• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Hell is not permanent.

Status
Not open for further replies.

KCDAD

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
12,546
372
70
Illinois
✟14,800.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
timlamb said:
As I recall, I found the question pointless "ain't going to happen" but answered it honestly. It is so pointless, because if we truely praise God in all things, we are His children.

But Timlamb, it may not gonna happen to you, but apparently you think it will happen to someone... so put yourself in their place... a person that truly doesn't believe in hell and yet because of some unforgiven sin they must go there anyway.
 
Upvote 0

KCDAD

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
12,546
372
70
Illinois
✟14,800.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Havahope said:
KCDAD, Now I absolutely, and positively don't get that one. Please explain. :D

An oxymoron... a phrase that contradicts itself... often in humorous context...Military Intelligence, or Civil War. Spiritual body seems to fit this definition... how can it be both? Flesh and Spirit?
 
Upvote 0

EchoPneuma

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2005
2,581
98
81
In a galaxy far far away...
✟3,335.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
KCDAD said:
And thanks for making me explain another joke... geez... so much for my Stand Up for Jesus Comedy Tour. ;)

I got it! George Carlin....early 70's.:thumbsup:

Jumbo Shrimp - Is it a big shrimp or a little jumbo?
Hot water heater - Why would you need to heat hot water? It's either a cold water heater or a hot water cooler.

Dang I'm old......:doh:
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Soul Searcher said:
[SIZE=-1]Fair enough but let me ask you a question as I asked someone else.

If you one day find yourself in this eternal hell do you believe you will accept this fate willingly? Will you say praise God for his justice for I truly deserve to be here[/SIZE]
?

Ah yes the perennial, "One question that totally, absolutely, utterly, completely, destroys the doctrine of ET and no traditional Christian can answer."

Funny I never see Jesus, John, Peter, Paul, etc. asking baiting questions like that. BUT I do remember seeing the Pharisees constantly asking such questions.

Something to think about.
 
Upvote 0

KCDAD

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
12,546
372
70
Illinois
✟14,800.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Der Alter said:
Funny I never see Jesus, John, Peter, Paul, etc. asking baiting questions like that.

First answer me this, whose face, whose inscription is on that coin?

First answer me this, by whose authority did John baptise?
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Havahope said:
[SIZE=-1]Then what is the body like that they will they take to hell?

IOW, where is the scripture which describes this kind of, or the third kind of body?[/SIZE]

Another Pharisaical question.
Matthew 16:1 The Pharisees also with the Sadducees came, and tempting . . .

Matthew 19:3 The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, . . . .​
Only the Pharisees asked these kind of questions, not because they really wanted or expected an answer but because they thought they could trap Jesus into saying something wrong.

Jesus, John, Peter, Paul, etc never asked this kind of question.

Something to think about.

And OBTW, the question is irrelevant. Because,
Matt 19:26 But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.

Mark 10:27 And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.

Luke 1:37 For with God nothing shall be impossible.

Luke 18:27 And he said, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God.​
If God decrees a thing to happen, he is not limited by our puny human understanding, he can make it happen. Body or no body.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
KCDAD said:
[SIZE=-1]First answer me this, whose face, whose inscription is on that coin?

First answer me this, by whose authority did John baptise?[/SIZE]

Typical knee jerk response. Why are both these answers irrelevant? Who initiated the questioning and who threw it back in their face?

You have just put yourself solidly in the Pharissee camp? Want to try again?
 
Upvote 0

KCDAD

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
12,546
372
70
Illinois
✟14,800.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Der Alter said:
Typical knee jerk response. Why are both these answers irrelevant? Who initiated the questioning and who threw it back in their face?

You have just put yourself solidly in the Pharissee camp? Want to try again?
DerAlter, I am hardly a Pharisee...

So it isn't the asking of the question, it is who started it? Sounds rather childish, doesn't it? (She touched me first!)
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
KCDAD said:
[SIZE=-1]Der Alter, can God learn? Can God be surprised? Can God change his mind?[/SIZE]

And thus spaketh the Pharisees. Not because you want or expect an answer, but because you think, no matter what I answer I will be wrong.

Hey, dood, you tell me?

Let us consider this passage from Jeremiah. God said “I have caused to cleave” That word is [size=+1]הדבקתי[/size]/ha’dabaq’thi. It is in the perfect or completed sense. God’s will, expressly stated, for the whole house of Israel and Judah, not just an elect, predestined, chosen, few, was for all of Israel and all of Judah to cling to God as a belt clings to a man’s waist. It was done, finished, completed, in God’s sight, and, according to some arguments presented, nothing man can do will cause God’s will to not be done. But they, Israel and Judah, would not hear and obey, their will, vs. God’s will, So God destroyed them, vs. 14.

Someone may say, “The rebellious Israelites might have been destroyed temporally but still have been accepted into God’s kingdom, in the resurrection, etc.”

But this passage very much speaks to the issue of God’s sovereign will, and man’s free will and agency. God stated very clearly what His will was, in terms that cannot be misunderstood. But, because the Israelites would not hear, and obey, God destroyed them, instead of them being unto God, “for a people, and for a name, and for a praise, and for a glory, vs. 10.”
Jer 13:1 Thus saith the LORD unto me, Go and get thee a linen girdle, and put it upon thy loins, and put it not in water.
2 So I got a girdle according to the word of the LORD, and put it on my loins.
3 And the word of the LORD came unto me the second time, saying,
4 Take the girdle that thou hast got, which is upon thy loins, and arise, go to Euphrates, and hide it there in a hole of the rock.
5 So I went, and hid it by Euphrates, as the LORD commanded me.
6 And it came to pass after many days, that the LORD said unto me, Arise, go to Euphrates, and take the girdle from thence, which I commanded thee to hide there.
7 Then I went to Euphrates, and digged, and took the girdle from the place where I had hid it: and, behold, the girdle was marred, it was profitable for nothing.
8 Then the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
9 Thus saith the LORD, After this manner will I mar the pride of Judah, and the great pride of Jerusalem.
10 This evil people, which refuse to hear my words, which walk in the imagination of their heart, and walk after other gods, to serve them, and to worship them, shall even be as this girdle, which is good for nothing.
11 For as the girdle cleaveth to the loins of a man, so have I caused to cleave [[size=+1]הדבקתי[/size]/ha’dabaq’thi] unto me the whole house of Israel and the whole house of Judah, saith the LORD; that they might be unto me for a people, and for a name, and for a praise, and for a glory: but they would not hear.
• • •
14 And I will dash them one against another, even the fathers and the sons together, saith the LORD: I will not pity, nor spare, nor have mercy, but destroy them.
Note, verse 14, God said He will NOT have pity, will NOT spare, and will NOT have mercy but destroy them. Is there anything in this triple condemnation that suggests, sometime in the future, God would relent and restore those whom He had destroyed? This passage was written more than 2700 years ago, and it still reads as the prophet wrote it. Ten thousand times, ten thousand years from now, God’s eternal word will still say, “I will not pity, nor spare, nor have mercy, but destroy them.”
H1692 [size=+1]דבק[/size] dabaq daw-bak'
A primitive root; properly to impinge, that is, cling or adhere; figuratively to catch by pursuit: - abide, fast, cleave (fast together), follow close (hard, after), be joined (together), keep (fast), overtake, pursue hard, stick, take.

H8816 Perfect

The Perfect expresses a completed action.

1) In reference to time, such an action may be:

1a) one just completed from the standpoint of the present
- "I have come" to tell you the news

1b) one completed in the more or less distant past in the beginning God "created"
- "I was (once) young" and "I have (now) grown old" but
- "I have not seen" a righteous man forsaken

1c) one already completed from the point of view of another past act
- God saw everything that "he had made"

1d) one completed from the point of view of another action yet future
- I will draw for thy camels also until "they have done" drinking

2) The perfect is often used where the present is employed in English.

2a) in the case of general truths or actions of frequent occurrence--truths or actions which have been often experienced or observed
- the grass "withereth"
- the sparrow "findeth" a house

2b) an action or attitude of the past may be continued into the present
"I stretch out" my hands to thee
"thou never forsakest" those who seek thee

2c) the perfect of intransitive verbs is used where English uses the present; The perfect in Hebrew in such a case emphasizes a condition which has come into "complete existence" and realization
- "I know" thou wilt be king
- "I hate" all workers of iniquity

2d) Sometimes in Hebrew, future events are conceived so vividly and so realistically that they are regarded as Having virtually taken place and are described by the perfect.

2d1) in promises, threats and language of contracts
- the field "give I" thee
- and if not, "I will take it"

2d2) prophetic language
- my people "is gone into captivity" (i.e. shall assuredly go).​
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
KCDAD said:
[SIZE=-1]DerAlter, I am hardly a Pharisee...

So it isn't the asking of the question, it is who started it? Sounds rather childish, doesn't it? (She touched me first!)[/SIZE]

The point is that neither Jesus nor any of the apostles ever went to anyone taunting them with carefully contrived questions designed, not to elicit answers but, to trap someone into giving a wrong, or contradictory answer.

They taught, they did not taunt or try to entrap.

The ONLY example you can come up with was when Jesus turned the tables on the Pharisees.

Your questions were not contrived to elicit answers but to taunt, to trap someone into giving a wrong or contradictory answer, just like the Pharisees.

I like your response, shows exactly where you are coming from "Neener, neener, neener, you are one too-oo."
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
EchoPneuma said:
[SIZE=-1]So now if a question is asked, we are "Pharisees", and Der Alter has set himself up as Jesus being asked the questions by us Pharisees.

Egad. What a revolting development[/SIZE]
.....

More "Neener, neener, neeer, you are one too-oo."

Only when someone asks a taunting question contrived to elicit a wrong or contradictory answer, and not because the questioner honestly wanted or expected a reasoned response.

The questions I have beeen addressing are all of the nature, "Here is one question that totally, absolutely, completely, utterly, destroys the doctrine of UT, and no traditional Christian can answer it."

As I said neither Jesus, nor any of the apostles, went to anyone taunting them with questions contrived to entrap them. They taught, they did not say "Here is one question that totally, absolutely, completely, utterly, destroys the doctrine of the Pharisees, and no Pharisee can answer it."
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.