Phil G
Grafted In
The problem is that the Bible does not define the earth as flat. There are verses, such as the ones you quote, which are used to promote both the ideas that the people who physically wrote the Bible believed the earth to be flat and that the earth is flat. While I accept you don't claim the latter, I believe you are wrong on the former.And for the record, im not a flat-earther. But that doesnt mean that the Biblical authors were not. The Bible was simply written long before the shape of the earth was discovered. Its the same reason the early church struggled to accept heliocentrism and put galileo on house arrest.
One of the things which amazes me is how some people today seem to be of the opinion that the biblical authors didn't use metaphor when describing God's creation, yet they used metaphor in many other places. Verses such as Isaiah 55:12 (trees don't have hands), Psalm 93:1 (God doesn't wear clothing because He is spirit), Proverbs 15:3 (God doesn't have literal eyes), John 15:1 (Jesus is not a literal vine), John 10:7 (Jesus is not a literal door), and many other verses clearly reveal the use of metaphor within the Jewish thinking.
Yet when it comes to the shape of the earth and the creation of the universe, it's all supposedly to be taken literally, according to some. But the reality is the Bible authors mixed literal truths with metaphors. Sometimes it's obvious which is which, other times bias can play a part in deciding when something should be understood as metaphor and when not. Sometimes a word can be translated in other ways which steer away from any understanding of a flat earth. This is why Bible study is so important. For every biblical expert and theologian who claims the Bible authors believed the earth to be flat, you will find another who disagrees.
Some translations and inferences of words in your quoted verses are at best, contentious. For instance the Hebrew word 'raqia' translated as 'dome' in your Genesis quotes does not necessarily mean something solid. It can be an 'expanse' of something composed of matter. Scientists say the universe is composed of both matter and energy. In my opinion that fits well with 'raqia'.
The Hebrew word 'chug' in its masculine noun form found in Proverbs 8:27 and Isaiah 40:22 means 'vault', not circle. And if the earth was understood as a circle, how can it have four corners (Isaiah 11:12)?
The Hebrew word 'dur' found in Isaiah 22:18 does not definitively mean 'ball'. It can mean 'pile' or 'circle' too.
There is a whole maze of problems interpreting Scripture as to how the shape of the earth was understood at the time. It is not defined in the Bible and therefore the Bible should not be used for such purposes.
Last edited:
Upvote
0