Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Thank you!Well, I thought that those few postulates were widely held enough for me to not look up the verses, but as you wish, I'll start looking some stuff up.
You presume too much..Then how did he sin? If he was very good, then he cannot have sinned.
Jesus is OF God, and He was tempted;Which means that God did not create him "Very Good", which is a violation of the scriptures. Which leads me to yet another nonsensical dead end.
Not so.As many as I need to until I find answers which explain this logical inconsistency. I'm not afraid of attacking God to find answers, I don't think that God would want me to put my trust in Him if I was unsure. I think (and this is purely speculation) that God would want me to come to him satisfied with the scriptures, and not following in blind faith.
You weren't really debating, but rather making blind speculations.. but if you say it's hypothetical, then I take you at your word, be at peace.I'm sorry if my method of debate seems like I am attacking God the whole time, really this is just a hypothetical so calm down a bit...
With Jesus.With Jesus.
We need a Saviour, and a Saviour Who will not save is no Saviour at all!You seem so scared of offending God that you will not have an open discussion about this - any time I (or someone else) makes some sort of hypothetical statement, mostly to poke holes in someone's logic, you come up against us raging about "What will I do on the day of reckoning?"
As long as assertions are not blindly thrown around without Biblical backing, sure.Can we just have some sensible, open discussion?
Yes. Do you understand how that can be so by looking into the Hebraic text? IOW; You understand, then, that eliohim can be construed to speak of either THE God, or gods in the plural, angels, men in kingly estates, ect..?You do realize that the word angel just means messenger so an angel can be either a man or an angel being right?
Hell is not yet kindled.Not to mention that if we are to follow you line umm "reasoning" then there would be no adversaries because they are all in Hell already!
To be fair, you did not use those words precisely, but you did imply as much with this statement;Also show me where I said there a no enemies of God?
Nowhere that's where, but you would like to insinuate that I did so could have grounds to accuse me.
Now, if I misunderstood, I'm willing to be corrected..MartyMonster said:If the Lucifer doctrine falls so does the Satan as a scapegoat to take the fall for being the origin of evil doctrine as well. (pun intended)
1 Peter 5:8-9Actually it is you that is saying that God has no enemies by quoting verses to make it look like a bunch of angelic beings got chucked out of heaven and are now in Hell.
Tell me what you expect, and I'll do my best.You need to check the verses you quote more carefully from now on!
All God wants is YOU, you can leave your theology at the door
But, nevertheless, this is a debate forum, so bring it here, leave it with Jesus.![]()
Is your faith is in God to save you, or your theology?Yes, but what if this issue of theology is getting in the way of my faith?
Join the club!I cannot believe something that I don't understand, or that has issues in it that I cannot seem to be able to get past.
Those links lead to posts from AGEE ago (and they are not your posts, I might add)..
Post numbers are a better way to 'link' on these forums, as they are constant.![]()
Is your faith is in God to save you, or your theology?
John 5:39
Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.
Romans 8:15-17
For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.
The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together.
Join the club!
1 Cor 13:12
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
2 Cor 5:2-9
For in this we groan, earnestly desiring to be clothed upon with our house which is from heaven: If so be that being clothed we shall not be found naked. For we that are in this tabernacle do groan, being burdened: not for that we would be unclothed, but clothed upon, that mortality might be swallowed up of life.
Now he that hath wrought us for the selfsame thing is God, who also hath given unto us the earnest of the Spirit. Therefore we are always confident, knowing that, whilst we are at home in the body, we are absent from the Lord: (For we walk by faith, not by sight: )
We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord. Wherefore we labour, that, whether present or absent, we may be accepted of him.
Maybe you guys should take a break from this thread and come back after a bit of a rest? Or do I need to make some reports to force a hiatus?
That is correct.
And since sin is not an entity, it does not have 'existance'.
Sin does not 'breath', men do, who sin.
So, do you ever sin? If you do, does that sin exist as an action that you commit?That is correct.
And since sin is not an entity, it does not have 'existance'.
Sin does not 'breath', men do, who sin.
Antony,
Are you saying that God created 9/11, the Third Reich and Pol Pot's killing fields?