrong ends up being a dumb mistake, and not worthy of a conviction or jail time.
Clinton even admitted she made mistakes, but that is not the issue here is it?

I accept that she accepted what she did was wrong, and she was found to be not guilty of anything worthy of an indictment, let alone a conviction. Do you accept that? If you did accept that, we would not be having this discussion, right? Tell us, why do you want to see her put in prison?

 

[dysert]

From Comey:

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the
handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor
would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before
bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the
evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the
context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the
past.
...
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who
engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those
individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not
what we are deciding now.

From me:
To be clear, this is to suggest that we're letting Hillary off the hook, whereas others would face consequences like security or administrative sanctions.

 

[JustOneWay]

From Comey:

From me:
To be clear, this is to suggest that we're letting Hillary off the hook, whereas others would face consequences like security or administrative sanctions.

Then we accept that she is being let off the hook, right?

Right?

 

[dysert]

Then we accept that she is being let off the hook, right?

Right?

What I accept is that Comey gave her special treatment, supposedly because he didn't find *intent* to commit the crimes. How would that go over with a normal person: "But officer, I didn't intend to break the speed limit."

 

[JustOneWay]

What I accept is that Comey gave her special treatment, supposedly because he didn't find *intent* to commit the crimes. How would that go over with a normal person: "But officer, I didn't intend to break the speed limit."

I understand.
You reject the conclusion, so you blame 'special treatment' and continue to claim she is a criminal and should be in prison.

In other words, you reject the conclusions of a republican led investigation, and believe she is guilty regardless of who says otherwise.

 

[civilwarbuff]

Mishandling without the intent to do wrong ends up being a dumb mistake, and not worthy of a conviction or jail time.
Clinton even admitted she made mistakes, but that is not the issue here is it?

Show me in the statutes where it says intent is necessary to violate the law......

 

[civilwarbuff]

From Comey:

From me:
To be clear, this is to suggest that we're letting Hillary off the hook, whereas others would face consequences like security or administrative sanctions.

The same old double standard of the well connected being treated with legal kid gloves while the rest of the masses would go to jail. Just one of the things that the leftist/progressive agenda decries......until it is one of their own.

 

[JustOneWay]

Show me in the statutes where it says intent is necessary to violate the law......

I don't have to. You look it up yourself.

However, here is what the FBI Director said:

FBI Director James Comey announced Tuesday that the bureau is recommending the Justice Department pursue no charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a personal email account to handle government business.

But he said that is largely because investigators found Clinton and her team had no intent to violate the law.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...hillary-clinton-email-investigation/86709530/

 

[JustOneWay]

The same old double standard of the well connected being treated with legal kid gloves while the rest of the masses would go to jail. Just one of the things that the leftist/progressive agenda decries......until it is one of their own.

Perhaps you should get used to some people going to prison while others don't

Black people have been saying this for years, and I bet you don't care about that at all, do you?

Rush Limbaugh got busted doctor shopping for drugs, yet he served no time while others would have gone to prison.