- Oct 16, 2023
- 2,615
- 556
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
Fair enough. I had thought they used to orbit.Were on the ends of missiles in silos on earth.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Fair enough. I had thought they used to orbit.Were on the ends of missiles in silos on earth.
Proof God did not say it possessing a human?You quoted what someone wrote down and said was what god said.
All the more reason not to argue with Him. You say you think there is none to argue with. From all we know of what he said though, He is with me in this issueBecause I don't find his existence credible. Do you seriously not understand what it means that I don't believe in your god?
It wasn’t, there, sorted.Proof God did not say it possessing a human?
So the human who told us the savior would be born of a virgin made it up? You know that how?It wasn’t, there, sorted.
Same way I know Helen of Troy wasn’t the product of Zeus turning into a swan and seducing women.So the human who told us the savior would be born of a virgin made it up?
You know that how?
Sons of god did marry women in the past. Angels can assume disguises as well. Jesus being born in a specific little own on earth to a virgin is not a vague claim. It was a specific prediction that happened. You don't get to wave away reality using a disdain of fables.Same way I know Helen of Troy wasn’t the product of Zeus turning into a swan and seducing women.
Sons of god did marry women in the past. Angels can assume disguises as well.
Jesus being born in a specific little own on earth to a virgin is not a vague claim. It was a specific prediction that happened.
You don't get to wave away reality using a disdain of fables.
I'm arguing with *YOU*. No one else.All the more reason not to argue with Him.
Just you.You say you think there is none to argue with.
I don't care how many other entities you claim are with you. It is your arguments and presented evidence that matters.From all we know of what he said though, He is with me in this issue
That would be "Matthew". We know it because we can read Isiah 7 (the whole thing) and see that the prophesied child was not a savior, but as a marker of his young future for when the lands of the kings enemies will be abandoned. (This on is just an irrelevant prophecy, not a fake one.)So the human who told us the savior would be born of a virgin made it up? You know that how?
WitnessesAllegedly.
It could have had some bits of truth in it, or not. As I mentioned God's angels can be unrecognizable. In disguise. We could meet one and never know it. So I do not see it as impossible that even a fallen angel could adopt some sort of disguise. Who really knows? The bible does say Satan's messengers appear as beings of light. Then there are the wolves disguised as sheep. Then there are angels that some see and others do not at the same time. Etc. In the past there also were sons of god that came into the world and married women. I couldn't say if some twisted word of mouth passed on stories of that time may have existed and became legends or whatever. I kind of doubt it but who really knows?Wait, I thought you just said the swan thing could have happened. Is it a fable or not?
Actually it was a message to the house of David from which the messiah would come.That would be "Matthew". We know it because we can read Isiah 7 (the whole thing) and see that the prophesied child was not a savior, but as a marker of his young future for when the lands of the kings enemies will be abandoned.
Yet you actually argue against the Scriptures I quoted. No? Your attempt to say that is me are noted.I'm arguing with *YOU*. No one else.
No. GodJust you.
Back to the topic then I guess. I don't think God likes rich people wasting and wasting and wasting while the poor starve. Would you agree that is a pretty basic biblical concept?I don't care how many other entities you claim are with you. It is your arguments and presented evidence that matters.
Witnesses
The modern worshippers of the old gods at least tend to not defend all the silliness from their stories. Guess disbelief in supernatural things is so bad even the claims from other pantheons need to be defended as happening in some way.It could have had some bits of truth in it, or not. As I mentioned God's angels can be unrecognizable. In disguise. We could meet one and never know it. So I do not see it as impossible that even a fallen angel could adopt some sort of disguise. Who really knows? The bible does say Satan's messengers appear as beings of light. Then there are the wolves disguised as sheep. Then there are angels that some see and others do not at the same time. Etc. In the past there also were sons of god that came into the world and married women. I couldn't say if some twisted word of mouth passed on stories of that time may have existed and became legends or whatever. I kind of doubt it but who really knows?
Remind me what this has to do with space exploration ?Actually it was a message to the house of David from which the messiah would come.
Isaiah 7:13
And he said, Hear ye now, O house of David; Is it a small thing for you to weary men, but will ye weary my God also?
Isaiah 7:14
Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
That means Lord with us. In others words a virgin would bear God's Son.
Only because you replied to my pair of posts in opposite order. I hadn't argued with your "scriptures" when I wrote that and had no intention to do so, but...Yet you actually argue against the Scriptures I quoted. No? Your attempt to say that is me are noted.
No. God
Back to the topic then I guess. I don't think God likes rich people wasting and wasting and wasting while the poor starve. Would you agree that is a pretty basic biblical concept?
Paul asserted, "Your master is the one you obey," and I think that is a pertinent truism.Is that a definition of worship? In this context? Really?
And what do the next two verses say and mean?Actually it was a message to the house of David from which the messiah would come.
Isaiah 7:13
And he said, Hear ye now, O house of David; Is it a small thing for you to weary men, but will ye weary my God also?
Isaiah 7:14
Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
That means Lord with us. In others words a virgin would bear God's Son.
All the weapons were down here.Information is a weapon. Also, the MERVs used to be up there and were weapons. With treaties and secrecy I doubt we have access to a list of actual weapons now up there. If history is any indication, we can be fairly certain there are or/and will be more.
I'm just about done with this bald assertion guy. The arguments are BAD.All the weapons were down here.
You can't just position a nuke in orbit and leave it there. Nukes have to be maintained and even switched out periodically.